On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:59:10 -0400, Percy wrote:

On Sat, 14 May 2011 03:59:01 -0400, wf3h sent the
following message
On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:59:44 -0400, wrote:




after the US right has had 30 years of fundamentalist deregulaory
plutocracy, they havent left obama much choice. this is america when
the right wing wins.

you are bat**** crazy bob but you already know that

and that's about the level of response one gets when one challenges
the urban myths of the right

On 14/05/2011 10:32 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:59:10 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 14 May 2011 03:59:01 -0400, sent the
following message
On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:59:44 -0400, wrote:




after the US right has had 30 years of fundamentalist deregulaory
plutocracy, they havent left obama much choice. this is america when
the right wing wins.

you are bat**** crazy bob but you already know that

and that's about the level of response one gets when one challenges
the urban myths of the right

For fleabagger fear?
--
Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we
allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance?

On Sat, 14 May 2011 12:32:17 -0400, wf3h sent the
following message
On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:59:10 -0400, Percy
wrote:


On Sat, 14 May 2011 03:59:01 -0400, wf3h sent
the
following message
On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:59:44 -0400, wrote:




after the US right has had 30 years of fundamentalist deregulaory
plutocracy, they havent left obama much choice. this is america
when
the right wing wins.

you are bat**** crazy bob but you already know that


and that's about the level of response one gets when one challenges
the urban myths of the right

Urban myths of the right? Are you nuts? You make as much sense as
your fruitcake buddy Plume.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:59:10 -0400, Percy wrote:

On Sat, 14 May 2011 03:59:01 -0400, wf3h sent the
following message
On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:59:44 -0400, wrote:




after the US right has had 30 years of fundamentalist deregulaory
plutocracy, they havent left obama much choice. this is america when
the right wing wins.

you are bat**** crazy bob but you already know that

and that's about the level of response one gets when one challenges
the urban myths of the right

You call the tin hat, hyperbole you spew here a "response".. You are
bat**** crazy...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On 13/05/2011 10:29 AM, Harryk wrote:
Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

Hey, we tried it the liberal debt and spend way. All to show for it is
a whole lot of ongoing forclosures, and more than $4 trillion in more
DEBT (so far as more is coming).

I would say ABO, Anyone But Obama.

Or should we use ABBO, Anybody But Barack Obama?

--
Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we
allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance?

On Fri, 13 May 2011 23:06:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/05/2011 10:29 AM, Harryk wrote:
Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

Hey, we tried it the liberal debt and spend way.

were reagan and bush liberals? they were the biggest spenders in US
history

except canuks' too right wing to know histotry


All to show for it is
a whole lot of ongoing forclosures, and more than $4 trillion in more
DEBT (so far as more is coming).

I would say ABO, Anyone But Obama.

he'd really say ABABP...anyone but a black person


Or should we use ABBO, Anybody But Barack Obama?

On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:01:03 -0400, wf3h sent the
following message
he'd really say ABABP...anyone but a black person

No. That's what you say. The fact that he is black seems to be your
only counter to critisism of him. You and plume are the only ones
playing that card anymore. Even Krause seems to have smartened up
and moved away from that dumb defensive tactic.

On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:48:34 -0400, Percy wrote:

On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:01:03 -0400, wf3h sent the
following message
he'd really say ABABP...anyone but a black person

No. That's what you say. The fact that he is black seems to be your
only counter to critisism of him. You and plume are the only ones
playing that card anymore. Even Krause seems to have smartened up
and moved away from that dumb defensive tactic.

of course it is. because it's true. given that bush wrecked this
economy, killed 4400 US troops and turned our economy over to wall
street, the efforts on the right to blame this all on the black guy
has an obvious motive

you, of course, have no rebuttal at all

On Sat, 14 May 2011 12:33:17 -0400, wf3h sent the
following message
On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:48:34 -0400, Percy
wrote:


On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:01:03 -0400, wf3h sent
the
following message
he'd really say ABABP...anyone but a black person

No. That's what you say. The fact that he is black seems to be
your
only counter to critisism of him. You and plume are the only ones
playing that card anymore. Even Krause seems to have smartened up
and moved away from that dumb defensive tactic.


of course it is. because it's true. given that bush wrecked this
economy, killed 4400 US troops and turned our economy over to wall
street, the efforts on the right to blame this all on the black guy
has an obvious motive


you, of course, have no rebuttal at all

Show a litte respect bob. His name isn't "the black guy". It's
obsama..

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:48:34 -0400, Percy wrote:

On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:01:03 -0400, wf3h sent the
following message
he'd really say ABABP...anyone but a black person

No. That's what you say. The fact that he is black seems to be your
only counter to critisism of him. You and plume are the only ones
playing that card anymore. Even Krause seems to have smartened up
and moved away from that dumb defensive tactic.

of course it is. because it's true. given that bush wrecked this
economy, killed 4400 US troops and turned our economy over to wall
street, the efforts on the right to blame this all on the black guy
has an obvious motive

you, of course, have no rebuttal at all

Yeah, Bush (sic) shot 4400 people. When you begin a response with total
nonsense, nobody is going to take anything you say seriously. The only
President who has gone out and assinated anybody is President Obama. The
biggest difference between President Bush and President Obama is PB went
after Islamic terrorists, PO is setting up Israel for another
holocaust... The 4400 you keep talking about will be a drop in the
bucket.

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!