On 9/6/11 3:38 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/6/11 3:16 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:19:36 -0400, John
wrote:

When compared to any other occupation, union construction workers
demonstrate among the highest
heavy alcohol and illicit drug use.

Damn, I didn't know that. That explains a lot of the problems with
our infrastructure. Maybe we
should give union workers more money.

Why do I doubt you'll be mentioning this next time you run into a
construction worker...

Herring, physically, looks like he could be knocked to the ground by a
passing feather. Remember those photos of thin, brittle-looking HIV
sufferers in the 1980's? Well, our boy Herring looks like one.

We have all seen photos of him and his wife. His wife had a really nice
looking face. Your wife .... well I guess you can say she really knows
how to wear all of those chins.

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:14:32 -0400, Your Name Here
wrote:

We have all seen photos of him and his wife. His wife had a really nice
looking face. Your wife .... well I guess you can say she really knows
how to wear all of those chins.

===============

Hey guys, listen up for a minute.

Do you really think it's appropriate to drag someone's wife or other
family member into the so called discussions here?

The only thing that any of us know for sure about Harry's wife is that
she is married to a loser. That should be burden enough for her.

In all seriousness I'd like to see everyone knock it off. It's just
not the right thing to do.

And yes, I know, I know, I really do, so don't dredge up the past.
It's all out there and we all know where to find it.

Two wrongs does not make a right however, and some of you do know
better.

On Sep 6, 5:40*pm, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:14:32 -0400, Your Name Here

wrote:
We have all seen photos of him and his wife. *His wife had a really nice
looking face. *Your wife .... well I guess you can say she really knows
how to wear all of those chins.

===============

Hey guys, listen up for a minute.

Do you really think it's appropriate to drag someone's wife or other
family member into the so called discussions here?

The only thing that any of us know for sure about Harry's wife is that
she is married to a loser. * That should be burden enough for her.

In all seriousness I'd like to see everyone knock it off. *It's just
not the right thing to do. *

And yes, I know, I know, I really do, so don't dredge up the past.
It's all out there and we all know where to find it. *

Two wrongs does not make a right however, and some of you do know
better.


We've got some truly criminally insane dopers here.

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:40:21 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:14:32 -0400, Your Name Here
wrote:

We have all seen photos of him and his wife. His wife had a really nice
looking face. Your wife .... well I guess you can say she really knows
how to wear all of those chins.

===============

Hey guys, listen up for a minute.

Do you really think it's appropriate to drag someone's wife or other
family member into the so called discussions here?

The only thing that any of us know for sure about Harry's wife is that
she is married to a loser. That should be burden enough for her.

In all seriousness I'd like to see everyone knock it off. It's just
not the right thing to do.

And yes, I know, I know, I really do, so don't dredge up the past.
It's all out there and we all know where to find it.

Two wrongs does not make a right however, and some of you do know
better.



Well, you haven't condemned anyone on the right from calling me all
sorts of vile things, so I guess it is ok with you?

I'm willing to stop calling Knuckles a moron if you think it'll help?

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:40:21 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:14:32 -0400, Your Name Here
wrote:

We have all seen photos of him and his wife. His wife had a really nice
looking face. Your wife .... well I guess you can say she really knows
how to wear all of those chins.

===============

Hey guys, listen up for a minute.

Do you really think it's appropriate to drag someone's wife or other
family member into the so called discussions here?

The only thing that any of us know for sure about Harry's wife is that
she is married to a loser. That should be burden enough for her.

In all seriousness I'd like to see everyone knock it off. It's just
not the right thing to do.

And yes, I know, I know, I really do, so don't dredge up the past.
It's all out there and we all know where to find it.

Two wrongs does not make a right however, and some of you do know
better.



I definitely agree with this post. Family should not be mentioned - by either side. Of course, that
means all the incest and family pedophile comments should go also.

They're sick.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:14:32 -0400, Your Name Here
wrote:

We have all seen photos of him and his wife. His wife had a really nice
looking face. Your wife .... well I guess you can say she really knows
how to wear all of those chins.

===============

Hey guys, listen up for a minute.

Do you really think it's appropriate to drag someone's wife or other
family member into the so called discussions here?

Harry was the first to do this with Scotty's daughters and wife, loogies
daughter and wife. He's deserving.

The only thing that any of us know for sure about Harry's wife is that
she is married to a loser. That should be burden enough for her.

I agree!

On 9/6/2011 4:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:19:36 -0400, John
wrote:

When compared to any other occupation, union construction workers demonstrate among the highest
heavy alcohol and illicit drug use.

Damn, I didn't know that. That explains a lot of the problems with our infrastructure. Maybe we
should give union workers more money.

Might be true, but I suspect it isn't and you are just trolling,
otherwise you would have mentioned a source.

Look at the abstract of the new Doctor's dissertation. Are you calling
her misinformed, or worse, a liar like her husband.

On 9/6/11 5:40 PM, BeachBum wrote:
On 9/6/2011 4:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:19:36 -0400, John
wrote:

When compared to any other occupation, union construction workers
demonstrate among the highest
heavy alcohol and illicit drug use.

Damn, I didn't know that. That explains a lot of the problems with
our infrastructure. Maybe we
should give union workers more money.

Might be true, but I suspect it isn't and you are just trolling,
otherwise you would have mentioned a source.

Look at the abstract of the new Doctor's dissertation. Are you calling
her misinformed, or worse, a liar like her husband.


Sadly, substance abuse is far worse among non-unionized construction
workers, most of whom work on projects where employees are not subject
to random drug tests.

It has been known for many years that a substantial percentage of
construction workers abuse substances. A lot but not all of this is a
result of a need to self-medicate. Construction workers sustain a lot of
back, leg, muscular type injuries during their work years, and these
take a toll. For some workers, self-medication becomes the only avenue
for pain relief. This is not a country where an injured worker gets
adequate compensation for work-related injuries and illnesses, or even
reasonable access to retraining.

The purpose of my wife's research was not to point out that construction
workers abuse substances, but to explore the barriers they encounter to
seeking proper treatment for their abuse problems. It is one hell of a
document, and is being considered for publication in a professional journal.

Now, about your wife's educational and professional accomplishments,
flajim...Are there any?

--
I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the
powerful.

On 9/6/11 5:57 PM, X ` Man wrote:
and is being considered for publication in a professional journal.

Absolutely EVERY article submitted to any journal is considered for
publication. If I submitted this post to any journal it would be
"considered" for publication. It would be **** canned and never would
be published, but it would be considered.

Your wife gets a PhD from a 3rd rate college and you think it is
"special". Does Karen Grear know you were so ashamed of her, that you
had to make up an imaginary career for her to boast your bruised ego?
While you used to pretend she was a Medical Doctor, she was really a
social worker. Now that she has a degree from a 3rd rate college, you
have to pretend that she is an intellectual powerhouse. If your wife
was half as intelligent as you like to pretend, she would have gotten
her PhD from Georgetown. Such shame, but I guess it is better than
getting your undergrad degree from Univ. of Kansas.

What are you going to do now that we all know that your wife is
overweight, has 3 chins, is old and really would not be considered
beautiful (or even cute) by anyone?

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:57:50 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 9/6/11 5:40 PM, BeachBum wrote:
On 9/6/2011 4:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:19:36 -0400, John
wrote:

When compared to any other occupation, union construction workers
demonstrate among the highest
heavy alcohol and illicit drug use.

Damn, I didn't know that. That explains a lot of the problems with
our infrastructure. Maybe we
should give union workers more money.

Might be true, but I suspect it isn't and you are just trolling,
otherwise you would have mentioned a source.

Look at the abstract of the new Doctor's dissertation. Are you calling
her misinformed, or worse, a liar like her husband.


Sadly, substance abuse is far worse among non-unionized construction
workers, most of whom work on projects where employees are not subject
to random drug tests.
Bull****.