Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:57:32 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion- forums@ynuu20, says... On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working over, according to FOX? So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack. Yes, I did. Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves? No, I never said that. You asked why he was raising money for a defense if he was innocent, implying that he shouldn't. "If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers?" Because he wants to put up a vigorous defense, which you claim he is entitled to do. You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper. You clearly implied it. Now admit your whole posit was stupid, and move on. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zimmerman not the one calling for help, experts say | General | |||
Zimmerman has a political future with the GOP | General | |||
More about the Zimmerman saga | General | |||
Well, well, Zimmerman defenders..... | General | |||
Here's Harry in his Zimmerman like lobster boat......... | General |