Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote: On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: Whatever else is involved, there is no disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was precipitated by Zimmerman. I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note). In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive. Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat. A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street. He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-) We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting beaten before he pulled his gat. Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:20:38 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote: On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: Whatever else is involved, there is no disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was precipitated by Zimmerman. I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note). In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive. Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat. A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street. He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-) We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting beaten before he pulled his gat. Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. Wow, I'd hate to live in your paranoid world, needing a CWP. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/12/12 9:24 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:20:38 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote: On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: Whatever else is involved, there is no disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was precipitated by Zimmerman. I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note). In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive. Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat. A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street. He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-) We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting beaten before he pulled his gat. Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. Wow, I'd hate to live in your paranoid world, needing a CWP. Actually, I did it as a challenge. I like challenges. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , dump-on-
says... On 4/12/12 9:24 PM, wrote: On Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:20:38 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote: On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: Whatever else is involved, there is no disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was precipitated by Zimmerman. I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note). In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive. Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat. A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street. He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-) We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting beaten before he pulled his gat. Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. Wow, I'd hate to live in your paranoid world, needing a CWP. Actually, I did it as a challenge. I like challenges. But you just stated it was a "modest" effort. Where's a challenge in a "modest effort"? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/12/2012 9:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote: On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: Whatever else is involved, there is no disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was precipitated by Zimmerman. I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note). In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive. Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat. A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street. He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-) We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting beaten before he pulled his gat. Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. Well of course it was harry. You were a secret agent, remember? LOL!!! And of course, we believe you, we really do... snerk |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/12/12 9:28 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/12/2012 9:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote: On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: Whatever else is involved, there is no disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was precipitated by Zimmerman. I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note). In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive. Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat. A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street. He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-) We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting beaten before he pulled his gat. Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. Well of course it was harry. You were a secret agent, remember? LOL!!! And of course, we believe you, we really do... snerk Not to worry, little toad. When you break into someone's house, as I am sure you will someday, the occupants won't need a carry permit to take care of you. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/12/2012 11:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:20:38 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. What was your answer to; 6. Has, based on the results of investigation, “good and substantial reason” to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is “necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.” [5] What the heck is apprehended danger? I wonder why he wasn't caught lying on his permit application. -- http://tinyurl.com/75bq9db |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, April 13, 2012 6:13:08 AM UTC-4, Oscar wrote:
On 4/12/2012 11:55 PM, wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:20:38 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. What was your answer to; 6. Has, based on the results of investigation, good and substantial reason to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger. [5] What the heck is apprehended danger? I wonder why he wasn't caught lying on his permit application. He's sure been caught lying everywhere else. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/12/12 11:55 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:20:38 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote: Actually, it was a modest effort. The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people who tried and failed In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest. What was your answer to; 6. Has, based on the results of investigation, “good and substantial reason” to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is “necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.” [5] Why, "rec.boats," of course. :) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So why did Zimmerman...... | General | |||
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say | General | |||
More about the Zimmerman saga | General | |||
Well, well, Zimmerman defenders..... | General | |||
Lunatic arrested and charged for threatening Senator's life | General |