On 9/9/2011 7:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

Oh no! Another nothing but blue skies over Obama, dummy.

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:13:16 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

Oh no! Another nothing but blue skies over Obama, dummy.

Ha ha ha. You think any one of those buffoons we witnessed the other
night are going to unseat Obama?

Think again.

On 09/09/2011 7:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:13:16 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

Oh no! Another nothing but blue skies over Obama, dummy.

Ha ha ha. You think any one of those buffoons we witnessed the other
night are going to unseat Obama?

Think again.

At the rate Obomba the economy with debt is going, Bozo might be able to
beat Obama in 2012.
--
First rule of holes: If your in one, don't keep digging.
So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt?

On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:04:25 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/09/2011 7:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:13:16 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

Oh no! Another nothing but blue skies over Obama, dummy.

Ha ha ha. You think any one of those buffoons we witnessed the other
night are going to unseat Obama?

Think again.

At the rate Obomba the economy with debt is going, Bozo might be able to
beat Obama in 2012.

You are not Bozo. You are an idiot.