Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,525
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

On Jun 18, 1:56*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. *In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. *Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. *Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.


I don't think it took a rep or dem house to figure it out. it came
down to the bottom line. Subsidies are going to be cut for the ethanol
plants.

burning corn squeezin's costs more all the way around, and isn't green
like originally thought/planned.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.


I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all
repulicans are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day
fleabaggers don't vote.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 587
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

On 6/18/11 5:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.


I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all repulicans
are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day fleabaggers don't vote.



You fellows don't seem to get anything right. The votes in question were
in the Senate, not the House, and is opposed by most teabagger Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2011
Posts: 1,786
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

On Jun 18, 7:01*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 6/18/11 5:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:





On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.


I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all repulicans
are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day fleabaggers don't vote.


You fellows don't seem to get anything right. The votes in question were
in the Senate, not the House, and is opposed by most teabagger Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



~~ SNERK ~~
These Dopers are a laugh a minute.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,312
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

In article 24fda46d-5cc8-44b6-b9e1-d7a6c5d1b2b9
@i11g2000yqo.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jun 18, 7:01*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 6/18/11 5:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:





On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.


I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all repulicans
are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day fleabaggers don't vote.


You fellows don't seem to get anything right. The votes in question were
in the Senate, not the House, and is opposed by most teabagger Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



~~ SNERK ~~
These Dopers are a laugh a minute.


So you come here insulting again to trash the group, then you are going
to ask folks to go to your "new" group where you promise not to do
that... Sick **** man...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 587
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

On 6/18/11 7:35 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article24fda46d-5cc8-44b6-b9e1-d7a6c5d1b2b9
@i11g2000yqo.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jun 18, 7:01 pm, wrote:
On 6/18/11 5:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:





On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.

I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all repulicans
are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day fleabaggers don't vote.

You fellows don't seem to get anything right. The votes in question were
in the Senate, not the House, and is opposed by most teabagger Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



~~ SNERK ~~
These Dopers are a laugh a minute.


So you come here insulting again to trash the group, then you are going
to ask folks to go to your "new" group where you promise not to do
that... Sick **** man...



You teabaggers are entitled to your opinions, but not to your facts. The
votes were in the Senate, not in the House, and the end to the subsidies
has been opposed by the teabagger Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2011
Posts: 53
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

North Star wrote:
On Jun 18, 7:01 pm, wrote:

On 6/18/11 5:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:






On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.


I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all repulicans
are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day fleabaggers don't vote.

You fellows don't seem to get anything right. The votes in question were
in the Senate, not the House, and is opposed by most teabagger Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


~~ SNERK ~~
These Dopers are a laugh a minute.

And you are nothing but a poor, lazy, lemming, dummy.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2011
Posts: 53
Default Ethanol subsidy and boating

Harryk wrote:
On 6/18/11 7:35 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article24fda46d-5cc8-44b6-b9e1-d7a6c5d1b2b9
@i11g2000yqo.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jun 18, 7:01 pm, wrote:
On 6/18/11 5:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:





On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat
motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even
destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn
is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.

I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all
repulicans
are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day fleabaggers
don't vote.

You fellows don't seem to get anything right. The votes in question
were
in the Senate, not the House, and is opposed by most teabagger
Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


~~ SNERK ~~
These Dopers are a laugh a minute.


So you come here insulting again to trash the group, then you are going
to ask folks to go to your "new" group where you promise not to do
that... Sick **** man...



You teabaggers are entitled to your opinions, but not to your facts.
The votes were in the Senate, not in the House, and the end to the
subsidies has been opposed by the teabagger Republicans.

That has nothing to do wit his response. Try again, narcissist.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto, boating industry groups launch legal assault on EPA ethanol waiver Tim General 0 December 21st 10 02:54 AM
Ethanol; working now Thom Stewart ASA 0 May 12th 06 01:21 AM
Ethanol; working now Thom Stewart ASA 0 May 11th 06 11:04 PM
Ethanol and WTF? RichG General 13 April 7th 06 12:50 AM
Ethanol, etc. RayB General 2 April 5th 06 04:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017