Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
riverman wrote:
The interesting thing about western ratings is that there is no numerical classification for 'unrunnable'. Ehm, having only run a few rivers west of the Appalachians, I think that you might mistake Grand Canyon ratings for "western rivers" ratings, Myron. The creeks and rivers I saw up close in Colorado were classified I to VI, noting that my paddling buddy is from Colorado... Class 10 often is described as "an inexperienced boatman in a good quality boat has less than a 50-50 chance of making it right-side up." I know a rapid or two that fits this desciption... big grin I like the 10-step breakdown, too, since it clears up some of that vast grey area between Class III and Class IV on the traditional grading scale. Hmmm, that's one of the few level distinctions that I find very clear. IMO a class III paddler will immediately know when they've hit a IV rapid. For a class IV (and over) paddler, a line in a class III rapid will not be anything to note. (and it sounds a lot like Spinal Tap, too.) :-) -- Wilko van den Bergh Eindhoven The Netherlands Europe Look at the possibilities, don't worry about the limitations. http://wilko.webzone.ru/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
newbie questions about Mississippi river boat trip | Cruising | |||
Fox River, north Illinois are users? | General | |||
sponsons really work! (BS) | General | |||
2003 GAULEY RIVER RELEASE INFORMATION | General | |||
Thoughts on volume (CFS) and river levels and such (sort of rambling) | General |