Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 6:50*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:22:19 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:12:25 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:46:37 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:09:07 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:25:48 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:04:57 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:14:23 -0700, jps wrote: Paranoid city officials tightening people's ability to peacefully assemble on public property... Since when has "camping" been "speech"? These people are being told to leave the park at night when they are supposed to be closed. Are we going to set the precedent that anyone can sleep in city parks if they claim to have something to say? People, go home and come back tomorrow when the park opens again. Nobody is going to be there at 3AM to hear your protest but the cops and maybe a few vagrants. They were marching in the street, heading towards the park. *Your argument has nothing to do with the right to peacfully assemble. Was the park they were heading for supposed to be closed? Come on, Greg. *That's really a flimsy argument. They were protesting, walking on public streets. *You cannot arrest them, beat them up or fire a tear gas cannisters at their heads for what they might do. The article I read says they were attempting to reenter the park that they had been kicked out of. Of course that was on the right wing MSNBC so who knows. Would you feel as supportive if this was a group trying to put up Christmas decorations in the park? How about if it was the tea party? I am sure you would be lecturing us on the limits of free speech and the rule of law. The city had erected a chain-link fence around the plaza in the morning, and workers were mowing the grass and sweeping up remnants of the encampment that was dismantled the day before. After the encampment was cleared Tuesday, protesters began marching toward City Hall in an attempt to re-establish a presence in the area of the disbanded camp. They went overboard. *There was no threat to property, lives, etc. You just don't like the message, aparently. You just don't like it because the majority of Americans feel *the message* is worthless. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Corporate thugs...of course. | General | |||
Obama would not vet for VP | ASA | |||
Somebody call the vet . . . | ASA | |||
Judge Upholds Constitution against Bush Thugs | General | |||
Union thugs target Republicans | General |