On 4/12/12 9:24 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:20:38 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.


Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.

Wow, I'd hate to live in your paranoid world, needing a CWP.


Actually, I did it as a challenge. I like challenges.

On 4/12/12 9:28 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/12/2012 9:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager
who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The
event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had
shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That
doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.


Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.

Well of course it was harry. You were a secret agent, remember? LOL!!!
And of course, we believe you, we really do... snerk


Not to worry, little toad. When you break into someone's house, as I am
sure you will someday, the occupants won't need a carry permit to take
care of you.

On 4/12/2012 11:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:20:38 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:

Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.


What was your answer to;

6. Has, based on the results of investigation, “good and substantial
reason� to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is
“necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.� [5]

What the heck is apprehended danger?

I wonder why he wasn't caught lying on his permit application.

--
http://tinyurl.com/75bq9db

On 4/12/12 11:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:20:38 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:

Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.


What was your answer to;

6. Has, based on the results of investigation, “good and substantial
reason� to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is
“necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.� [5]


Why, "rec.boats," of course. :)

On Friday, April 13, 2012 6:13:08 AM UTC-4, Oscar wrote:
On 4/12/2012 11:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:20:38 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:

Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.


What was your answer to;

6. Has, based on the results of investigation, “good and substantial
reason” to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is
“necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.” [5]

What the heck is apprehended danger?

I wonder why he wasn't caught lying on his permit application.

He's sure been caught lying everywhere else.

On Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:55:45 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:20:38 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:

Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.


What was your answer to;

6. Has, based on the results of investigation, “good and substantial
reason” to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is
“necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.” [5]

There we have it... another harry lie debunked.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:54:10 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:37:20 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:


Zimmerman has been arrested and charged with 2nd degree murder, He once
again is being represented by competent counsel, Mark O'Mara. There's
nothing going on in the legal system that is contrary to his civil
rights. The process is in place. No one is so desperate they need you to
"defend" them.


I am just frustrated that this witch hunt will cost the Florida tax
payers millions that could have been spent on more worthy projects
(schools, roads etc) on a case that will probably fail.

The first SA looked at the evidence and said it was a loser. I think
he was right. The police report will be defense exhibit A and unless
they can find something we have not seen so far to break Zimmerman's
story, this could be dismissed at the end of the state's case for lack
of evidence.

This is pure election year politics. The only question is who it
benefits.

It won't fail. There had to be some very damning evidence to charge him
with Murder II and not manslaughter which is much easier to prove. So, I
guess you think murder cases shouldn't be tried because of the cost? So
we just let them go? How about bank robbers? Child molesters? Those
trials cost a boat load of money too.

We are going to see what evidence they have today. Unless it is a lot
more than they have announced, it is squat.
The damning evidence was the lynch mob that Sharpton assembled.

How would you lefties feel if it was a black guy shooting an unarmed
teenager (like Carl Rowan did) and it was a white rally outside the
police station demanding an arrest? You would call them KKK skinheads

Carl Rowen was a good liberal who only shot at teenagers who had jumped
the fence so they could use his pool. It didn't matter than Carl Rowen
had an illegal handgun and illegally discharged it within city limits.
Carl Rowen was a good liberal so it was swept under the rug.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, Oscar wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.

Harry does not have a Maryland Concealed Carry Permit. Harry may have a
Maryland Collectors Permit which allows him to purchase more than one
hand gun a month. A Maryland Collectors Permit does not allow one to
carry a concealed weapon/gun. Harry may have a Concealed Carry Permit
from another state but those are not recognized in Maryland at this
time.

Don't believe everything Harry says.

On 4/13/12 7:42 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.

Harry does not have a Maryland Concealed Carry Permit. Harry may have a
Maryland Collectors Permit which allows him to purchase more than one
hand gun a month. A Maryland Collectors Permit does not allow one to
carry a concealed weapon/gun. Harry may have a Concealed Carry Permit
from another state but those are not recognized in Maryland at this
time.

Don't believe everything Harry says.




Hehehe. Morons. I have a collector's permit and a carry permit. ESAD.

On Apr 13, 8:48*am, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 4/13/12 7:42 AM, BAR wrote:





In ,
says...

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, *wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
*wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.

A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.

Harry does not have a Maryland Concealed Carry Permit. Harry may have a
Maryland Collectors Permit which allows him to purchase more than one
hand gun a month. A Maryland Collectors Permit does not allow one to
carry a concealed weapon/gun. Harry may have a Concealed Carry Permit
from another state but those are not recognized in Maryland at this
time.

Don't believe everything Harry says.

Hehehe. Morons. I have a collector's permit and a carry permit. ESAD.

Those Southern boys sure are nervous about your gun permits.
Maybe if they acted in a responsible, decent, adult manner, they'd
have nothing to worry about. ;-)