On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:02:29 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:41:44 -0400, Happy John
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:08:53 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:54:27 -0400, Happy John
wrote:

...so I could send my daughters to Mexico for Spring Break!

http://tinyurl.com/cuhktdh

Low blow, John. These are certainly not the first children and friends
to ever tour.

If Bush's kid had done this at this age, the media and liberals would be bouncing off the walls.
I've yet to hear of any 13 year-old going to Mexico with 25 Secret Service protectors at our
expense.

Low blow my ass.

So, you were OK with the liberals going off about Jenna having an
underage drink?

IMO, that was a low blow, too.

I don't recall the incident. Don't pay too much attention to the liberal media. I'm sure MSNBC had a
field day with it.

I see little relationship between an underage drink and a taxpayer funded trip to Mexico with 25
Secret Service protectors.

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:02:29 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:41:44 -0400, Happy John
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:08:53 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:54:27 -0400, Happy John
wrote:

...so I could send my daughters to Mexico for Spring Break!

http://tinyurl.com/cuhktdh

Low blow, John. These are certainly not the first children and friends
to ever tour.

If Bush's kid had done this at this age, the media and liberals would be bouncing off the walls.
I've yet to hear of any 13 year-old going to Mexico with 25 Secret Service protectors at our
expense.

Low blow my ass.

So, you were OK with the liberals going off about Jenna having an
underage drink?

IMO, that was a low blow, too.

I don't recall the incident. Don't pay too much attention to the liberal media. I'm sure MSNBC had a
field day with it.

I see little relationship between an underage drink and a taxpayer funded trip to Mexico with 25
Secret Service protectors.

Of course, your face is buried in the sand.