On 19/03/2011 10:26 AM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.


I am too small for them to worry about. I don't disagree, Qaddafi (one
of many spellings) is a bad dude and should have been incarerated some 3
or 4 decades ago.

But you stupid sheep haven't asked why our governments dealt so well
with him for so long and all of a sudden govenment says he is evil?
What you might want to ask is who has Qaddafi ****ed off so much that
warrents outsiders interfering in a civil conflict of armed
disobendience. Know these rebel are a MINORITY. That is why the UN is
hesitant to get in on the ground, they could get a bullet in the back
like Somalia.

Yet Obama does not care about the MAJORITY being shot at in Bahrain.
Hypocracy on democracy? The word democracy has been over used in this
conflict as a media ploy -- this whole mess over there is not about
democracy, it is about politicial wars going on.

Might I suggest that you Obama is answering to a differet drummer?

No reason for the US to interfere in Ivory Coast, Guana, Libya or some
other UN-French mess.