|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/27/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him Oh! I thought you were talking about one of Harry's boats. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/29/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/29/12 1:01 PM, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? Zimmerman shouldn't have started the fight, eh? Who started the fight? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/29/12 9:09 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:21:35 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. The significant thing is the state has said they have no evidence that it didn't happen that way at the bail hearing and the state has the burden of proof. The significant thing is that there is an ongoing investigation, and that there have been a number of conflicting reports as to what may have happened. The prosecution will present a case that demonstrates proof. Whether that convinces a jury is another matter. I suspect we'll end up with a hung jury because the whites on the jury will vote to acquit no matter what. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On Apr 30, 2:26*am, jps wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. *If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. *Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? *Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? *They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? *Ridiculous. Why are you so angry JPS? Haven't been getting your full dose of pecker lately? Did your boyfriend cu you off? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On Apr 29, 8:21*pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. *If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. Ah! the creme-de-la-creme has arrived. This is what happens when people who have Napoleon's disease are allowed into a boating forum. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article ,
says... On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. Zimmerman should have gone to the Hospital but he could have refused medical attention, he is an adult. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. You have no proof "he pursued the kid". |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/2012 3:26 AM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. Send your check to the blacks for revenge on Zimmerman fund C/O Al Sharpton Washington D.C. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/29/2012 1:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. There's plenty of evidence that, that happened.. Photos of blood running down Zimmermans back, grass on his back, the witness who said it happened... and more. Why can't you even be honest in this issue, are you so racist that you can only see it one way? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/29/2012 9:44 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/29/12 9:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:21:35 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. The significant thing is the state has said they have no evidence that it didn't happen that way at the bail hearing and the state has the burden of proof. The significant thing is that there is an ongoing investigation, and that there have been a number of conflicting reports as to what may have happened. Not even close... The prosecution will present a case that demonstrates proof. Whether that convinces a jury is another matter. I suspect we'll end up with a hung jury because the whites on the jury will vote to acquit no matter what. Right, only black people are interested in justice... snerk. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:21:35 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. The significant thing is the state has said they have no evidence that it didn't happen that way at the bail hearing and the state has the burden of proof. Cite? You stupid ****, you still have not listened to the transcript of the court hearing and you are commenting here anyway? What a harry... |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/29/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/29/12 1:01 PM, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? Zimmerman shouldn't have started the fight, eh? Martin shouldn't have been casing his neighbors cars on the way home, eh? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/12 11:26 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/29/2012 9:44 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/29/12 9:09 PM, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:21:35 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. The significant thing is the state has said they have no evidence that it didn't happen that way at the bail hearing and the state has the burden of proof. The significant thing is that there is an ongoing investigation, and that there have been a number of conflicting reports as to what may have happened. Not even close... The prosecution will present a case that demonstrates proof. Whether that convinces a jury is another matter. I suspect we'll end up with a hung jury because the whites on the jury will vote to acquit no matter what. Right, only black people are interested in justice... snerk. It's safe to assume that an ignorant fool like you would not know about the serious race-related problems the Sanford police had and have, the drug problems in the area, and that large parts of north east and central Florida are populated by ignorant white racists at least as stupid as you are, or that Florida itself had the largest number of lynchings of black folks. So, yes, race is still a big issue in parts of Florida. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/12 11:28 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/29/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/29/12 1:01 PM, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? Zimmerman shouldn't have started the fight, eh? Martin shouldn't have been casing his neighbors cars on the way home, eh? Oh? You have proof of that? Doubtful. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/2012 4:40 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Apr 30, 2:26 am, wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. The EMT's can not force him to go to a hospital. And like plum, you need to go to the court hearing last week, listen to it, then come back and comment... He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. Why, the law is clear. Even if he is an idiot, AND has a gun, he can *still* meet the criteria to qualify for stand your ground? I still don't understand why progressives refuse to even quick over the evidence available before they make up their bull**** lies, only thing I can think of is, it's an election year for the Racist in Chief... Why are you so angry JPS? Haven't been getting your full dose of pecker lately? Did your boyfriend cu you off? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/2012 7:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. Zimmerman should have gone to the Hospital but he could have refused medical attention, he is an adult. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. You have no proof "he pursued the kid". And yet, I guarantee, plum, jps, and the asshat will still keep saying it.... Right till November 6th... and ride it all the way! |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article , says...
On 4/29/2012 1:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. There's plenty of evidence that, that happened.. Photos of blood running down Zimmermans back, grass on his back, the witness who said it happened... and more. Why can't you even be honest in this issue, are you so racist that you can only see it one way? Cite? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article , says...
On 4/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:21:35 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? You have no evidence if that happened. Even if it did, he may have very well been defending himself. The significant thing is the state has said they have no evidence that it didn't happen that way at the bail hearing and the state has the burden of proof. Cite? You stupid ****, you still have not listened to the transcript of the court hearing and you are commenting here anyway? What a harry... Bull****. NO WHERE in the transcript did anyone from the state's attorney's office ever say "they have no evidence" of anything. If there is, show me. Short answer, you can't. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article , says...
On 4/29/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/29/12 1:01 PM, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:33:31 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:58:25 -0400, wrote: Might get his bail raised or revoked. The guy also may have another lawyer leave him after he lied to him. SANFORD, Fla. ? A judge is considering whether to raise or revoke the bond for George Zimmerman after his lawyer told the judge a website raised $200,000 for the defense. Mark O'Mara told the judge Friday that Zimmerman's family hadn't told him about the money before his client was given $150,000 bond. Florida Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester says he wants to know more about the money before he decides whether to adjust the bond. The judge will make a decision on the bond at a later date. Zimmerman is accused of second-degree murder for the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was unarmed. Zimmerman claims self-defense. The neighborhood watch volunteer wasn't charged for more than six weeks, leading to nationwide protests That $200k is going to be more like 120k after taxes and the lawyers will eat all of it. Good, he shouldn't be paid because he killed a kid. ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? Zimmerman shouldn't have started the fight, eh? Martin shouldn't have been casing his neighbors cars on the way home, eh? Cite? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article , says...
On 4/30/2012 7:29 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. Zimmerman should have gone to the Hospital but he could have refused medical attention, he is an adult. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. You have no proof "he pursued the kid". And yet, I guarantee, plum, jps, and the asshat will still keep saying it.... Right till November 6th... and ride it all the way! You have no proof that Martin attacked Zimmerman, either, but you and the rest of the FOX sheeples sure do cling to that idea. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article ,
says... On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:26:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. I suppose it all comes down to the difference between pursuit and simply following with the intent of maintaining visual contact. Zimmerman has the legal right to watch someone and that is the legal test. And Martin had the legal right to be walking around at night. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article ,
says... On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:52:10 -0400, X ` Man wrote: It's safe to assume that an ignorant fool like you would not know about the serious race-related problems the Sanford police had and have, the drug problems in the area, and that large parts of north east and central Florida are populated by ignorant white racists at least as stupid as you are, or that Florida itself had the largest number of lynchings of black folks. So, yes, race is still a big issue in parts of Florida. You are talking ancient history. When was the last lynching? 75 years ago? 100 years ago? This particular neighborhood was racially mixed and the black guy who came to the defense of Zimmerman was a retired CNN executive. The Sanford police had a shakeup after the racist problems, the city manager who appointed the current chief is black and the second in command is black. They have also said this is a witch hunt and they refused to accept the resignation of the chief. That last sentence is absolutely NOT true. They refused to accept his resignation because they want to wait until the truth comes out, let alone the scuffle about his severance package. Here is part of the city meeting minutes: O'DONNELL: So how do we interpret this vote? Was it a vote against 54,000 dollars? Was it suddenly a vote of confidence in a police chief where this same police commission voted no confidence? BONAPARTE: I think it was neither. What I heard at the meeting was some members of the commission wanting to go through the process and see what an independent investigation would show. Did the chief do something wrong? Did he not do things he should have done? That's something that we've been asking for some time. I came to the realization that with the ongoing criminal investigation , it was going to be difficult for a criminal -- for the city to get answers to those questions because of the evidence. The evidence is still going to be tied up until the trial. And therefore I thought, working with the chief, we could move forward by having this separation agreement . The whole thing can be seen he http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-last-...2312/#47152312 |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:28:05 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:26:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, jps wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. I suppose it all comes down to the difference between pursuit and simply following with the intent of maintaining visual contact. Zimmerman has the legal right to watch someone and that is the legal test. His story is that he lost sight of Martin and was approached from behind as he returned to his truck. Until the government comes up with evidence to break this story, the case will go nowhere. The state's investigator said he did not have any evidence about who initiated the confrontation at the bail hearing. Maybe Corey thinks she can have a "Jack McCoy" moment if she gets Zimmerman on the stand but the chances are that he will never testify. The only real question now is if this simply gets tossed at an immunity hearing and when that might happen. He didn't just pursue him, he confronted him with a loaded pistol in his possession. Zimmerman's account will be shredded by his own call to 911. He invited this tragedy and deserves to account for the killing of a teenager who had every right to be where he was. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:26:00 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. I suppose it all comes down to the difference between pursuit and simply following with the intent of maintaining visual contact. Zimmerman has the legal right to watch someone and that is the legal test. And Martin had the legal right to be walking around at night. In the rain, Very interesting!~ |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/12 4:10 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:16:49 -0400, wrote: In , says... Zimmerman has the legal right to watch someone and that is the legal test. And Martin had the legal right to be walking around at night. They were both on firm legal grounds until Martin punched Zimmerman in the nose. Was that alleged event before or after the asshole pulled a gun on him? |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
On 4/30/12 4:16 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:14:35 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:28:05 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:26:00 -0700, wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:47:44 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:21:51 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:01:00 -0400, wrote: ... a kid who was beating the **** out of him. How many times would your head have to hit the pavement before you thought you were "in danger of great bodily harm"? I guess I shouldn't be surprised you bought that bull****. If Zimmerman would have shown any signs whatsoever of being subject to the kind of trauma that would result in a concussion (which beating the **** out of him would indeed imply) he'd have shown signs of it and would have been taken immediately to the hospital for tests and observation. According to everyone who witnessed him, he was alert and doing well. Whatever Greg, understand you need to be against the black kid because you're a conservative in the south. The legal question is not actual bodily harm, only the FEAR of great bodily harm. There are pictures of two cuts in the back of his head from the concrete. He was not required to wait for a concussion before he had the right to defend himself. Maybe it is different up where you live. I speak of the EMT's who attended to him. Any sign of trauma to the head and they would immediately take him to the hospital since the liability could create a catastrophic situation for whomever the EMTs work for. He pursued the kid with a weapon against the advise of the 911 dispatcher and then found himself in a situation where he feared for his life? Does that sound as stupid to you as it's going to sound to a jury or will you convince yourself otherwise? They guy promoted and invited the situation but you think "stand your ground" is going to rule the day? Ridiculous. I suppose it all comes down to the difference between pursuit and simply following with the intent of maintaining visual contact. Zimmerman has the legal right to watch someone and that is the legal test. His story is that he lost sight of Martin and was approached from behind as he returned to his truck. Until the government comes up with evidence to break this story, the case will go nowhere. The state's investigator said he did not have any evidence about who initiated the confrontation at the bail hearing. Maybe Corey thinks she can have a "Jack McCoy" moment if she gets Zimmerman on the stand but the chances are that he will never testify. The only real question now is if this simply gets tossed at an immunity hearing and when that might happen. He didn't just pursue him, he confronted him with a loaded pistol in his possession. Zimmerman's account will be shredded by his own call to 911. He invited this tragedy and deserves to account for the killing of a teenager who had every right to be where he was. Cite? I saw nowhere in that phone call where Zimmerman said any more than that he was following Martin. He never said he approached Martin. In fact his statement was that Martin confronted Zimmerman. For your own reasons you have decided that Zimmerman chased and shot Martin for no reason yet there is no evidence to support that. When the defendant is a white guy, he suddenly loses his right to the benefit of a doubt from the left. You prefer speculation from people who were 1500-3000 miles away. I wouldn't have stopped to chat with Zimmerman either. He probably would have taken a shot at me. I'd probably carry in Florida just because there are so many "heeled" nutcases down there. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
In article , dump-on-
says... On 4/30/12 4:10 PM, wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:16:49 -0400, wrote: In , says... Zimmerman has the legal right to watch someone and that is the legal test. And Martin had the legal right to be walking around at night. They were both on firm legal grounds until Martin punched Zimmerman in the nose. Was that alleged event before or after the asshole pulled a gun on him? Well, it's just hearsay anyway. |
The Right Wing Darling Zimmerman
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com