Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18-Apr-2004, John Smith wrote:
So, it seems that I would be looking at either an Algonquin 15 or 16, or perhaps a Mattawa, if I were to get a Swift. The Mattawa looks to be a better canoe, I will have to try one. I haven't paddled a Mattawa, but I did paddle an Algonquin 17 for a weekend once. I didn't realize that the A-17 was not considered a "serious" canoe - its marketed as a high-end family or good recreational canoe. I found it handled quite well and had decent speed. I would have rated as good or better than many other companies' high-end tripper canoes! I can't say much about the 15 or 16 foot versions other than to suggest that if they're comparable to the 17, they're good enough for most paddlers. If I had to buy a lake tripper tomorrow, I'd get the Swift Kippawa. If there's one available, give it a look. They will be in Guelph, Ontario next weekend, which is about 1 hours drive from where I am. I bought my last boat - a Boreal Designs Ellesmere sea kayak from Swift at Guelph two years ago. If you're lucky, you;ll find a deal like I did. Mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Daly wrote:
I haven't paddled a Mattawa, but I did paddle an Algonquin 17 for a weekend once. I didn't realize that the A-17 was not considered a "serious" canoe - its marketed as a high-end family or good recreational canoe. I found it handled quite well and had decent speed. I would have rated as good or better than many other companies' high-end tripper canoes! I can't say much about the 15 or 16 foot versions other than to suggest that if they're comparable to the 17, they're good enough for most paddlers. If I had to buy a lake tripper tomorrow, I'd get the Swift Kippawa. If there's one available, give it a look. I bought my last boat - a Boreal Designs Ellesmere sea kayak from Swift at Guelph two years ago. If you're lucky, you;ll find a deal like I did. Mike Thanks again. I've been trying to keep it to 15' or 16'. While the wife enjoys canoeing, I do see myself going solo from time to time (or maybe more). To be honest, I haven't done extensive solo in any canoe recently, but I figure that a 17' (or more) may be a handful at time, at least more so than a shorter canoe. I could be way off on that last point. I'll be doing lake paddling most of the time, doing rivers/creeks to get to the next lake, but I don't see any whitewater in the foreseeable future. We do camping, but have found we can fit all our gear into a 15' comfortably. I will be fishing extensively from this canoe. My main canoeing experience from the past few years is using three different canoes. One is at the wife's family cottage. This is a green plastic 17' Coleman with round metal tubes bracing the inside. I find it heavy and the most difficult to paddle. I took it out two weekends ago for my first paddle (only choice). I find it generally barge-like. The other two are at my cousins cottage, which we frequently visit in the summer. They have a 16 or 17', not sure of the material. It's red and plasticy, sort of like the Coleman, but stiffer, with no metal bracing. It's lighter than the Coleman, and seems fairly durable. It may be Royalex/lite, I've never seen one up close, so I'm not sure exactly what they look like. Anyways, this is a stable canoe, it seems OK, but it's still quite heavy. The last is a Swift, approximately 10 years old. it's a 15', not sure which model. I'm not exactly sure of the material, but the inside is a screen-like mesh pattern. It seems very light, although it doesn't seem like it would appreciate being banged into a rock. This canoe has no keel, so when I first used it, I thought it felt 'tippy'. After awhile, I got used to it and find the canoe much more stable than the red one, especially when you lean over the side, say, to unhook a fish! I guess that's the Primary/Secondary stability. Anyways, sorry to ramble, just looking for some input on what may be suitable for me... Thanks Brian |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19-Apr-2004, John Smith wrote:
BTW, I should admit that I haven't canoed in years, since sea kayaking has taken over. I don't miss canoeing much - or at least, I don't miss the idiot in the front seat :-). The only thing I miss while sea kayaking is the ease of portaging my way away from the crowds (and power boats). To be honest, I haven't done extensive solo in any canoe recently, but I figure that a 17' (or more) may be a handful at time, at least more so than a shorter canoe. It can depend on the canoe. I did a lot of solo paddling in the old days and found that a good 17' canoe is easier to handle than a poor 15-16'. If you are talking about a solo canoe (i.e. single seat like the Osprey) then 15-16' is standard. But for a double, even 17 is not too much to handle solo if well designed. It seems very light, although it doesn't seem like it would appreciate being banged into a rock. If Kevlar, it can be quite tough even though light. This canoe has no keel, Keels affect tracking, not stability. Many canoes get their tracking stiffness from the bow and stern shape, so the keel is not critical. The advantage of this design is that they track well but still turn easily. so when I first used it, I thought it felt 'tippy'. After awhile, I got used to it and find the canoe much more stable than the red one, especially when you lean over the side, say, to unhook a fish! I guess that's the Primary/Secondary stability. Correct. Good secondary is more important than high primary. Mike |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Daly wrote:
It can depend on the canoe. I did a lot of solo paddling in the old days and found that a good 17' canoe is easier to handle than a poor 15-16'. If you are talking about a solo canoe (i.e. single seat like the Osprey) then 15-16' is standard. But for a double, even 17 is not too much to handle solo if well designed. OK, so my selections have now expanded to most of the line. Algonquin, Kipawa, Mattawa or maybe a Dumoine. I guess at this point I'm just going to have to head out on Saturday and paddle some of these things. Man I'm rusty... With the asymmetrical canoes, when you paddle them solo, do you still spin the canoe around and sit in the bow seat? Or am I missing the point of a kneeling thwart? Anyways, thanks for all your help. I guess it will probably boil down to $$, from what I've read, it doesn't seem I'll go too far wrong with any of these. Are there good deals at the sales? Here's to hoping I can get into something in Kevlar! Thanks again Brian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Polynesian canoes ( Rat genes solve mystery of great Pacificodyssey | General | |||
Polynesian canoes ( Rat genes solve mystery of great Pacific odyssey | Boat Building | |||
Polynesian canoes ( Rat genes solve mystery of great Pacific odyssey | General | |||
Anyone using Sponsons? | General | |||
Wall Street Journal - Penobscots Make Birchbark Canoes | Boat Building |