Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!

On 17/11/2011 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!

Chump change compared to Pelosi.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

In article ,
says...

On 17/11/2011 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!

Chump change compared to Pelosi.

So that makes it okay in your book? Now, just how much did Pelosi profit
from Freddie?

On 18/11/2011 6:56 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 17/11/2011 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!

Chump change compared to Pelosi.

So that makes it okay in your book? Now, just how much did Pelosi profit
from Freddie?

I really don't know the exact amount. But you don't get gains like this
as a passive investor without insider information.

http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011...charles-rangel

Pretty obvious Pelosi is above the law.

When the leaders of the houses are corrupt, and 0bama spends billion of
debt funded moneys on bailout for buddies like Solyndra....safe to say
DC is corrupt to the core.

The corruption is clearly pervasive.

And why less government is better government. With so much power over
peoples economic lives, the greed in DC is screwing America blind. And
it attracts criminals with all sorts of scams.

And not too many politicians with the guts to stand up and just say,
"This town is a corruption cesspool than needs a massive 60% house
cleaning".
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:28:53 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



And why less government is better government.

gee. why not legalize murder?


With so much power over
peoples economic lives, the greed in DC is screwing America blind. And
it attracts criminals with all sorts of scams.

uh no. the right gave the election process to the rich in this
country. you're too stupid to follow current american news.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:28:53 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



And why less government is better government.

gee. why not legalize murder?

It is already legal.

With so much power over
peoples economic lives, the greed in DC is screwing America blind. And
it attracts criminals with all sorts of scams.

uh no. the right gave the election process to the rich in this
country. you're too stupid to follow current american news.

Who raised about $1,000,000,000 dollars for his 2008 presidential
campaign?

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:43:13 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:56:39 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 17/11/2011 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!

Chump change compared to Pelosi.

So that makes it okay in your book? Now, just how much did Pelosi profit
from Freddie?

Pelosi cashed in on the Visa IPO, at the same time when the house was
writing legislation that made them a lot of money.

That's a very loose interpretation of the facts.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:43:13 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:56:39 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 17/11/2011 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
Gee, the far right seems content to put all blame about the mortgage
crisis on the liberals. Sure seems like it wasn't all liberals who had
their hand in the pie as FOX would like you to believe. Seems like old
Newt has his hand in the cookie jar to the tune of 1.9 million dollars!!

Chump change compared to Pelosi.

So that makes it okay in your book? Now, just how much did Pelosi profit
from Freddie?

Pelosi cashed in on the Visa IPO, at the same time when the house was
writing legislation that made them a lot of money.

That's a very loose interpretation of the facts.

What is your interpretation of the facts?

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:49:19 -0800, jps wrote:

Pelosi cashed in on the Visa IPO, at the same time when the house was
writing legislation that made them a lot of money.

That's a very loose interpretation of the facts.

Sort of like the loose oversight of how our congress people are
investing in industries they regulate huh?

This is not just Democrats, they pretty much all do it.

What's worse is the insider stock deals that they are privy to long
before the rest of the public.

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:40:46 -0500 , wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:49:19 -0800, jps wrote:


Pelosi cashed in on the Visa IPO, at the same time when the house
was
writing legislation that made them a lot of money.

That's a very loose interpretation of the facts.


Sort of like the loose oversight of how our congress people are
investing in industries they regulate huh?


This is not just Democrats, they pretty much all do it.

Martha got jail for doing it. And she only benefited 100k-

--
2012, the end of an error:-) Yee Haw!