On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:23:37 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 8/15/2011 8:34 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:00:58 -0600,
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHyug2PvpB8


and here's a touching picture of canuck at a family reunion

http://www.life.com/gallery/25151/im...ys-kkk#index/2

Is it true that 99% of KKK members were democrats?

probably. the south was heavily right wing democrat unti johnson
signed the voting rights act. then the GOP discovered it could win
elections by playing the race card


"Eisenhower signed the GOP's 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a
five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats, and in 1964,
Democrat President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act after
former Klansman Robert Byrd's 14-hour filibuster, and the votes of 22
other Senate Democrats, including Tennessee's Al Gore Sr., failed to
scuttle the plan."

Poor naive Bob.

not too smart are you. never heard of the civil rights act of 1964,
did you?

typical right winger...very stupid

On 8/16/2011 5:38 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:23:37 -0400, wrote:

On 8/15/2011 8:34 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:00:58 -0600,
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHyug2PvpB8


and here's a touching picture of canuck at a family reunion

http://www.life.com/gallery/25151/im...ys-kkk#index/2

Is it true that 99% of KKK members were democrats?

probably. the south was heavily right wing democrat unti johnson
signed the voting rights act. then the GOP discovered it could win
elections by playing the race card

Class warfare, which yourself and most democrats foster, is in
practicality the race card. It's in your best interest politically to
pit the poorest citizens against the wealthy to remain in power. The
poor are told they are victims, like yourself, of the 'greedy' wealthy.
What you desire is a redistribution of their wealth, so you can be enriched.

That said,there are those who have become wealthy by treating those who
work for them poorly. Conversely, there is a whole class of persons who
have little or no desire to work, but have learned to take advantage of
the redistribution of wealth.

"Eisenhower signed the GOP's 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a
five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats, and in 1964,
Democrat President Lyndon Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act after
former Klansman Robert Byrd's 14-hour filibuster, and the votes of 22
other Senate Democrats, including Tennessee's Al Gore Sr., failed to
scuttle the plan."

Poor naive Bob.

not too smart are you. never heard of the civil rights act of 1964,
did you?

Wasn't that in the quote above, bob?

typical right winger...very stupid

Yea, ok, bob. Poor naive bob.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:41:35 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 8/16/2011 5:38 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:23:37 -0400, wrote:

On 8/15/2011 8:34 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:00:58 -0600,
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHyug2PvpB8


and here's a touching picture of canuck at a family reunion

http://www.life.com/gallery/25151/im...ys-kkk#index/2

Is it true that 99% of KKK members were democrats?

probably. the south was heavily right wing democrat unti johnson
signed the voting rights act. then the GOP discovered it could win
elections by playing the race card

Class warfare, which yoursealf and most democrats foster,

yeah and i suppose dec 7 1941 was an attack on japan by US forces,
right. you guys WAGE war then complain when someone leaves the dead
cats on your doorstep. you're truly amazing.


is in
practicality the race card. It's in your best interest politically to
pit the poorest citizens against the wealthy to remain in power.

uh huh

the richest 1% have had a 500% pay increase in the last 30 years.

how'd that work out for america? we doing OK? because if YOU are
correct and there NO class warfare in america, we should have a strong
middle class with low unemployment

if there IS class warfare then we should have high unemployment,
stagnant wages, etc

so tell me, right winger

uh....which fits america today?

That said,there are those who have become wealthy by treating those who
work for them poorly. Conversely, there is a whole class of persons who
have little or no desire to work, but have learned to take advantage of
the redistribution of wealth.

gee. in the last 3 years 10 trillion dollars worth of equity has
disappeared

either

1. the middle class got AMAZINGLY and SUDDENLY lazy in the last 3
years OR

2. the accumulated transfer of wealth caused the financial house of
cards in teh US to come tumbling down

so tell me right winger...uh....

which is it?

c'mon back when you have actual evidence and can play with the adults,
OK?

On 8/16/2011 6:55 PM, wf3h wrote:

the richest 1% have had a 500% pay increase in the last 30 years.

Thanks for confirming you advocate class warfare. It's racism.

On 8/16/2011 7:59 PM, wrote:

Well, what do you propose? The greatest majority of money is held in
too few hands and they aren't spending it.

To take from the rich to give to the poor is to foster class warfare.

Understand that in the big picture, those who want power have realized
that, as you say, the rich are in the minority, therefore, they pander
to "poor" because it keeps them in power.

I have to shake my head at the fact that people like bob don't get that
those he voted for and who are in power bailed out his arch enemy, "wall
street", and now WS is making money like before.

Bob is doomed to repeat his experience again and again. Each time, bob
is expecting a different result.

How about trying something other than class warfare and printing money?
Won't work, because of people like bob, who is just a sample of those
who are defined as "poor".

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:49:53 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 8/16/2011 6:55 PM, wf3h wrote:

the richest 1% have had a 500% pay increase in the last 30 years.

Thanks for confirming you advocate class warfare. It's racism.

thanks for advocating class warfare. it's right wing revisionism

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:08:08 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 8/16/2011 7:59 PM, wrote:

Well, what do you propose? The greatest majority of money is held in
too few hands and they aren't spending it.

To take from the rich to give to the poor is to foster class warfare.

to take from the poor to give to the rich is to foster class warfare


Understand that in the big picture, those who want power have realized
that, as you say, the rich are in the minority, therefore, they pander
to "poor" because it keeps them in power.

HAHAHAHA when have the powerful ever pandered to the poor? hell we
have rick perry selling his govt to the highest bidder. we have the
SCOTUS saying companies and foreign countries can buy elections like
penny candy


I have to shake my head at the fact that people like bob don't get that
those he voted for and who are in power bailed out his arch enemy, "wall
street", and now WS is making money like before.

i have to shake my head at the fact people like this right wing moron
never studied history and dont realize that not bailing out the
DEREGULATED banks would have led to a bank panic like 1929

this is one reason the right is SO stupid. they dont study history


Bob is doomed to repeat his experience again and again. Each time, bob
is expecting a different result.

says the guy who wants to repeat 1929

How about trying something other than class warfare and printing money?

you're the one WAGING class warfare

and bernake??

practiced printing HUGE sums of money in 2007 during the GOP
presidency of bush

Won't work, because of people like bob, who is just a sample of those
who are defined as "poor".

and the right hates the middle class, calling us all 'poor' and
telling us how superior the rich are

the US has the richest rich class in the world. if what the right says
was true we should have low unemployment

uh...do we?

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:08:08 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

How about trying something other than class warfare and printing money?
Won't work, because of people like bob, who is just a sample of those
who are defined as "poor".

=====

Bob is not poor although he likes to think of himself that way for
some reason. He has a boat. By definition that means he has
disposable income above and beyond what he needs to live on. The
truly poor do not have disposable income.

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:09:46 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:08:08 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

How about trying something other than class warfare and printing money?
Won't work, because of people like bob, who is just a sample of those
who are defined as "poor".

=====

Bob is not poor although he likes to think of himself that way for
some reason. He has a boat. By definition that means he has
disposable income above and beyond what he needs to live on. The
truly poor do not have disposable income.

i'm middle class. never claimed to be poor although the rich think of
the middle class as a piggy bank

On 8/17/2011 4:08 PM, Jimmy wrote:
On 8/16/2011 7:59 PM, wrote:

Well, what do you propose? The greatest majority of money is held in
too few hands and they aren't spending it.

To take from the rich to give to the poor is to foster class warfare.

Understand that in the big picture, those who want power have realized
that, as you say, the rich are in the minority, therefore, they pander
to "poor" because it keeps them in power.

I have to shake my head at the fact that people like bob don't get that
those he voted for and who are in power bailed out his arch enemy, "wall
street", and now WS is making money like before.

Bob is doomed to repeat his experience again and again. Each time, bob
is expecting a different result.

How about trying something other than class warfare and printing money?
Won't work, because of people like bob, who is just a sample of those
who are defined as "poor".



What ****es me off is the stupid **** is doing nothing, has no plan,
only vacation plans. I saw him on the campaign trail today, and
yesterday for that matter, playing to a very small crowd, no enthuiasm
at all... Half the "supporters" didn't even bother clapping during his
best talking points...

Anyway, the funniest line of the day was listening to the traitor say
"everyone agrees the economy is getting better"!!! What the **** is this
stupid **** talking about? Has he walked into a retail store, or bought
a gallon of gas lately? Idiot, he is deliberately trashing the country,
he is Taliban....