BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   It's snerk time in Florida...again. (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/125943-its-snerk-time-florida-again.html)

Harryk March 12th 11 02:46 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
On 3/12/11 8:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlePb6dnRNPX9fBCOfQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I'm sorry, but you haven't offered an explanation of how those
"billions" allegedly got into the pockets of the unions and politicians.
Certainly not from dues payments from union members. Are you insinuating
there were payoffs? Got evidence that these alleged payoffs, if any,
amounted to billions?

If union dues were $100 a man/woman a month, 1000 workers would pay $1.2
million a year in dues. 10,000 workers would pay $12 million a year. 10
years of that would be $120 million.

And those dues dollars are accounted for, to the penny.

Next?


Look beyond the dues Harry. Graft and corruption are not limited to
union dues.

Got proof "billions" of bucks in graft and corruption payoffs got into
the hands of union officials?

I didn't think so. Just more of Snotty's horse****.

Harryk March 12th 11 03:00 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
On 3/12/11 9:53 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articlebtKdnYR1RM2yGubQnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 8:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlePb6dnRNPX9fBCOfQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I'm sorry, but you haven't offered an explanation of how those
"billions" allegedly got into the pockets of the unions and politicians.
Certainly not from dues payments from union members. Are you insinuating
there were payoffs? Got evidence that these alleged payoffs, if any,
amounted to billions?

If union dues were $100 a man/woman a month, 1000 workers would pay $1.2
million a year in dues. 10,000 workers would pay $12 million a year. 10
years of that would be $120 million.

And those dues dollars are accounted for, to the penny.

Next?

Look beyond the dues Harry. Graft and corruption are not limited to
union dues.

Got proof "billions" of bucks in graft and corruption payoffs got into
the hands of union officials?

I didn't think so. Just more of Snotty's horse****.


Awwww, did I say Billions instead of Millions? Poor fat lying little
pedophile, I guess I was looking ahead to Obamas high speed rail buyoff
plans...


You cannot show any proof there was "millions" in corrupt payoffs to
unions in the big dig. Most of the corruption I read about involved
corporations. This claim of yours is just your usual non-fact-based
bull****, little turd man.

I_am_Tosk March 12th 11 03:05 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 9:53 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articlebtKdnYR1RM2yGubQnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 8:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlePb6dnRNPX9fBCOfQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I'm sorry, but you haven't offered an explanation of how those
"billions" allegedly got into the pockets of the unions and politicians.
Certainly not from dues payments from union members. Are you insinuating
there were payoffs? Got evidence that these alleged payoffs, if any,
amounted to billions?

If union dues were $100 a man/woman a month, 1000 workers would pay $1.2
million a year in dues. 10,000 workers would pay $12 million a year. 10
years of that would be $120 million.

And those dues dollars are accounted for, to the penny.

Next?

Look beyond the dues Harry. Graft and corruption are not limited to
union dues.

Got proof "billions" of bucks in graft and corruption payoffs got into
the hands of union officials?

I didn't think so. Just more of Snotty's horse****.


Awwww, did I say Billions instead of Millions? Poor fat lying little
pedophile, I guess I was looking ahead to Obamas high speed rail buyoff
plans...


You cannot show any proof there was "millions" in corrupt payoffs to
unions in the big dig. Most of the corruption I read about involved
corporations. This claim of yours is just your usual non-fact-based
bull****, little turd man.


Do your homework asshole.. I am not going to argue Unions with you,
that's like buying politicians and then going to them for collective
bargaining. You are living off the sweat of others who worked all their
lives, then you steal their retirement too.. Loser...creeper.. go away..

Harryk March 12th 11 03:13 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
On 3/12/11 10:05 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 9:53 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articlebtKdnYR1RM2yGubQnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 8:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlePb6dnRNPX9fBCOfQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I'm sorry, but you haven't offered an explanation of how those
"billions" allegedly got into the pockets of the unions and politicians.
Certainly not from dues payments from union members. Are you insinuating
there were payoffs? Got evidence that these alleged payoffs, if any,
amounted to billions?

If union dues were $100 a man/woman a month, 1000 workers would pay $1.2
million a year in dues. 10,000 workers would pay $12 million a year. 10
years of that would be $120 million.

And those dues dollars are accounted for, to the penny.

Next?

Look beyond the dues Harry. Graft and corruption are not limited to
union dues.

Got proof "billions" of bucks in graft and corruption payoffs got into
the hands of union officials?

I didn't think so. Just more of Snotty's horse****.

Awwww, did I say Billions instead of Millions? Poor fat lying little
pedophile, I guess I was looking ahead to Obamas high speed rail buyoff
plans...


You cannot show any proof there was "millions" in corrupt payoffs to
unions in the big dig. Most of the corruption I read about involved
corporations. This claim of yours is just your usual non-fact-based
bull****, little turd man.


Do your homework asshole.. I am not going to argue Unions with you,
that's like buying politicians and then going to them for collective
bargaining. You are living off the sweat of others who worked all their
lives, then you steal their retirement too.. Loser...creeper.. go away..



As I've stated, you're just tossing more of your bull**** in here. You
have no proof that billions or millions of dollars in payoffs went to
unions whose members worked the big dig. Your pattern is to make up
outrageous crap about people or organizations you don't like, repeat it,
and hope it gets to be believed.

You are an insignificant turd, Ingersoll. You should have been forced to
get a vasectomy as soon as you reached puberty.

I_am_Tosk March 12th 11 03:20 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 10:05 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 9:53 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articlebtKdnYR1RM2yGubQnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 8:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlePb6dnRNPX9fBCOfQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I'm sorry, but you haven't offered an explanation of how those
"billions" allegedly got into the pockets of the unions and politicians.
Certainly not from dues payments from union members. Are you insinuating
there were payoffs? Got evidence that these alleged payoffs, if any,
amounted to billions?

If union dues were $100 a man/woman a month, 1000 workers would pay $1.2
million a year in dues. 10,000 workers would pay $12 million a year. 10
years of that would be $120 million.

And those dues dollars are accounted for, to the penny.

Next?

Look beyond the dues Harry. Graft and corruption are not limited to
union dues.

Got proof "billions" of bucks in graft and corruption payoffs got into
the hands of union officials?

I didn't think so. Just more of Snotty's horse****.

Awwww, did I say Billions instead of Millions? Poor fat lying little
pedophile, I guess I was looking ahead to Obamas high speed rail buyoff
plans...

You cannot show any proof there was "millions" in corrupt payoffs to
unions in the big dig. Most of the corruption I read about involved
corporations. This claim of yours is just your usual non-fact-based
bull****, little turd man.


Do your homework asshole.. I am not going to argue Unions with you,
that's like buying politicians and then going to them for collective
bargaining. You are living off the sweat of others who worked all their
lives, then you steal their retirement too.. Loser...creeper.. go away..



As I've stated, you're just tossing more of your bull**** in here. You
have no proof that billions or millions of dollars in payoffs went to
unions whose members worked the big dig. Your pattern is to make up
outrageous crap about people or organizations you don't like, repeat it,
and hope it gets to be believed.

You are an insignificant turd, Ingersoll. You should have been forced to
get a vasectomy as soon as you reached puberty.


You are useless, plonk Leave me out of your creeper fantasy..

Harryk March 12th 11 03:24 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
On 3/12/11 10:20 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articleV9OdncgXH6slEObQnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 10:05 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 9:53 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articlebtKdnYR1RM2yGubQnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 8:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlePb6dnRNPX9fBCOfQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I'm sorry, but you haven't offered an explanation of how those
"billions" allegedly got into the pockets of the unions and politicians.
Certainly not from dues payments from union members. Are you insinuating
there were payoffs? Got evidence that these alleged payoffs, if any,
amounted to billions?

If union dues were $100 a man/woman a month, 1000 workers would pay $1.2
million a year in dues. 10,000 workers would pay $12 million a year. 10
years of that would be $120 million.

And those dues dollars are accounted for, to the penny.

Next?

Look beyond the dues Harry. Graft and corruption are not limited to
union dues.

Got proof "billions" of bucks in graft and corruption payoffs got into
the hands of union officials?

I didn't think so. Just more of Snotty's horse****.

Awwww, did I say Billions instead of Millions? Poor fat lying little
pedophile, I guess I was looking ahead to Obamas high speed rail buyoff
plans...

You cannot show any proof there was "millions" in corrupt payoffs to
unions in the big dig. Most of the corruption I read about involved
corporations. This claim of yours is just your usual non-fact-based
bull****, little turd man.

Do your homework asshole.. I am not going to argue Unions with you,
that's like buying politicians and then going to them for collective
bargaining. You are living off the sweat of others who worked all their
lives, then you steal their retirement too.. Loser...creeper.. go away..



As I've stated, you're just tossing more of your bull**** in here. You
have no proof that billions or millions of dollars in payoffs went to
unions whose members worked the big dig. Your pattern is to make up
outrageous crap about people or organizations you don't like, repeat it,
and hope it gets to be believed.

You are an insignificant turd, Ingersoll. You should have been forced to
get a vasectomy as soon as you reached puberty.


You are useless,plonk Leave me out of your creeper fantasy..


Not to worry, Snotty. I'm going to continue to call you out on every
political post of yours that is eyebrow deep in your made-up bull****.

HenryK[_2_] March 12th 11 03:26 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
On 3/12/2011 10:24 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 3/12/11 10:20 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articleV9OdncgXH6slEObQnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 10:05 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 9:53 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articlebtKdnYR1RM2yGubQnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 8:55 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlePb6dnRNPX9fBCOfQnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@earthlink .com,
payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

I'm sorry, but you haven't offered an explanation of how those
"billions" allegedly got into the pockets of the unions and
politicians.
Certainly not from dues payments from union members. Are you
insinuating
there were payoffs? Got evidence that these alleged payoffs, if
any,
amounted to billions?

If union dues were $100 a man/woman a month, 1000 workers would
pay $1.2
million a year in dues. 10,000 workers would pay $12 million a
year. 10
years of that would be $120 million.

And those dues dollars are accounted for, to the penny.

Next?

Look beyond the dues Harry. Graft and corruption are not limited to
union dues.

Got proof "billions" of bucks in graft and corruption payoffs got
into
the hands of union officials?

I didn't think so. Just more of Snotty's horse****.

Awwww, did I say Billions instead of Millions? Poor fat lying little
pedophile, I guess I was looking ahead to Obamas high speed rail
buyoff
plans...

You cannot show any proof there was "millions" in corrupt payoffs to
unions in the big dig. Most of the corruption I read about
involved
corporations. This claim of yours is just your usual non-fact-based
bull****, little turd man.

Do your homework asshole.. I am not going to argue Unions with you,
that's like buying politicians and then going to them for collective
bargaining. You are living off the sweat of others who worked all their
lives, then you steal their retirement too.. Loser...creeper.. go
away..


As I've stated, you're just tossing more of your bull**** in here. You
have no proof that billions or millions of dollars in payoffs went to
unions whose members worked the big dig. Your pattern is to make up
outrageous crap about people or organizations you don't like, repeat it,
and hope it gets to be believed.

You are an insignificant turd, Ingersoll. You should have been forced to
get a vasectomy as soon as you reached puberty.


You are useless,plonk Leave me out of your creeper fantasy..


Not to worry, Snotty. I'm going to continue to call you out on every
political post of yours that is eyebrow deep in your made-up bull****.


#### ## ## #### ######
## ## ### ## ## ## ##
### #### ## ## ## ##
### ## #### ## #####
### ## ### ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ##
#### ## ## #### ####


###### #### ###### #### ## ##
## ## ## # ## # ## ## ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ## ##
##### ## ## ## ######
## ## ## ## ## ## ##
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
###### #### #### #### ## ##

BAR[_2_] March 13th 11 06:04 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 3/12/11 8:52 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleAZudnfBksIiQfOfQnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

Landing fees don't tell the whole story. It is *considerably* cheaper
to fly to Tampa rather than Orlando and hotels in Tampa are about half
the price of Orlando.

Yeah, but who the hell wants to fly to Tampa? There is nothing there.

Busch Gardens and prostitutes!



At least Tampa will have Harry as a customer.



Why? Are the females in your family setting up shop there, to service
the latest generation of marines?


You wish.


[email protected] March 13th 11 07:55 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.


Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.


All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

HenryK[_2_] March 13th 11 08:42 PM

It's snerk time in Florida...again.
 
On 3/13/2011 3:55 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800,
wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.


Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.


All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.


Hope you got proof before you go flapping those gums.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com