On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:22:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 31/08/2011 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 31, 11:48 am, wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...mpany-you-cann...

Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually
work.

Look at this:
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...avis-Bacon.htm
even the govt is finding their own regs are a barrier to green jobs
creation.

Best solution, every department, every law, every stupid government
regulation needs to be review for effectiveness, rationality and bet 80%
of it is bull****. Cut 60% of government. Yep, deforest the dead weight.

Watched a documentary the other night on 9/11 where government is so big
they have turf wars between the departments that indirectly lead to Al
Queda getting the chance to pull off 9/11. Some dumb democrat
ambassador in Yemen booted out a FBI investigator that almost tripped
ont he 9/11 plots. Fighting her own government for her own political
bull****.

Simply put, need a president that fires such idiots routinely.

But it is what happens when government gets too big for the good of the
people. That is why we have a depression. Preserving big fat
government is more important than the people.

Print money for big government debt, to keep government big and
dysfunctional. New debt is inflationary, unemploying people as less
goods are needed. That means less taxes and more debt...more money
print and destroys the US economy with DEBT and FRAUD.

All to keep government big, fat an ineffective.

Unfortunately for you, that's already underway and has been since
2009, depending on the department and the issue.

http://blogs.cgdev.org/mca-monitor/2...ent-policy.php

http://ipolitics.ca/budget2011/2011/...-to-cut-costs/

Of course, you hate Obama, so it doesn't matter.

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:49:43 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:22:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 31/08/2011 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 31, 11:48 am, wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch

wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...mpany-you-cann...

Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually
work.

Look at this:
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...avis-Bacon.htm
even the govt is finding their own regs are a barrier to green jobs
creation.

Best solution, every department, every law, every stupid government
regulation needs to be review for effectiveness, rationality and bet 80%
of it is bull****. Cut 60% of government. Yep, deforest the dead weight.

Watched a documentary the other night on 9/11 where government is so big
they have turf wars between the departments that indirectly lead to Al
Queda getting the chance to pull off 9/11. Some dumb democrat
ambassador in Yemen booted out a FBI investigator that almost tripped
ont he 9/11 plots. Fighting her own government for her own political
bull****.

Simply put, need a president that fires such idiots routinely.

But it is what happens when government gets too big for the good of the
people. That is why we have a depression. Preserving big fat
government is more important than the people.

Print money for big government debt, to keep government big and
dysfunctional. New debt is inflationary, unemploying people as less
goods are needed. That means less taxes and more debt...more money
print and destroys the US economy with DEBT and FRAUD.

All to keep government big, fat an ineffective.

Unfortunately for you, that's already underway and has been since
2009, depending on the department and the issue.

http://blogs.cgdev.org/mca-monitor/2...ent-policy.php

http://ipolitics.ca/budget2011/2011/...-to-cut-costs/

Of course, you hate Obama, so it doesn't matter.

Here's the WSJ article about it... note the second link above is
what's happening in your country, socialist though it may be... LOL

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...252904032.html

On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter

Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a
byzantine **** up.

This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does
no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business
because they couldn't fire the drunk.

But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?

"Canuck57" wrote in message ...

On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter

Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a
byzantine **** up.

This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does
no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business
because they couldn't fire the drunk.

But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?


===========================
reply:
The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a
driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained
about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one
drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving, and
the BAC is much lower for a commercial license.

On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message ...

On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter


Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a
byzantine **** up.

This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does
no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business
because they couldn't fire the drunk.

But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?


===========================
reply:
The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a
driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained
about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one
drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving,
and the BAC is much lower for a commercial license.

Well then the company went above and beyond already.

My guess, some senator or congress people indirectly or directly own his
competition and the idea is to lean on him.

Was looking over net worth history of some politicians the other day.
And notices how many seem to be able to consistently pick names you
never heard of that take off in the markets. Almost as if they get a
regular feed of good inside tips for favors.

--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?

On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:34:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message ...

On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter


Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have
resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals
surprised?

This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a
byzantine **** up.

This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does
no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business
because they couldn't fire the drunk.

But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?


===========================
reply:
The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a
driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained
about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one
drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving,
and the BAC is much lower for a commercial license.

Well then the company went above and beyond already.

My guess, some senator or congress people indirectly or directly own his
competition and the idea is to lean on him.

Was looking over net worth history of some politicians the other day.
And notices how many seem to be able to consistently pick names you
never heard of that take off in the markets. Almost as if they get a
regular feed of good inside tips for favors.

You "guess" a lot, but mostly, you just spout Rush's garbage. You're
100% stupid.