|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 5:53 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:39:12 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 5:37 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:19:09 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:11:16 -0500, wrote: In , says... I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 People practicing their religion is scary to you? Better not go to a church in the U.S. then! I find all fundamentalism very scary. I don't find these wackos any scarier than born again Christians. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...ous-play-paris What's scary is that these folks block access to business, streets, homes, etc,, and the law is afraid to do anything. In your example, the law took action - arresting those who infringed on the rights of others. That is quite appropriate. Note also that the Catholics haven't killed anyone over the blasphemy. Catholics haven't killed anyone over blasphemy? Not much of a student of history, hey, John? Learn to read, then learn to quote. You seem to take great pleasure in putting your ignorance on display. History is a continuum. Islam did not grow by the word it grew by the sword. As did Christianity. Where? Have you ever heard about the Crusades? |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article , dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote: In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well? Typical. You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are an idiot. This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means. If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms. Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills. The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth control pills? Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms. Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual adventures. Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life. How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years? Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his sex fascination. Reproductive health? Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends. Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer. So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting? Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought so. Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits lately? Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity debate! Who said I was a Christian? I don't know. Who, and what does it have to do with my statement that personal attacks should help clear up the great Christianity debate? |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/4/12 9:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... In , says... In , says... On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, wrote: In , says... In , says... In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote: In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well? Typical. You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are an idiot. This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means. If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms. Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills. The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth control pills? Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms. Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual adventures. Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life. How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years? Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his sex fascination. Reproductive health? Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends. Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer. So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting? Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought so. Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits lately? Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity debate! Who said I was a Christian? I believe you once claimed you were Catholic, but I believe what you are saying...you are in fact the antithesis of a person who follows the teachings of Jesus. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , dump-on-
says... On 3/4/12 9:17 AM, BAR wrote: In , dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 8:13 PM, BAR wrote: In articleJtednSeDQLjfPM_SnZ2dnUVZ_jQAAAAA@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 5:53 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:39:12 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 5:37 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:19:09 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:11:16 -0500, wrote: In , says... I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 People practicing their religion is scary to you? Better not go to a church in the U.S. then! I find all fundamentalism very scary. I don't find these wackos any scarier than born again Christians. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...ous-play-paris What's scary is that these folks block access to business, streets, homes, etc,, and the law is afraid to do anything. In your example, the law took action - arresting those who infringed on the rights of others. That is quite appropriate. Note also that the Catholics haven't killed anyone over the blasphemy. Catholics haven't killed anyone over blasphemy? Not much of a student of history, hey, John? Learn to read, then learn to quote. You seem to take great pleasure in putting your ignorance on display. History is a continuum. Islam did not grow by the word it grew by the sword. You mean, like christianity in south and central america? You should do some research before you stick your foot in your mouth, again. Check out the history of the Iberian peninsula before using them as an example for your argument. Are you referring to the Spanish Inquisition, a long period of religious horror inflicted by the Catholic Spaniards on some of the peoples of Europe and Central and South America? :) No, I am not referring to the Spanish Inquisition. Go back and read the history of the Iberian peninsula. European history is resplendent with examples of blood spilled over the efforts of "christians" to find the one true faith. Europe is resplendent with invasion and incursion and subjugation by the sword throughout its history. In fact the world knows the sword as the means of keeping populations under control. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... On 3/4/12 9:51 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, wrote: In , says... In , says... In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote: In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well? Typical. You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are an idiot. This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means. If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms. Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills. The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth control pills? Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms. Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual adventures. Maybe that is why you don't get it! I'll make it simple. Reproductive Health is a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system at all stages of life. How did the human race get to the point where find ourselves today with the help and guidance form the progressives over the last 100 years? Ignorance, therefore, is believing that "birth control pills" are prescribed only for birth control. Maybe perverts like Rush Limbaugh should quit calling them birth control pills and merely call them hormones which is what they really are. Maybe he could get over his sex fascination. Reproductive health? Why take hormones? Doctors prescribe them to lower the risk of some cancers, to treat some skin diseases, lessen the pain and stress of periods, to relieve endometriosis, PCOS relief, and other good medical reasons, not relating to sexual gyrations that I'm sure you'd like to watch with Rush, in his Circle of Friends. Birth control pills have been proved to cause breast cancer. So what is all this fascination and anxiety associated with the possibility that women are giving up a little that you aren't getting? Slut means she putting out and YOU aren't getting any? Yep, thought so. Has your landlord let you out of the basement for any congegal visits lately? Personal attacks, that should help clear up the great Christianity debate! Who said I was a Christian? I believe you once claimed you were Catholic, but I believe what you are saying...you are in fact the antithesis of a person who follows the teachings of Jesus. I am a Deist. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , dump-on- says... On 3/4/12 10:01 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/4/2012 9:56 AM, X ` Man wrote: Oh. I should have known you wouldn't be able to differentiate between the religious and the secular. Atheism is a religion, and it's getting shoved down my kids throats every day... So is the Church of Al Gore... Atheism is not a religion. Atheism is the absence of religion. D'oh. Who or what created the universe? Please show me some peer reviewed studies that answers that question. Who or what do YOU think "created the universe"? |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/4/12 1:45 PM, BAR wrote:
In articles_6dne4M8ca5GM7SnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/4/12 10:01 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/4/2012 9:56 AM, X ` Man wrote: Oh. I should have known you wouldn't be able to differentiate between the religious and the secular. Atheism is a religion, and it's getting shoved down my kids throats every day... So is the Church of Al Gore... Atheism is not a religion. Atheism is the absence of religion. D'oh. Who or what created the universe? I don't know that a "who" or "what" was involved; neither does anyone else. I don't accept the posit that if we don't understand something yet, we should assign the "cause" to superstition. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/4/12 1:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:01:20 -0500, wrote: In , says... In , says... In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote: In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well? Typical. You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are an idiot. This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means. If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms. Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills. The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth control pills? Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms. Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual adventures. The following sponsors: Sleep Train, ProFlowers, Quicken Loans, Sleep Number, Legal Zoom, Citrix Systems Inc., the NBA Cleveland Cavaliers, and more, are dumping Limbaugh and his big, greasy, racist, misogynist, right-wingnut, mouth. Wonder why? Limbaugh the pig's half-assed "apology" was almost hilarious. I'm so happy the GOP has such a stellar character as its intellectual and moral opinion maker. I wonder who the GOP'ers are going to offend next. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com