Harryk wrote:
On 6/18/11 7:35 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article24fda46d-5cc8-44b6-b9e1-d7a6c5d1b2b9
@i11g2000yqo.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jun 18, 7:01 pm, wrote:
On 6/18/11 5:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:





On 18/06/2011 12:56 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
The demise of the ethanol subsidy for fuels is the best thing to
happen to boating in the past few years. In many places, it has
become very difficult to get ethanol free fuels to operate boat
motors
and ethanol in boat fuels has caused major problems and even
destroyed
many boat motors. Fuel explosions have even occurred on boats due to
the ethanol dissolving fuel lines.
It has been known for a long time that making ethanol from corn
is an
energy sink, it takes more energy to produce the ethanol than energy
saved. Even worse, it drive up the cost of food and causes vehicles
to be less fuel efficient.
Why did it take a Republican house to finally do what anybody with
more than two neurons could see needed to be done?
CONGRESS FINALLY DID SOMETHING RIGHT.

I guess enough good republicans and a good brain day. Not all
repulicans
are good, some are fleabaggers. But on a good day fleabaggers
don't vote.

You fellows don't seem to get anything right. The votes in question
were
in the Senate, not the House, and is opposed by most teabagger
Republicans.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


~~ SNERK ~~
These Dopers are a laugh a minute.

So you come here insulting again to trash the group, then you are going
to ask folks to go to your "new" group where you promise not to do
that... Sick **** man...



You teabaggers are entitled to your opinions, but not to your facts.
The votes were in the Senate, not in the House, and the end to the
subsidies has been opposed by the teabagger Republicans.

That has nothing to do wit his response. Try again, narcissist.