On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:44:46 -0400, JustWait
wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:14 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of
unionized, make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing each
other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for
innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not
advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild
the middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country that
exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are
you really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd
like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line
workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family
supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government
paid health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the
concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages and
livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are
pretty much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a
country
worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans, don't
you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school,
never got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled
engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are
some really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the assembly
line
or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For
example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious jobs
that you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation
packages that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in the
driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on the
weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and all
on a C
average high school education. The middle class
union-driven greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist. What a
surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my life
fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get and
hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed, managed
to
obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable
business
for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property
theft,
managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help my
wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed to
put away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think
your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox
News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise
sucks."

Good job, Harry.

Bull**** stories suck even more.. But harry is the king..

What are your accomplishments? No career, no job, a hippie
daughter and
another who for whatever reasons, probably not of her making,
isn't
winning the races you need to get real $ponsorShip so you can
live off
that?



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of
majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years
back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.

The excessive and tacky makeup was probably Krause playing with
Photoshop, trying to doll the kid up a bit.

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

In article ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

On 4/20/2012 12:16 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

Whooo boy... snerk that about says it all as to his above fantasies...

On 4/20/12 12:34 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 12:16 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of
majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years
back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

Whooo boy... snerk that about says it all as to his above fantasies...


D'oh. You boys are dumber than dirt.

What does a photo of a teen-aged girl who is not my granddaughter have
to do with my much younger grandson who is language-adept?

Answer: nothing.

Which is what the two of you have between your ears: nothing.

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 4/20/12 12:34 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 12:16 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of
majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years
back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

Whooo boy... snerk that about says it all as to his above fantasies...


D'oh. You boys are dumber than dirt.

What does a photo of a teen-aged girl who is not my granddaughter have
to do with my much younger grandson who is language-adept?

Answer: nothing.

Which is what the two of you have between your ears: nothing.

Nope, YOU Harry, stated right here that a grandchild of yours was
learning a second language at a very young age..... When I have time,
I'll dig it up for you!

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.

On 4/20/12 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.



Never did that, **** for brains. But I do so love the "myths" that the
right-wing trash makes up.

On 4/20/2012 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.


Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?