On 6/21/12 2:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/21/2012 1:44 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:57:47 -0400, wrote:

On 6/21/2012 9:39 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?
f=/n/a/2012/06/20/national/a175939D44.DTL&tsp=1



Your links are broken. Fix em won't you.

His news reader is doing a line feed in the middle of the link, you
have to copy and paste the whole thing into your browser.

It is just an article that says the Sanford police chief was fired ...
after they refused to accept his resignation.

I suspect he wasn't really fired, they just did decide to accept his
resignation. I really don't care., When people are on a witch hunt,
there is always collateral damage. Lee was actually trying to reform
what used to be a pretty bad police department. I doubt he will have a
hard time finding a new job.

Yeah, maybe in a town that cares more about the law than the idiots in
Sanford and the asshole racists in DC who are using this case for
re-election...


Who exactly is using this case for re-election, and how are they using
it? Try to be specific. Talking about the case doesn't get you re-elected.

Is there anything you think about or do with competency? There's sure no
evidence of it.