LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 823
Default Wally-Mart in trouble locally

On 9/13/2011 3:06 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:32:16 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:54:32 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:54:36 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:06:43 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:18:52 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:10:37 -0400,
wrote:


We were not talking about malls, we were talking about bars and
restaurants. If a person wants to have a "smoking allowed" restaurant
on a separate lot, you have no reason to be there if smoke bothers
you.
I bet you don't spend a lot of time in strip joints either, no matter
how good the food is..

So, you're now claiming that there are no restaurants or bars in
malls? Restaurants are by nature public. There's no Fed ban. These are
local and state issued bans. Too bad if you don't like what your state
has done.

The law applies equally to a restaurant in a mall and one out on a
lonely dead end road. Are you saying that if it was away from the mall
it could allow smoking. Otherwise you are trying to change the subject
again.


Take a limiting case... Imagine driving down a highway in the middle
of nowhere. You need to use the toilet and finally you come across the
only restaurant for miles. Unfortunately, it's a smoking establishment
and you're allergic to cig smoke.

So, that's why it applies equally.


What if you were allergic to peanuts and the peanut shells were 2"
deep on the floor.?

huh? No idea what you're asking.


You say the bar has to cater to your smoke aversion, wouldn't they
then have to cater to your peanut allergy if you had one?
Would they have to keep their grass mowed in case you were allergic to
weeds?


So, basically you're saying that a food that harms a very tiny number
of people is somehow the equivalent of a drug that harms just about
everyone who comes in contact with it. Keep at it. You're making
history with false equivalences.


You've come full circle , now, on the peanut thing. Your original claim
was that large number of people had peanut allergies. Now it's a tiny
number. Greg was right. He can lead you anywhere he wants to take you.
Watch out! He'll have you chewing on your own ass
It's really funny to watch you two interact.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trouble for wal-mart OmDeFlume General 9 May 1st 11 02:07 PM
Wal-Mart...a criminal enterprise? H the K (I post with a Mac) General 4 December 7th 09 10:53 PM
Hillary! Loyal Wal-Mart Director? Valguard Toebreakerson General 4 February 1st 08 01:57 AM
Big Box Mart Bob Crantz ASA 0 October 19th 05 06:42 PM
Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!! jchaplain General 328 December 18th 03 06:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017