|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 5:53 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:39:12 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 5:37 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:19:09 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:11:16 -0500, wrote: In , says... I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 People practicing their religion is scary to you? Better not go to a church in the U.S. then! I find all fundamentalism very scary. I don't find these wackos any scarier than born again Christians. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...ous-play-paris What's scary is that these folks block access to business, streets, homes, etc,, and the law is afraid to do anything. In your example, the law took action - arresting those who infringed on the rights of others. That is quite appropriate. Note also that the Catholics haven't killed anyone over the blasphemy. Catholics haven't killed anyone over blasphemy? Not much of a student of history, hey, John? Learn to read, then learn to quote. You seem to take great pleasure in putting your ignorance on display. It comes naturally for him. -- O M G |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article om, 5@
5.com says... On 3/3/2012 6:00 PM, BAR wrote: In b.com, says... On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:09:50 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:48 AM, BAR wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 3/2/2012 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:30:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. Can,t get the link to work. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/29ghyhx Got it. And the cops were ordered to do nothing? That's the french for you. Cheese eating surrender monkeys. The United States hasn't won a serious shooting war against a serious opponent since World War II, and that war required many allies. I take it you object to the use of the word monkey. Harry thinks we should still be conducting war according to 15th century rules. The world evolves and so does war. There is not such thing as the front-line anymore. What will he do now. He's been diligently practicing his shooting. And now he finds out there is no need for his services. He always seems to be a dollar short and a day late. He should have volunteered back in the sixties when we could have used him. Harry is still waiting for someone to knock on his door so that he can blow them away with his big gun. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote: In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well? Typical. You are an idiot. I'll repeat it just to make sure it sinks in, you are an idiot. This has nothing to do with "reproductive health" whatever that means. If birth control pills are not covered then they are not covered. If Ms. Fluke wants birth control pills then she is free to purchase them herself. No one is preventing her from purchasing birth control pills. The question on the table is why can't Ms. Fluke pay for her own birth control pills? Birth control pills are not the only method of contraception if Ms. Fluke doesn't want to get pregnant while engaging in her sexual adventures. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. Bull****! Ever hear of this: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" And if you really want to delve into the matter, go he http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...uotations.html You did read the first word didn't you. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 3/3/2012 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? That suggestion about Santorm is just more DNC hyper-bull**** spread by the MSM... Holy ****, have you ever actually LISTENED to the guy? "We were put on this Earth as creatures of God to have dominion over the Earth." "The radical feminists succeeded in undermining the traditional family and convincing women that professional accomplishments are the key to happiness." This is not a political war at all. This is not a cultural war. This is a spiritual war." http://santorumexposed.com/?p=710 The country has fallen apart with the "progressives" pushing that the nuclear family is not as important as the community or society. Say what you want but, all of our cultural problems have occurred since the family was yanked apart by the social dogooders. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 3/3/2012 9:02 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? Try telling a joke about Catholics, then tell the same one about Muslims here and you will see... I have a Muslim friend and I can say anything I want to him about his religion because he's knows I'm intelligent enough to know that the few terrorists that are seen on TV aren't the real Muslims. Ask your Muslim friend if he will criticize the terrorists actions. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , dump-on-
says... On 3/3/12 5:53 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:39:12 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 5:37 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:19:09 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:11:16 -0500, wrote: In , says... I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 People practicing their religion is scary to you? Better not go to a church in the U.S. then! I find all fundamentalism very scary. I don't find these wackos any scarier than born again Christians. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...ous-play-paris What's scary is that these folks block access to business, streets, homes, etc,, and the law is afraid to do anything. In your example, the law took action - arresting those who infringed on the rights of others. That is quite appropriate. Note also that the Catholics haven't killed anyone over the blasphemy. Catholics haven't killed anyone over blasphemy? Not much of a student of history, hey, John? Learn to read, then learn to quote. You seem to take great pleasure in putting your ignorance on display. History is a continuum. Islam did not grow by the word it grew by the sword. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 8:08 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... In , says... On 3/3/2012 9:02 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? Try telling a joke about Catholics, then tell the same one about Muslims here and you will see... I have a Muslim friend and I can say anything I want to him about his religion because he's knows I'm intelligent enough to know that the few terrorists that are seen on TV aren't the real Muslims. Ask your Muslim friend if he will criticize the terrorists actions. He has a Muslim friend... !? LOL! |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... On 3/3/12 1:16 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. I'm hoping the young lady who Limbaugh slandered big time will initiate a massive lawsuit against him. She is a private citizen and Limbaugh the Pig will not be able to hide behind a claim that she was a public figure when she testified before Congress. The woman should have all the help she needs from her faculty and fellow students at Georgetown Law. I'm also pleased to read that at least a handful of Limbaugh the Pig's advertisers have decided to part ways with him. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/sand...ake-victim-of- georgetowns-policy-on-contraceptives/ Looks like Ms. Fluke went looking for a fight and she got what she wanted. There's no real civil penalty in most cases for insulting a public figure on the airways. There are for what Limbaugh the Pig did. With the knowledge that she was looking for a fight there she has no reasonable expectation of privacy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com