In article ,
says...

On 6/2/11 7:12 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jun 2, 7:28 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...







On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:00:28 -0400, wrote:

snippage

either way, you are both equally at fault for allowing this stupidity
to continue....

I'm really happy to see the word 'equally'. I'm guessing you meant equally with Harry? So he *is*
part of the problem?

Haven't I been saying that for years? Or really, not just Harry... it
is his "side" vs. your "side."

Two sandboxes full of kids lobbing sand at each other, neither will
quit, and both swear that the other sandbox is at fault.....

You ignored this one:

My idol.... indeed... I don't think I suggested that everybody cares,
but most people won't be as acerbic as we have here, when they are
posting with their own name.... especially those with a new handle
every day. Are you making excuses for them? Are they YOUR idols?

No, and you'll find that I've tried to get them to stop, several times. How often have you tried to
get Harry or Donnie (North Star??) to knock off their incessant ****?

I don't converse with Scotty or Loogy any more. Both of them display the maturity of a two-year
old.
******************

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Gene, you are just far too subtle for me.

I think Gene follows the old adage of praise in public and criticize in
private. He has to we have never seen him criticize Harry in public.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Y'all girliemen sure are concerned with Gene.....
What's the matter..does it fustrate you that he steers his own course
and doesn't toe the doper line?


The boys remind me of the Borg Collective from Star Trek...mindless
automatons who are told what to say and think by Fox News and engineered
to act and think collectively. They simply cannot tolerate those who do
not buy into their simple-minded mindset. There isn't an intellectual
among them.

Why don't you post this **** to your group, Harry. No one wants you
here.

On 6/3/2011 9:02 AM, I Boat wrote:
In ,
says...

On 6/2/11 7:12 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jun 2, 7:28 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...







On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:00:28 -0400, wrote:

snippage

either way, you are both equally at fault for allowing this stupidity
to continue....

I'm really happy to see the word 'equally'. I'm guessing you meant equally with Harry? So he *is*
part of the problem?

Haven't I been saying that for years? Or really, not just Harry... it
is his "side" vs. your "side."

Two sandboxes full of kids lobbing sand at each other, neither will
quit, and both swear that the other sandbox is at fault.....

You ignored this one:

My idol.... indeed... I don't think I suggested that everybody cares,
but most people won't be as acerbic as we have here, when they are
posting with their own name.... especially those with a new handle
every day. Are you making excuses for them? Are they YOUR idols?

No, and you'll find that I've tried to get them to stop, several times. How often have you tried to
get Harry or Donnie (North Star??) to knock off their incessant ****?

I don't converse with Scotty or Loogy any more. Both of them display the maturity of a two-year
old.
******************

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Gene, you are just far too subtle for me.

I think Gene follows the old adage of praise in public and criticize in
private. He has to we have never seen him criticize Harry in public.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Y'all girliemen sure are concerned with Gene.....
What's the matter..does it fustrate you that he steers his own course
and doesn't toe the doper line?


The boys remind me of the Borg Collective from Star Trek...mindless
automatons who are told what to say and think by Fox News and engineered
to act and think collectively. They simply cannot tolerate those who do
not buy into their simple-minded mindset. There isn't an intellectual
among them.

Why don't you post this **** to your group, Harry. No one wants you
here.

Are you sure? Let's put it to a vote.

Who thinks Harry Krause adds value for his boating contributions to
rec.boats?

Jay wrote:
On 6/3/2011 9:02 AM, I Boat wrote:
In ,
says...

On 6/2/11 7:12 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jun 2, 7:28 pm, wrote:
In ,
says...







On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:00:28 -0400,
wrote:

snippage

either way, you are both equally at fault for allowing this
stupidity
to continue....

I'm really happy to see the word 'equally'. I'm guessing you
meant equally with Harry? So he *is*
part of the problem?

Haven't I been saying that for years? Or really, not just
Harry... it
is his "side" vs. your "side."

Two sandboxes full of kids lobbing sand at each other, neither
will
quit, and both swear that the other sandbox is at fault.....

You ignored this one:

My idol.... indeed... I don't think I suggested that
everybody cares,
but most people won't be as acerbic as we have here, when they
are
posting with their own name.... especially those with a new
handle
every day. Are you making excuses for them? Are they YOUR idols?

No, and you'll find that I've tried to get them to stop,
several times. How often have you tried to
get Harry or Donnie (North Star??) to knock off their incessant
****?

I don't converse with Scotty or Loogy any more. Both of them
display the maturity of a two-year
old.
******************

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic
postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Gene, you are just far too subtle for me.

I think Gene follows the old adage of praise in public and
criticize in
private. He has to we have never seen him criticize Harry in
public.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Y'all girliemen sure are concerned with Gene.....
What's the matter..does it fustrate you that he steers his own course
and doesn't toe the doper line?


The boys remind me of the Borg Collective from Star Trek...mindless
automatons who are told what to say and think by Fox News and
engineered
to act and think collectively. They simply cannot tolerate those who do
not buy into their simple-minded mindset. There isn't an intellectual
among them.

Why don't you post this **** to your group, Harry. No one wants you
here.

Are you sure? Let's put it to a vote.

Who thinks Harry Krause adds value for his boating contributions to
rec.boats?
Just Harry.

On 6/3/2011 2:39 PM, Gene wrote:
OK... I'm done.... I won't chide you in the direction of a
solution.... apparently, nobody is really interested, anyway. Have at
it...

Sometime you just have to let pigs wallow in their ****.

On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:39:31 -0400, Gene wrote:

On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 07:20:50 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:49:06 -0400, Gene wrote:

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:28:54 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:00:28 -0400, Gene wrote:


snippage

either way, you are both equally at fault for allowing this stupidity
to continue....

I'm really happy to see the word 'equally'. I'm guessing you meant equally with Harry? So he *is*
part of the problem?

Haven't I been saying that for years? Or really, not just Harry... it
is his "side" vs. your "side."

Two sandboxes full of kids lobbing sand at each other, neither will
quit, and both swear that the other sandbox is at fault.....

You ignored this one:

My idol.... indeed... I don't think I suggested that everybody cares,
but most people won't be as acerbic as we have here, when they are
posting with their own name.... especially those with a new handle
every day. Are you making excuses for them? Are they YOUR idols?

No, and you'll find that I've tried to get them to stop, several times. How often have you tried to
get Harry or Donnie (North Star??) to knock off their incessant ****?

I don't converse with Scotty or Loogy any more. Both of them display the maturity of a two-year
old.
******************

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Gene, you are just far too subtle for me.

I think Gene follows the old adage of praise in public and criticize in
private. He has to we have never seen him criticize Harry in public.

OK, genius.... how do I "attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings?"
How's it working for y'all...?

Follow him mindlessly.

It's not working too well for us either. But, at least we hit both sides. You sure as hell don't.
(Although your 'private' stuff may come down hard on the boys.)

But, at least we hit both sides.
That is TOTAL BS.... Cite? In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group".

You sure as hell don't.
No, I don't....anymore. Trying to get Harry to stop has a lot in
common with the water and duck's back thing. However, I had hoped
you'd be smart enough to get it and help fix the problem. It appears
that I was wrong. It appears all you want to do is accuse me of some
nebulous something that aligns me with the pinko-commie-liberal regime
that somehow has me agreeing with all of Harry's posts. Keep telling
the lie....

OK... I'm done.... I won't chide you in the direction of a
solution.... apparently, nobody is really interested, anyway. Have at
it...

Whoa! You opened a new door. Please explain the solution you won't 'chide' me in the direction of.

This makes no sense to me:

"In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group". "

If you're including Scotty and Kevin in my 'group', then you're sadly mistaken. Both have told me to
**** off repeatedly - because of my attempts to stop their ****. I don't have a 'group', although
you, Harry, and Donnie seem to think so.

On 6/4/2011 8:31 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:39:31 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 07:20:50 -0400, John
wrote:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:49:06 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:28:54 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:00:28 -0400, wrote:


snippage

either way, you are both equally at fault for allowing this stupidity
to continue....

I'm really happy to see the word 'equally'. I'm guessing you meant equally with Harry? So he *is*
part of the problem?

Haven't I been saying that for years? Or really, not just Harry... it
is his "side" vs. your "side."

Two sandboxes full of kids lobbing sand at each other, neither will
quit, and both swear that the other sandbox is at fault.....

You ignored this one:

My idol.... indeed... I don't think I suggested that everybody cares,
but most people won't be as acerbic as we have here, when they are
posting with their own name.... especially those with a new handle
every day. Are you making excuses for them? Are they YOUR idols?

No, and you'll find that I've tried to get them to stop, several times. How often have you tried to
get Harry or Donnie (North Star??) to knock off their incessant ****?

I don't converse with Scotty or Loogy any more. Both of them display the maturity of a two-year
old.
******************

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Gene, you are just far too subtle for me.

I think Gene follows the old adage of praise in public and criticize in
private. He has to we have never seen him criticize Harry in public.

OK, genius.... how do I "attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings?"
How's it working for y'all...?

Follow him mindlessly.

It's not working too well for us either. But, at least we hit both sides. You sure as hell don't.
(Although your 'private' stuff may come down hard on the boys.)

But, at least we hit both sides.
That is TOTAL BS.... Cite? In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group".

You sure as hell don't.
No, I don't....anymore. Trying to get Harry to stop has a lot in
common with the water and duck's back thing. However, I had hoped
you'd be smart enough to get it and help fix the problem. It appears
that I was wrong. It appears all you want to do is accuse me of some
nebulous something that aligns me with the pinko-commie-liberal regime
that somehow has me agreeing with all of Harry's posts. Keep telling
the lie....

OK... I'm done.... I won't chide you in the direction of a
solution.... apparently, nobody is really interested, anyway. Have at
it...

Whoa! You opened a new door. Please explain the solution you won't 'chide' me in the direction of.

This makes no sense to me:

"In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group"."

If you're including Scotty and Kevin in my 'group', then you're sadly mistaken. Both have told me to
**** off repeatedly - because of my attempts to stop their ****. I don't have a 'group', although
you, Harry, and Donnie seem to think so.

If you don't fit the role they imagine for you, they will reinvent you
to suit their purposes. Fleabaggers do that all the time. Kind of like
stepford wives. Their lives must be really boring.

On Jun 4, 9:31*am, John H wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:39:31 -0400, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 07:20:50 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:49:06 -0400, Gene wrote:

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:28:54 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:00:28 -0400, Gene wrote:

snippage

either way, you are both equally at fault for allowing this stupidity
to continue....

I'm really happy to see the word 'equally'. I'm guessing you meant equally with Harry? So he *is*
part of the problem?

Haven't I been saying that for years? Or really, not just Harry.... it
is his "side" vs. your "side."

Two sandboxes full of kids lobbing sand at each other, neither will
quit, and both swear that the other sandbox is at fault.....

You ignored this one:

My idol.... indeed... *I don't think I suggested that everybody cares,
but most people won't be as acerbic as we have here, when they are
posting with their own name.... * especially those with a new handle
every day. Are you making excuses for them? Are they YOUR idols?

No, and you'll find that I've tried to get them to stop, several times. How often have you tried to
get Harry or Donnie (North Star??) to knock off their incessant ****?

I don't converse with Scotty or Loogy any more. Both of them display *the maturity of a two-year
old.
******************

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Gene, you are just far too subtle for me.

I think Gene follows the old adage of praise in public and criticize in
private. He has to we have never seen him criticize Harry in public.

OK, genius.... how do I "attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings?"
How's it working for y'all...?

Follow him mindlessly.

It's not working too well for us either. But, at least we hit both sides. You sure as hell don't.
(Although your 'private' stuff may come down hard on the boys.)

But, at least we hit both sides.
That is TOTAL BS.... Cite? In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group".

You sure as hell don't.
No, I don't....anymore. Trying to get Harry to stop has a lot in
common with the water and duck's back thing. However, I had hoped
you'd be smart enough to get it and help fix the problem. It appears
that I was wrong. It appears all you want to do is accuse me of some
nebulous something that aligns me with the pinko-commie-liberal regime
that somehow has me agreeing with all of Harry's posts. Keep telling
the lie....

OK... I'm done.... I won't chide you in the direction of a
solution.... apparently, nobody is really interested, anyway. Have at
it...

Whoa! You opened a new door. Please explain the solution you won't 'chide' me in the direction of.

This makes no sense to me:

"In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group". "

If you're including Scotty and Kevin in my 'group', then you're sadly mistaken. Both have told me to
**** off repeatedly - because of my attempts to stop their ****. I don't have a 'group', although
you, Harry, and Donnie seem to think so.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go... mentioning me again.
Since you and 'your dopers' have no interest in boats, you'd have
nothing to talk about but brownie recipies, golf dates and
MotoGuzzlers if Harry & I weren't around.

In article 20c62d19-411c-499b-ba03-d65d72b66993
@c41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jun 4, 9:31*am, John H wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:39:31 -0400, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 07:20:50 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:49:06 -0400, Gene wrote:

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:28:54 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:00:28 -0400, Gene wrote:

snippage

either way, you are both equally at fault for allowing this stupidity
to continue....

I'm really happy to see the word 'equally'. I'm guessing you meant equally with Harry? So he *is*
part of the problem?

Haven't I been saying that for years? Or really, not just Harry... it
is his "side" vs. your "side."

Two sandboxes full of kids lobbing sand at each other, neither will
quit, and both swear that the other sandbox is at fault.....

You ignored this one:

My idol.... indeed... *I don't think I suggested that everybody cares,
but most people won't be as acerbic as we have here, when they are
posting with their own name.... * especially those with a new handle
every day. Are you making excuses for them? Are they YOUR idols?

No, and you'll find that I've tried to get them to stop, several times. How often have you tried to
get Harry or Donnie (North Star??) to knock off their incessant ****?

I don't converse with Scotty or Loogy any more. Both of them display *the maturity of a two-year
old.
******************

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Gene, you are just far too subtle for me.

I think Gene follows the old adage of praise in public and criticize in
private. He has to we have never seen him criticize Harry in public.

OK, genius.... how do I "attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings?"
How's it working for y'all...?

Follow him mindlessly.

It's not working too well for us either. But, at least we hit both sides. You sure as hell don't.
(Although your 'private' stuff may come down hard on the boys.)

But, at least we hit both sides.
That is TOTAL BS.... Cite? In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group".

You sure as hell don't.
No, I don't....anymore. Trying to get Harry to stop has a lot in
common with the water and duck's back thing. However, I had hoped
you'd be smart enough to get it and help fix the problem. It appears
that I was wrong. It appears all you want to do is accuse me of some
nebulous something that aligns me with the pinko-commie-liberal regime
that somehow has me agreeing with all of Harry's posts. Keep telling
the lie....

OK... I'm done.... I won't chide you in the direction of a
solution.... apparently, nobody is really interested, anyway. Have at
it...

Whoa! You opened a new door. Please explain the solution you won't 'chide' me in the direction of.

This makes no sense to me:

"In fact, why don't you post the percentage
of my responses to, say, the last 1,000 posts from Harry, vs your
"group". "

If you're including Scotty and Kevin in my 'group', then you're sadly mistaken. Both have told me to
**** off repeatedly - because of my attempts to stop their ****. I don't have a 'group', although
you, Harry, and Donnie seem to think so.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go... mentioning me again.
Since you and 'your dopers' have no interest in boats, you'd have
nothing to talk about but brownie recipies, golf dates and
MotoGuzzlers if Harry & I weren't around.

Here's an idea, dumb ass. leave and let's just see about that.

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:08:34 -0400, John H
wrote:

I've still not seen you attempt to squelch Harry's acerbic postings? Why?

Because you have chosen not to see it, I guess.....

Give it up, Gene.
This group is full of petulant sissies.
Herring is just another of them.
No different than Krause, just doesn't post as much.
The adults have left the stage.

Gene has blinders on, always has and will never take them off.