On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:32:04 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 18/11/2011 6:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...


Tea Party is the least corrupt. Just that they don't have the power
needed to stop the Reid, Pelosi, Gingrich, 0bama and other corrupt
mostly old-timer insiders.


least corrupt? it's funded by the koch bros...what the hell planet do
you live on?

Best hope, vote Tea Party or if a GOP old timer like Gingrich, vote
Democrat. That is, tend to the right but clean house.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:43:13 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:56:39 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 17/11/2011 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!

Chump change compared to Pelosi.

So that makes it okay in your book? Now, just how much did Pelosi profit
from Freddie?

Pelosi cashed in on the Visa IPO, at the same time when the house was
writing legislation that made them a lot of money.

That's a very loose interpretation of the facts.

What is your interpretation of the facts?

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:33:31 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:21:32 -0500, wrote:

Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!
All of the people who run Fannie and Freddie are making 7 figure
salaries. Have you been watching the hearings? The whole bureaucracy
is corrupt. It is just another bloated government program that doesn't
really accomplish it's stated goals.
There are a number of countries with greater home ownership numbers
and without the heavy hand of government incentives and programs like
this.
the percentage of home ownership in this countryhas been about
constant for over 30 years

wall street greet, however, hasn't. it's exploded...and blew up the
economy with it

I assume you meant to type "greed". Your typing is lame. You should
try to find the shift key on your keyboard.

"Wall Street" is a street in NYC. You are probably trying to refer to
big corporations, right? These corporations all have competitors so
there are no monopolies involved. How can you say they are greedy when
they have competition? Your personal lack of ambition, and your
resulting financial situation, has nothing to do with the rest of the
world, Bob.

-HB

On 19/11/2011 7:42 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:33:31 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:21:32 -0500, wrote:

Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million
dollars!!
All of the people who run Fannie and Freddie are making 7 figure
salaries. Have you been watching the hearings? The whole bureaucracy
is corrupt. It is just another bloated government program that doesn't
really accomplish it's stated goals.
There are a number of countries with greater home ownership numbers
and without the heavy hand of government incentives and programs like
this.
the percentage of home ownership in this countryhas been about
constant for over 30 years

wall street greet, however, hasn't. it's exploded...and blew up the
economy with it

I assume you meant to type "greed". Your typing is lame. You should try
to find the shift key on your keyboard.

"Wall Street" is a street in NYC. You are probably trying to refer to
big corporations, right? These corporations all have competitors so
there are no monopolies involved. How can you say they are greedy when
they have competition? Your personal lack of ambition, and your
resulting financial situation, has nothing to do with the rest of the
world, Bob.

-HB

HB, he is a 1%er, that is a 1% at the bottom. bpuharic is here to
remind us why we did it right.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:42:28 -0500, Honey Badger
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:33:31 -0500, wrote:

wall street greet, however, hasn't. it's exploded...and blew up the
economy with it

I assume you meant to type "greed". Your typing is lame. You should
try to find the shift key on your keyboard.

aw whatsamatter? cant dig up an argument so whine about TYPING???

figures

"Wall Street" is a street in NYC.

dont know too much about the financial sector do you? no wonder
you're right win

You are probably trying to refer to
big corporations, right? These corporations all have competitors so
there are no monopolies involved.

let's see...8 US banks control 90% of US assets

so tell me again how 'too big to fail' means 'competition'?

oh. it doesnt...but it does if you're right wing.

gotcha


How can you say they are greedy when
they have competition? Your personal lack of ambition, and your
resulting financial situation, has nothing to do with the rest of the
world, Bob.

-HB

if they had competition

why did we have to bail them out?

go ahead right winger...answer that question. i'll wait

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:19:53 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


HB, he is a 1%er, that is a 1% at the bottom. bpuharic is here to
remind us why we did it right.


yeah we did it so right

we're in a depression

that's right wing ideology

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:28:53 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



And why less government is better government.

gee. why not legalize murder?

It is already legal.

With so much power over
peoples economic lives, the greed in DC is screwing America blind. And
it attracts criminals with all sorts of scams.

uh no. the right gave the election process to the rich in this
country. you're too stupid to follow current american news.

Who raised about $1,000,000,000 dollars for his 2008 presidential
campaign?

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:52:42 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:28:53 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



And why less government is better government.

gee. why not legalize murder?

It is already legal.

yeah if you're rich...

With so much power over
peoples economic lives, the greed in DC is screwing America blind. And
it attracts criminals with all sorts of scams.

uh no. the right gave the election process to the rich in this
country. you're too stupid to follow current american news.

Who raised about $1,000,000,000 dollars for his 2008 presidential
campaign?

the GOP. and the party continues, courtesy of the 'citizens united'
decision...

decided by 5 right wing justices