On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

On 7/10/2012 1:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

They say the mind is the second thing to go, eh Limpy?

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

Do you recall posting a picture of owls that was stolen from a pro's
website and you claimed that you took the picture?

In article om,
says...

On 7/10/2012 1:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

They say the mind is the second thing to go, eh Limpy?

EW.... I just threw up a little in my mouth....

On 7/10/12 1:45 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 7/10/2012 1:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

They say the mind is the second thing to go, eh Limpy?

EW.... I just threw up a little in my mouth....


Strange...that's the same reaction most rational people have when they
encounter your repetitive posts here.

On 7/10/12 1:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

Do you recall posting a picture of owls that was stolen from a pro's
website and you claimed that you took the picture?



As a point of fact, I believe my comment was "Here's a photo of some
owls," and Herring jumped to the wrong conclusion. This is not unusual
among righties. Some years ago, I posted a photo of a pretty young girl
and said something like "This is someone's pretty granddaughter," and
your retarded friend JustHate assumed she was *my* granddaughter.

This is all part of the well-known parlor game, "Stump the Language
Retards." You're in that group, along with Herring, JustHate, and a few
others.

On 7/10/2012 1:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

Do you recall posting a picture of owls that was stolen from a pro's
website and you claimed that you took the picture?

You caught him in that lie. Move on.

On 7/10/2012 2:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/10/12 1:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and
said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes
back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

Do you recall posting a picture of owls that was stolen from a pro's
website and you claimed that you took the picture?



As a point of fact, I believe my comment was "Here's a photo of some
owls," and Herring jumped to the wrong conclusion. This is not unusual
among righties. Some years ago, I posted a photo of a pretty young girl
and said something like "This is someone's pretty granddaughter," and
your retarded friend JustHate assumed she was *my* granddaughter.

This is all part of the well-known parlor game, "Stump the Language
Retards." You're in that group, along with Herring, JustHate, and a few
others.



You're into a game of deciept, lies, and misdirection. So why do you get
up tight when we turn things around on you?

In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 1:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/10/12 12:57 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/10/12 12:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

Are you denying you posted a picture of owls stolen from a pro and said
that you took it in your back yard? Be careful now.



I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

YOU posted a picture of owls, claimed it was yours and it was stolen
from a website. Are you really going to deny it? Google groups goes back
a LONG time now....


I don't recall posting anything about owls in my backyard, dip****.

Do you recall posting a picture of owls that was stolen from a pro's
website and you claimed that you took the picture?



As a point of fact, I believe my comment was "Here's a photo of some
owls," and Herring jumped to the wrong conclusion. This is not unusual
among righties. Some years ago, I posted a photo of a pretty young girl
and said something like "This is someone's pretty granddaughter," and
your retarded friend JustHate assumed she was *my* granddaughter.

This is all part of the well-known parlor game, "Stump the Language
Retards." You're in that group, along with Herring, JustHate, and a few
others.

You are a ****ing liar!

On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:20:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article .com>,
says...
>
> On 7/10/2012 10:40 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> > In article b.com>,
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 7/10/2012 9:56 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>> In article >, says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/10/2012 8:59 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>>>> In article b.com>,
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 7/10/2012 8:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article >, says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 7/10/2012 12:14 AM, jps wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:30:25 -0400, JustWait >
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/9/2012 9:57 PM, jps wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:14:59 -0400, X ` Man
> >>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ; On 7/9/12 8:31 PM, JustWait wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; On 7/9/2012 8:02 PM, BAR wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;> In article > ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:55:47 -0700 (PDT), Tim >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> On Jul 7, 12:47 pm, X ` Man <dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> can.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>> http://tinyurl.com/c8vwvhr
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> "Rev. Mel Lewis, Christian Identity Ministries, Lamar County, co-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> sponsor of the event has expressed that, "no one is breaking any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> laws," and "no one is violating any ordinances."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> Rev. Lewis contends that the Christians that are a part of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> conference have been treated unfairly. However, the citizens of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> Winfield are angered, as well as the mayor, stating, "...The city of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> Winfield does not condone this."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> http://www.examiner.com/article/alab...nly-conference
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> Like some here on rec. boats, it seems Mel Lewis and William J.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> Collier are just wanting to stir a pot to **** others off simply
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> because they can.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> Though extremely bad form it still comes down to "no one is breaking
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>> any laws," and "no one is violating any ordinances."
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>> Same views held by a large percentage of the Tea Party, including Rand
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>> Paul. They want to reinforce the rights of bigots to repeal the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>> rights of law abiding citizens, especially people of color.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;> Do you have proof to back up your allegation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; No, of course not but the tactic of the left is to just say it over and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; over, and not let anybody talk about anything else...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ;
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ;
> >>>>>>>>>>>&gt ; IT's PsychoScotty!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if I've ever witnessed a more clearcut example of
> >>>>>>>>>>> projection than that demonstrated daily by the freak.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Lemme see, a pedophile and a racist hate me... I must be doing something
> >>>>>>>>>> right
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> And that's just among your family members.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Wow, another deskdweller / internet hero.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Focus... try to stay on the topic......
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> This thread hasn't been on topic in quite a while thanks to you among
> >>>>>> others.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do you always have to answer for Scotty? Well, maybe you're trying to
> >>>>> protect him from his own insane rants.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Just because you and the rest of the stalker/pedo crew say so? LOL!
> >>>
> >>> OH, now I'm a pedophile???? You are just too crazy!
> >>>
> >> I think he's lumping you in with the rest of the "leg humpers". I
> >> suspect you don't want to be associated with them.
> >
> > Yep, that's very bigoted. What if I lumped all conservatives with the
> > Westboro Baptists?
> >
> You don't have the lumpability. Just bull**** like Plume.

Of course I don't. I'm not a bigot.

Bigot: somebody with strong opinions, especially on politics, religion, or ethnicity, who refuses to accept different views

You fit that to a "T".