Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... I do not think this president is anywhere as accomplished a liar as the previous president, so he would not be able to keep up the facade. Bill He isn't. He hasn't. "Tell them dumb squats in all the broken down trailer parks out there that SH's has got nukes! That will get the public beatin' the war drums!" Bill, you don't feel just a bit raped when you're so obviously used? There were about three-dozen drafts of the SOTU speech reviewed before GWB was allowed to open his mouth. The same administration had *deleted* references to a nuke program in Iraq in previous speeches specifically because they knew the intelligence was faulty You know this for a fact? Please cite your sources. and the Brits had already denounced the document as a forgery! The Brits NEVER backed away from their Sadamm/Niger/Uranium intelligence. Blair has stated that the forged document is not the basis of the intel and insists the intel they do have is solid. Tell us now, with three dozen proof readings and revisions, that the "Iraq is developing nukes" manipulative pitch was left in as an oversight. Again, please cite your sources. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Article: Bikinis, Beer, Bodies (Welcome to the Delta!) | General |