Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default Real Liberalism

In article ,
says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....


And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."


So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...


Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2011
Posts: 1,786
Default Real Liberalism

On Oct 27, 10:04*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...







On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...


In ,
says...


On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.


Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..


But this means nothing to you?


Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.


If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?


Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.


Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....


And here's more!!!!


At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."


It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.


"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."


So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...


Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Hey... you go, girlfriend!
Bitch slap that little weasel until he cries uncle. ;-)
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default Real Liberalism

In article 76d4efdf-f2a6-43f4-b8a8-
,
says...

On Oct 27, 10:04*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...







On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...


In ,
says...


On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.


Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..


But this means nothing to you?


Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.


If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?


Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.


Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....


And here's more!!!!


At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."


It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.


"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."


So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...


Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Hey... you go, girlfriend!
Bitch slap that little weasel until he cries uncle. ;-)


Gee Suckling Don the Coward, now you are talking like a 13 year old
girl, and that's an improvement.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,581
Default Real Liberalism

On 10/27/2011 9:04 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....

And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."


So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...


Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.


Oh, now "he knew about it"... So, the Navy requested it, I get it...
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default Real Liberalism

In article ,
says...

On 10/27/2011 9:04 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....

And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."

So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...


Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.


Oh, now "he knew about it"... So, the Navy requested it, I get it...


You are completely insane!!!!! Bush ADMITTED knowing about it, Rumsfield
ADMITTED knowing about it and trying to get Bush to not use the banner.
Bush's aide has admitted having a hand in it as well as Bush's Press
Sectretary. Do you REALLY think that Bush didn't know about it? Even
after Rumsfield tried to talk him out of it?????


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,581
Default Real Liberalism

On 10/27/2011 10:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/27/2011 9:04 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....

And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."

So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...

Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.


Oh, now "he knew about it"... So, the Navy requested it, I get it...


You are completely insane!!!!! Bush ADMITTED knowing about it, Rumsfield
ADMITTED knowing about it and trying to get Bush to not use the banner.
Bush's aide has admitted having a hand in it as well as Bush's Press
Sectretary. Do you REALLY think that Bush didn't know about it? Even
after Rumsfield tried to talk him out of it?????


Who requested it, the Navy and so what if Bush didn't think it was a bad
idea or have someone pull it down as he walked to the podium? Bull,
let's talk about "Fast and Furious" if you want to talk about things
folks knew about and lied about too...
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default Real Liberalism

In article ,
says...

On 10/27/2011 10:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/27/2011 9:04 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....

And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."

So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...

Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.

Oh, now "he knew about it"... So, the Navy requested it, I get it...


You are completely insane!!!!! Bush ADMITTED knowing about it, Rumsfield
ADMITTED knowing about it and trying to get Bush to not use the banner.
Bush's aide has admitted having a hand in it as well as Bush's Press
Sectretary. Do you REALLY think that Bush didn't know about it? Even
after Rumsfield tried to talk him out of it?????


Who requested it, the Navy and so what if Bush didn't think it was a bad
idea or have someone pull it down as he walked to the podium? Bull,
let's talk about "Fast and Furious" if you want to talk about things
folks knew about and lied about too...


Changing the subject, ala Harry again, I see. And the only thing the
Navy requested was that the White House have it made.
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,581
Default Real Liberalism

On 10/27/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/27/2011 10:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/27/2011 9:04 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....

And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."

So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...

Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.

Oh, now "he knew about it"... So, the Navy requested it, I get it...

You are completely insane!!!!! Bush ADMITTED knowing about it, Rumsfield
ADMITTED knowing about it and trying to get Bush to not use the banner.
Bush's aide has admitted having a hand in it as well as Bush's Press
Sectretary. Do you REALLY think that Bush didn't know about it? Even
after Rumsfield tried to talk him out of it?????


Who requested it, the Navy and so what if Bush didn't think it was a bad
idea or have someone pull it down as he walked to the podium? Bull,
let's talk about "Fast and Furious" if you want to talk about things
folks knew about and lied about too...


Changing the subject, ala Harry again, I see. And the only thing the
Navy requested was that the White House have it made.


not at all changing the subject. You say President Bush had it made, I
say the Navy requested he do that...
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,020
Default Real Liberalism

On 10/27/11 12:55 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/27/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/27/2011 10:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/27/2011 9:04 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in
preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they
wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to
create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties
in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse?
Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship
was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO
fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who
had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush
Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....

And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the
decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier
where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a
"mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political
analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this
morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was
responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former
White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft
carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."

So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...

Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got
your
head in the sand so far you can see China.

Oh, now "he knew about it"... So, the Navy requested it, I get it...

You are completely insane!!!!! Bush ADMITTED knowing about it,
Rumsfield
ADMITTED knowing about it and trying to get Bush to not use the banner.
Bush's aide has admitted having a hand in it as well as Bush's Press
Sectretary. Do you REALLY think that Bush didn't know about it? Even
after Rumsfield tried to talk him out of it?????

Who requested it, the Navy and so what if Bush didn't think it was a bad
idea or have someone pull it down as he walked to the podium? Bull,
let's talk about "Fast and Furious" if you want to talk about things
folks knew about and lied about too...


Changing the subject, ala Harry again, I see. And the only thing the
Navy requested was that the White House have it made.


not at all changing the subject. You say President Bush had it made, I
say the Navy requested he do that...



I have a pair of matched pistols, revolver 45's, actually...if you and
iLoogy would like to settle your disputes with each like men,
arrangements could be made. All I ask is the video rights.


  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default Real Liberalism

In article ,
says...

On 10/27/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/27/2011 10:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/27/2011 9:04 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,

says...

On 10/26/2011 1:13 PM, iBoaterer wrote:


White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN that in preparing for the
speech, Navy officials on the carrier told Bush aides they wanted a
"Mission Accomplished" banner, and the White House agreed to create it.




Got it, it was a Navy request... Thanks for clarifying..

But this means nothing to you?

Bush offered the explanation after being asked whether his speech
declaring an end to major combat in Iraq under the "Mission
Accomplished" banner was premature, given that U.S. casualties in Iraq
since then have surpassed those before it.

If Bush didn't know about it, why did he offer up that excuse? Are you
really so blinded by your party that you can't see?

Add to that that every aspect of his appearence aboard the ship was VERY
well detailed and orchestrated, right down to his landing, TWO fly-by's,
his name already on the plane..... Right, the White House, (who had the
banner made) knew nothing of it.

Add to that the fact that the banner is now in the Bush Presidential
Library..... Nope, he knew nothing.... RIIGGGHHHT.....

And here's more!!!!

At his news conference yesterday, President Bush said the decision to
put a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier where he
gave a speech following the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a "mistake."

It was not his mistake, however, according to CBS News political analyst
Dan Bartlett, a former senior advisor to Mr. Bush. Asked this morning by
Harry Smith, co-anchor of CBS' The Early Show, who was responsible for
the banner ? Smith pointed out that both the Navy and former White House
Press Secretary Scott McClellan have taken the blame in the past ?
Bartlett said that it was actually his call.

"Quite frankly, yours truly was the guy who actually signed off" on
posting the banner, Bartlett said, after people on the aircraft carrier
approached the White House with the idea. "I regret it to this day,
because it did send the wrong message."

So, you don't know who signed off on the banner, but you know it was
Bush..Riiiight...

Yes, it was. If you think Bush didn't know about it, you have got your
head in the sand so far you can see China.

Oh, now "he knew about it"... So, the Navy requested it, I get it...

You are completely insane!!!!! Bush ADMITTED knowing about it, Rumsfield
ADMITTED knowing about it and trying to get Bush to not use the banner.
Bush's aide has admitted having a hand in it as well as Bush's Press
Sectretary. Do you REALLY think that Bush didn't know about it? Even
after Rumsfield tried to talk him out of it?????

Who requested it, the Navy and so what if Bush didn't think it was a bad
idea or have someone pull it down as he walked to the podium? Bull,
let's talk about "Fast and Furious" if you want to talk about things
folks knew about and lied about too...


Changing the subject, ala Harry again, I see. And the only thing the
Navy requested was that the White House have it made.


not at all changing the subject. You say President Bush had it made, I
say the Navy requested he do that...


Let me try to get this through your head ONE more time. Eisboch said,
and YOU agreed, that the banner was put up for the SHIP'S "Mission
Accomplished". As I've demonstrated several times in this thread, that
is just not the case.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A victim of liberalism wf3h General 2 August 29th 09 03:01 PM
A victim of liberalism Tim General 2 August 27th 09 03:25 PM
Liberalism plus Stupidity Atomic Abusement Park Clown General 9 July 29th 09 01:15 AM
Trickle down liberalism Frogwatch[_2_] General 24 July 7th 09 02:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017