BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   A problem with deep-sixing pirates.... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/125041-problem-deep-sixing-pirates.html)

[email protected] February 25th 11 08:06 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:05:12 -0500, "MMC" wrote:



"Califbill" wrote in message
om...

"L G" wrote in message
m...

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In article933d9a82-a0c4-4a54-9c0f-733d53524607
@m7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com,
says...

is that they are possible going to bring children (future buccaneers)
with them as innocent human shields. Shag a couple boats loaded with
the just and the unjust alike and sooner or later the world court[s]
will hear about it and then condemnation will hit like the swarms of
Egypt.

Is a 14 year old holding an AK-47 on a pirate ship the same as a 14 year
old holding a Glock at the gas station?

It doesn't make any sense. We know the DOD monitors every inch of the
gulf, they surely must know which mother ship a skiff came from. As to
the "world courts", if you vaporize the mother ship and skiffs, there
will be nothing left for court;)

If Obama wanted to, he could stop this overnight...

He could have closed Gitmo, too. Wasn't that his first promise?

Reply:
Close Gitmo, transparency of government. Neither are happening. Publish on
the web White House visitors list. He would not even reveal the coal
industry lobbyists under a FOI act suit.

==========
He may not look like the other lying politicians that have been in that
chair but his actions are the same.


Total bs. Bush lied to the American people for 8+ years. Obama is at
least trying to do what's best for the country.

[email protected] February 25th 11 08:07 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 01:03:17 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:30:28 -0800,
wrote:

It's a military prison is it not? You claiming that all those patriots
in such a place would try and kill him? Do you really believe that
he's got to be confined 23.5 hours per day and have the lights left on
24/7 in order for him to be safe?


That is pretty much SOP in a supermax


He's not a danger to himself or others. He's not a violent criminal.
Assuming he broke the law, which hasn't yet been decided by a court,
he deserves to be treated humanely. That doesn't seem to be happening.

[email protected] February 25th 11 08:08 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:40:55 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:30:46 -0800,
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:22:05 -0500,
wrote:



That is an internal problem in the US that should be addressed. Maybe
when that Manning kid gets 20 years in Leavenworth people will start
respecting the security clearances they have.
The "good democrat" president, FDR, would have had Manning shot by now


Those were different times and the circumstances are totally
different. That said, I do think he should go to prison for a long
time. He broke the law. I don't think he should be isolated and
perhaps psychologically tortured, which is what seems to be happening



If the stuck him in a marine "red line" brig like Portsmouth he would
long for the peace and quiet of his little cell.
I do think they should have charged him with something by now. They
can charge him with a UCMJ violation (like an article 134) that would
not prevent further federal charges and they would have a legal reason
to keep him locked up until Holder figures out what he is going to do.

The fact still remains, military justice is not civilian justice and
lots of things you think of as rights do not exist. That is something
they tell you on day one of boot camp.
This is still an improvement over the old "articles of war" the
military used to abide by.


Which has nothing to do with how he's being treated.

I_am_Tosk February 25th 11 08:19 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:05:12 -0500, "MMC" wrote:



"Califbill" wrote in message
om...

"L G" wrote in message
m...

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In om,

says...

In article933d9a82-a0c4-4a54-9c0f-733d53524607
@m7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com,
says...

is that they are possible going to bring children (future buccaneers)
with them as innocent human shields. Shag a couple boats loaded with
the just and the unjust alike and sooner or later the world court[s]
will hear about it and then condemnation will hit like the swarms of
Egypt.

Is a 14 year old holding an AK-47 on a pirate ship the same as a 14 year
old holding a Glock at the gas station?

It doesn't make any sense. We know the DOD monitors every inch of the
gulf, they surely must know which mother ship a skiff came from. As to
the "world courts", if you vaporize the mother ship and skiffs, there
will be nothing left for court;)

If Obama wanted to, he could stop this overnight...

He could have closed Gitmo, too. Wasn't that his first promise?

Reply:
Close Gitmo, transparency of government. Neither are happening. Publish on
the web White House visitors list. He would not even reveal the coal
industry lobbyists under a FOI act suit.

==========
He may not look like the other lying politicians that have been in that
chair but his actions are the same.


Total bs. Bush lied to the American people for 8+ years. Obama is at
least trying to do what's best for the country.


Yeah, pushing revolution in the East, shutting down oil production,
deflating the dollar, running up the debt beyond recovery, sending bus
loads of mobs to private citizens homes and businesses to intimidate
them, yeah, a real hero.. snerk

BAR[_2_] February 26th 11 03:33 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
In article ,
says...

To not see what is going on, is stupid on so many levels... These people
tell you what they are doing and planning in their own words, and you
are still in denial.


Okay, so just when did Obama, "in his own words" say that he has "no
interest in anything that would bring stability to that area of the
world"? Just when did Obama say "in his own words" that "oil need to go
to 200 a barrel so he can finish collapsing the economy"? And what proof
do you have that he is "now paying thugs in Wisconsin, Ohio, and CT"?



Actions, actions speak louder than words.



[email protected] February 26th 11 05:38 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:18:55 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:01:38 -0800,
wrote:

I think we are only going to put a halt to the piracy when we sacrifice a
few hundred hostages held in Somalia and drop some huge conventional bombs
on the home areas of the pirates. Let god sort out who gets to go to heaven
and who goes elsewhere. Make the penalty huge for piracy. We will not do
it because of the collateral damage but that is probably one of the only
ways to stop the pirates. Most of the ones we kill are minor players. Not
the chiefs who are taking 80% of the ransom. Or figure out who the chiefs
are and destroy there home area.


So, it's ok to kill a bunch of innocent civilians? I guess there's no
reason to believe that most of these pirates are just acting out of
economic reality. The ultimate solution is a better economy in the
region.



$100m ransoms are not basic subsistence in a country where the average
annual income is about the price on an I phone.

Some day we will be asking "where is the money going"?

...OR ...

... We may be standing over another smoking hole in the ground and
know where some of it went.


Huh? Your solution is to bomb Somalia?

HenryK[_2_] February 26th 11 05:40 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 

$100m ransoms are not basic subsistence in a country where the average
annual income is about the price on an I phone.

Some day we will be asking "where is the money going"?

...OR ...

... We may be standing over another smoking hole in the ground and
know where some of it went.

Huh? Your solution is to bomb Somalia?

You don't think that would work? Do tell. We're all ears.

Harryk February 26th 11 05:43 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
On 2/26/11 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:18:55 -0500,
wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:01:38 -0800,
wrote:

I think we are only going to put a halt to the piracy when we sacrifice a
few hundred hostages held in Somalia and drop some huge conventional bombs
on the home areas of the pirates. Let god sort out who gets to go to heaven
and who goes elsewhere. Make the penalty huge for piracy. We will not do
it because of the collateral damage but that is probably one of the only
ways to stop the pirates. Most of the ones we kill are minor players. Not
the chiefs who are taking 80% of the ransom. Or figure out who the chiefs
are and destroy there home area.

So, it's ok to kill a bunch of innocent civilians? I guess there's no
reason to believe that most of these pirates are just acting out of
economic reality. The ultimate solution is a better economy in the
region.



$100m ransoms are not basic subsistence in a country where the average
annual income is about the price on an I phone.

Some day we will be asking "where is the money going"?

...OR ...

... We may be standing over another smoking hole in the ground and
know where some of it went.


Huh? Your solution is to bomb Somalia?


Well, we do have those thousands of nukes stockpiled, and no Soviet
Union on which to drop them... :)



Neville February 26th 11 05:57 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 


Huh? Your solution is to bomb Somalia?


Well, we do have those thousands of nukes stockpiled, and no Soviet
Union on which to drop them... :)


Waste not want not. Eh?

[email protected] February 26th 11 07:44 PM

A problem with deep-sixing pirates....
 
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:43:28 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 2/26/11 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:18:55 -0500,
wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:01:38 -0800,
wrote:

I think we are only going to put a halt to the piracy when we sacrifice a
few hundred hostages held in Somalia and drop some huge conventional bombs
on the home areas of the pirates. Let god sort out who gets to go to heaven
and who goes elsewhere. Make the penalty huge for piracy. We will not do
it because of the collateral damage but that is probably one of the only
ways to stop the pirates. Most of the ones we kill are minor players. Not
the chiefs who are taking 80% of the ransom. Or figure out who the chiefs
are and destroy there home area.

So, it's ok to kill a bunch of innocent civilians? I guess there's no
reason to believe that most of these pirates are just acting out of
economic reality. The ultimate solution is a better economy in the
region.


$100m ransoms are not basic subsistence in a country where the average
annual income is about the price on an I phone.

Some day we will be asking "where is the money going"?

...OR ...

... We may be standing over another smoking hole in the ground and
know where some of it went.


Huh? Your solution is to bomb Somalia?


Well, we do have those thousands of nukes stockpiled, and no Soviet
Union on which to drop them... :)


Sick, sick! :)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com