Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2011
Posts: 358
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On 7/24/2011 6:39 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:01:05 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:

What the 'ell are you whining about??
We don't get a mortgage interest deduction on our income taxes for our
principal home.. let alone cottages or boats.
No wonder the USA is in such deep debt.... no one wants to pay their
fair share of taxes.

It's not that simple. Actually I think that most people do want to
pay their fair share but it gets complicated when the rules change in
mid-stream. People make long term financial decisions based on the
tax structure in place at that time, and then they have to live with
that decision expecting the rules to stay the same.


It should be that simple. The tax code is a quagmire that needs to be
simplified, not expanded. Same with legislation.
  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,524
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On 7/24/11 8:37 AM, Florida Jim wrote:
On 7/24/2011 6:39 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:01:05 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:

What the 'ell are you whining about??
We don't get a mortgage interest deduction on our income taxes for our
principal home.. let alone cottages or boats.
No wonder the USA is in such deep debt.... no one wants to pay their
fair share of taxes.

It's not that simple. Actually I think that most people do want to
pay their fair share but it gets complicated when the rules change in
mid-stream. People make long term financial decisions based on the
tax structure in place at that time, and then they have to live with
that decision expecting the rules to stay the same.


It should be that simple. The tax code is a quagmire that needs to be
simplified, not expanded. Same with legislation.


It's a quagmire because the people with money pay lobbyists big bucks to
have exemptions written into the tax code for them. The rich simply do
not want to pay their fair share of taxes.
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2011
Posts: 44
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On 7/24/2011 8:40 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/24/11 8:37 AM, Florida Jim wrote:
On 7/24/2011 6:39 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:01:05 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:

What the 'ell are you whining about??
We don't get a mortgage interest deduction on our income taxes for our
principal home.. let alone cottages or boats.
No wonder the USA is in such deep debt.... no one wants to pay their
fair share of taxes.
It's not that simple. Actually I think that most people do want to
pay their fair share but it gets complicated when the rules change in
mid-stream. People make long term financial decisions based on the
tax structure in place at that time, and then they have to live with
that decision expecting the rules to stay the same.


It should be that simple. The tax code is a quagmire that needs to be
simplified, not expanded. Same with legislation.


It's a quagmire because the people with money pay lobbyists big bucks to
have exemptions written into the tax code for them. The rich simply do
not want to pay their fair share of taxes.



And why do these congress critters, on both sides, yield to the
lobbyists. Oh...they're looking out for our well being. NOT!!
  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2011
Posts: 358
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On 7/24/2011 8:40 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/24/11 8:37 AM, Florida Jim wrote:
On 7/24/2011 6:39 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:01:05 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:

What the 'ell are you whining about??
We don't get a mortgage interest deduction on our income taxes for our
principal home.. let alone cottages or boats.
No wonder the USA is in such deep debt.... no one wants to pay their
fair share of taxes.
It's not that simple. Actually I think that most people do want to
pay their fair share but it gets complicated when the rules change in
mid-stream. People make long term financial decisions based on the
tax structure in place at that time, and then they have to live with
that decision expecting the rules to stay the same.


It should be that simple. The tax code is a quagmire that needs to be
simplified, not expanded. Same with legislation.


It's a quagmire because the people with money pay lobbyists big bucks
to have exemptions written into the tax code for them. The rich simply
do not want to pay their fair share of taxes.


Lobbyists don't write the laws or tax codes. The simply use greed and
fear to intimidate lawmakers into doing their bidding. Now, if we had a
significant number of honest lawmakers, the people with money couldn't
control government. Who's pulling OhBama's strings? Yup. You got it.
Government is corrupt at the very top. So how do we attack the problem?
From the bottom up, or top down?
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On Jul 23, 8:58*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 7/23/11 7:55 PM, LilAbner wrote:

On 7/23/2011 7:45 PM, John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/3r5l8ur


I wonder if the Democrats realize that it doesn't take a 'yacht' to
have a head, stove, and bed.
Hell, I had that in my 21' Proline.


If they want to do away with a second home mortgage interest
deduction, then do it for *all* second
homes.


All boats and all second homes over a certain value...that'll do it.


Why not *any* qualified second home?


  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On Jul 23, 9:35*pm, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:58:14 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

On 7/23/11 7:55 PM, LilAbner wrote:
On 7/23/2011 7:45 PM, John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/3r5l8ur


I wonder if the Democrats realize that it doesn't take a 'yacht' to
have a head, stove, and bed.
Hell, I had that in my 21' Proline.


If they want to do away with a second home mortgage interest
deduction, then do it for *all* second
homes.


All boats and all second homes over a certain value...that'll do it.


What if you travel around in an RV and trailer a boat?

What if you live on your large yacht and have a very big dinghy?

LOL


Please read your post. At what are you laughing?

What if???
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On Jul 23, 9:44*pm, Florida Jim wrote:
On 7/23/2011 9:35 PM, wrote:







On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:58:14 -0400,
wrote:


On 7/23/11 7:55 PM, LilAbner wrote:
On 7/23/2011 7:45 PM, John H wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/3r5l8ur


I wonder if the Democrats realize that it doesn't take a 'yacht' to
have a head, stove, and bed.
Hell, I had that in my 21' Proline.


If they want to do away with a second home mortgage interest
deduction, then do it for *all* second
homes.
All boats and all second homes over a certain value...that'll do it.

What if you travel around in an RV and trailer a boat?


What if you live on your large yacht and have a very big dinghy?


LOL


Eliminate all mortgage interest deductions. That'll do it better.


At least it would be fair across the board. Might not be popular and
might have a somewhat detrimental impact on the housing market. It
would probably help the rental market though.
  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On Jul 23, 11:01*pm, North Star wrote:
On Jul 23, 8:45*pm, John H wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/3r5l8ur


I wonder if the Democrats realize that it doesn't take a 'yacht' to have a head, stove, and bed.
Hell, I had that in my 21' Proline.


If they want to do away with a second home mortgage interest deduction, then do it for *all* second
homes.


Why do they pick only on boat owners?


What the 'ell are you whining about??
We don't get a mortgage interest deduction on our income taxes for our
principal home.. let alone cottages or boats.
No wonder the USA is in such deep debt.... no one wants to pay their
fair share of taxes.


Donnie, how do you define 'fair share'. Remember, we have about 47% of
our population who pay *no* federal income taxes.
  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On Jul 24, 8:40*am, Harryk wrote:
On 7/24/11 8:37 AM, Florida Jim wrote:









On 7/24/2011 6:39 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:01:05 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:


What the 'ell are you whining about??
We don't get a mortgage interest deduction on our income taxes for our
principal home.. let alone cottages or boats.
No wonder the USA is in such deep debt.... no one wants to pay their
fair share of taxes.
It's not that simple. Actually I think that most people do want to
pay their fair share but it gets complicated when the rules change in
mid-stream. People make long term financial decisions based on the
tax structure in place at that time, and then they have to live with
that decision expecting the rules to stay the same.


It should be that simple. The tax code is a quagmire that needs to be
simplified, not expanded. Same with legislation.


It's a quagmire because the people with money pay lobbyists big bucks to
have exemptions written into the tax code for them. The rich simply do
not want to pay their fair share of taxes.


Neither do the 47% who pay *no* income taxes.
  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Let's get them damn rich yacht owners!!

On Jul 24, 1:28*am, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jul 23, 7:45*pm, John H wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/3r5l8ur


I wonder if the Democrats realize that it doesn't take a 'yacht' to have a head, stove, and bed.
Hell, I had that in my 21' Proline.


If they want to do away with a second home mortgage interest deduction, then do it for *all* second
homes.


Why do they pick only on boat owners?


A portable Hassock, a Naptha Cookstove, and some lifejackets to lie on
doesn't qualify for a Head, Stove, and a Bed you imbecile.


My 21'er slept two in the cuddy, and had a portapotty installed. My
dual burner Coleman gas stove definitely qualified as a cooking
facility.

Note: I didn't need to call you any names to get across my point.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NL_Callantsoog=Yacht on fire_2nd yacht in one week! - 1 attachment Jeronimus[_6_] Tall Ship Photos 2 September 3rd 10 11:46 PM
yacht trans lines: yacht transport Yacht Trans Lines Cruising 1 July 5th 09 10:38 PM
Damn - now they know..... Short Wave Sportfishing General 1 January 24th 08 04:38 PM
Yacht Charter Vancouver - Five Star Yacht Charters Todd Zuccolo Cruising 0 April 17th 05 11:58 AM
Maxi 1000 Yacht - opinions from owners please Clive Williams Cruising 0 August 14th 03 10:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017