In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:15:15 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article >,
says...
>
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:58:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > In article >,
> > says...
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:15:49 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:34:54 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > > > In article >, says...
> > > > >
> > > > > > > What's funny is to hear Kevin and harry call someone liars LOL!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You ARE a liar, as well as Zimmerman. Now show me ONE LIE from me..... I
> > > > > > realize you won't answer because you are bat**** insane.
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, I will show you one. You wrote "Zimmerman's statements are hearsay, that's what threepontoons just said!"
> > > > >
> > > > > That is a LIE. I never wrote or said that. I know better, I understand what hearsay is.
> > > >
> > > > You said that a person's statements are hearsay. Isn't Zimmerman a
> > > > person?
> > >
> > > I never said that, either. I *did* say that the article you referenced was full of hearsay and conjecture, both of which are true.
> > >
> > > Clue: Look up "hearsay". Only some of a person's statements are hearsay.
> >
> > OH! So in your mind, if someone says something that doesn't fit your
> > particular agenda, it's hearsay. If someone says something (like
> > Zimmerman) that does fit your agenda, it's not?
>
> Are you really that dense? Again, look up the term "hearsay". Educate yourself, you're looking particularly ignorant today.

No, I'm not, but you sure are showing your bigotry.

Another term you should look up.

Oh, you ARE a bigot!

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:13:42 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article >,
says...
>
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 11:15:15 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > In article >,
> > says...
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:58:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:15:49 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > says...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:34:54 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article >, says...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What's funny is to hear Kevin and harry call someone liars LOL!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You ARE a liar, as well as Zimmerman. Now show me ONE LIE from me..... I
> > > > > > > > realize you won't answer because you are bat**** insane.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK, I will show you one. You wrote "Zimmerman's statements are hearsay, that's what threepontoons just said!"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That is a LIE. I never wrote or said that. I know better, I understand what hearsay is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You said that a person's statements are hearsay. Isn't Zimmerman a
> > > > > > person?
> > > > >
> > > > > I never said that, either. I *did* say that the article you referenced was full of hearsay and conjecture, both of which are true.
> > > > >
> > > > > Clue: Look up "hearsay". Only some of a person's statements are hearsay.
> > > >
> > > > OH! So in your mind, if someone says something that doesn't fit your
> > > > particular agenda, it's hearsay. If someone says something (like
> > > > Zimmerman) that does fit your agenda, it's not?
> > >
> > > Are you really that dense? Again, look up the term "hearsay". Educate yourself, you're looking particularly ignorant today.
> >
> > No, I'm not, but you sure are showing your bigotry.
>
> Another term you should look up.

Oh, you ARE a bigot!

BIGOT - intolerant person: somebody with strong opinions, especially on politics, religion, or ethnicity, who refuses to accept different views

You're one of the most bigoted people in this NG.

Meanwhile, I've said nothing bigoted in this thread. The word "hearsay" has a definition which is not subjective, I've applied it properly, and you have not. Pointing that out is not bigotry, as there is no alternate view possible.

There, you have learned something today.

Bye.

On 7/25/12 12:34 PM, wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:58:26 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:15:49 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > says...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:34:54 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article says...


What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

It's > and that's HTML for a . I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.

BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.

On 7/25/12 2:51 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

It's > and that's HTML for a . I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.

BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.


Nope...this one is "clean."

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:56:24 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/25/12 2:51 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
>> What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?
>
> It's > and that's HTML for a >. I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.
>
> BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.
>

Nope...this one is "clean."

Yes it was... until I opened it to reply. It did it with IE, and now this is with Chrome. I'll poke around to see if I can find out more.

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:56:24 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/25/12 2:51 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
>> What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?
>
> It's > and that's HTML for a >. I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.
>
> BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.
>

Nope...this one is "clean."

Yes it was... until I opened it to reply. It did it with IE, and now this is with Chrome. I'll poke around to see if I can find out more.

Yep, it's back now, that's for sure! Did you just upgrade or anything?

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

It's > and that's HTML for a . I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.

BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.

It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:30:57 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the >
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

Nope, no upgrades to my machine. I use Google Groups to read and post. The garbage isn't there until I click reply, then the window that opens has changed all the existing to the HTML version. The new ones added by the reply are , just the existing ones get changed. Does it with both IE and Chrome. As I had posted earlier, I'll investigate it more later.

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:30:57 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the >
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

Nope, no upgrades to my machine. I use Google Groups to read and post. The garbage isn't there until I click reply, then the window that opens has changed all the existing to the HTML version. The new ones added by the reply are , just the existing ones get changed. Does it with both IE and Chrome. As I had posted earlier, I'll investigate it more later.

And Google just changed their format, so I guess that's the problem.