On 11/3/11 5:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote:

It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are
multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and
generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they
repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double
taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring
it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at
the cost of double taxation.


Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues.

Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself,
AGAIN. Way to go WAFA.

=========

Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know
everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-)


The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts,
Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll
favor them.

========

Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it
turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a
corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills
(lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a
personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on
a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause& Associates. That would be
the pits getting fired from your own company.


Oh, Beardsley,...give it up. I'm simply not a fan of the sort of
corporate abuse that has been perpetrated on this country since the
1980's. I've worked for corporations, and I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.
In fact, I just finished a draft of a speech one of my clients will be
presenting and will get paid in the five figures for it.

You seem to be "stuck" on a Florida corporation that hasn't been active
for well over a decade. That's your problem, not mine.

On 11/3/2011 5:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/3/11 5:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:04 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/3/11 4:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:53:59 -0400, wrote:

It's not that simple. A lot of Fortune 500 companies are
multi-nationals meaning that they do business internationally and
generate profits in different countries/currencies. If they
repatriate that money back to the US they get hit with double
taxation, first where they earned it, and again here when they bring
it back. A lot of them would like to bring profits back but not at
the cost of double taxation.


Beardsley's corporate apologetica continues.

Wayne made an intelligent assumption and you made a fool of yourself,
AGAIN. Way to go WAFA.

=========

Proving once again that you can't educate those who already know
everything, or those who don't know what they don't know. :-)


The only thing that you've proven in all your corporationist posts,
Beardsley, is that no matter what excesses corporations commit, you'll
favor them.

========

Usually when I run into someone with attitudes similar to yours it
turns out that they were never able to get, or hold, a job with a
corporation. Frequently the reason is related to personality, skills
(lack thereof) or work ethic. I'd guess that in your case it's a
personality issue. Hopefully Ms. Greer will be willing to keep you on
a while longer as CEO job at Harry Krause& Associates. That would be
the pits getting fired from your own company.


Oh, Beardsley,...give it up. I'm simply not a fan of the sort of
corporate abuse that has been perpetrated on this country since the
1980's. I've worked for corporations, and I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.
In fact, I just finished a draft of a speech one of my clients will be
presenting and will get paid in the five figures for it.

You seem to be "stuck" on a Florida corporation that hasn't been active
for well over a decade. That's your problem, not mine.



There you go Mr. Pufferfish. You've puffed yourself way up for that
little skirmish. Careful; you might explode.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?

On 11/3/11 6:38 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?


Certainly not a corporate apologist like you.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?

Hmmm, I notice that Harry is still engaging in prying into other's lives
and finding things like last names to post to the world! Okay, think
I'll call a couple of his clients and see if I have a need for their
services! I may mention Harry's and my connection in rec.boats to see if
I can get a discount........

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?

I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for
profit.....

On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?

I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for
profit.....

======

If so it is no doubt unintentional. Most people with out of state
corporations are trying to hide something, either taxable revenue or
assets.

I originally assumed revenue but it might be assets. That could
explain why the house is in his wife's name also.

On 11/4/11 11:21 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?

I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for
profit.....

======

If so it is no doubt unintentional. Most people with out of state
corporations are trying to hide something, either taxable revenue or
assets.

I originally assumed revenue but it might be assets. That could
explain why the house is in his wife's name also.


You obviously need an "I'm an Asshole Obsessed with Harry" membership
card. Maybe I'll send you one, Beardsley.

On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:24:36 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 11/4/11 11:21 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?

I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for
profit.....

======

If so it is no doubt unintentional. Most people with out of state
corporations are trying to hide something, either taxable revenue or
assets.

I originally assumed revenue but it might be assets. That could
explain why the house is in his wife's name also.


You obviously need an "I'm an Asshole Obsessed with Harry" membership
card. Maybe I'll send you one, Beardsley.

More name-calling, Harry? Is that the best you can do?

On 11/4/2011 11:24 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/4/11 11:21 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 08:57:31 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:59:10 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

I still have as clients
several corporations with whom I have been doing business for decades.

========

You have evil corporations as clients? Wow, that's just a bit of
hypocrisy don't you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

We all know that prostitutes do it for money, but Harry Krause? The
shame of it all. Who can you trust these days?

I take it that Harry's little consulting business is a not for
profit.....

======

If so it is no doubt unintentional. Most people with out of state
corporations are trying to hide something, either taxable revenue or
assets.

I originally assumed revenue but it might be assets. That could
explain why the house is in his wife's name also.


You obviously need an "I'm an Asshole Obsessed with Harry" membership
card. Maybe I'll send you one, Beardsley.

Singling out one guy for the honor? That's not fair. Why not put a copy
up on your photobucket so we can all download a copy.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error