| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
News we already knew about facts no longer in dispute
On 4/9/12 1:23 PM, wrote:
On Monday, April 9, 2012 10:46:51 AM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 06:17:18 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Monday, April 9, 2012 8:50:22 AM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 05:18:31 -0700 (PDT), wrote: vitriol and disinformation If they are against "vitriol and disinformation," I'll at least listen to what they say. The rest of that quote was "of right wing media". That means that they are also delivering a product that is designed for a particular audience. Now, if they also went after the slant and bias of the main-stream liberal media, that would be quite admirable. As it is, they are telling a group of people what they want to hear, but not the whole truth. All you see is "of right wing media". I see they are against "vitriol and disinformation." I'm good with some bias, if they just deal with the facts. If they cherry-pick the "facts" with a bias in mind, then their readers are still being led by the nose, just in another direction. They told you this, but you choose not to see it. Eh, mox nix to me. As anyone can tell from several posters here, Fox News exploits ignorance. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Go ahead...dispute this | General | |||
| END OUR DISPUTE | General | |||
| Sad news if you knew Graham Hall | General | |||
| Sad news if you knew Graham Hall | ASA | |||
| OT Fox news watchers more likely to believe false facts | General | |||
Linear Mode
