| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Warning to rec.boats
Harryk wrote:
On 2/12/11 7:13 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/12/11 3:01 PM, Harryk wrote: On 2/12/11 1:53 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/12/2011 6:56 AM, I am Tosk wrote: Now Harry/Paul/Secord guy Scott Secrd is posting the most vulgar nasty **** about my wife and daughter you could possibly post. If anybody knows where this guy can be found, please send it by. We need to stop this as soon as possible... Thank you... You've really lost it, fellow. I've never posted anything nasty about any of your family members. Please call (860) 297-0999 and get some help. For someone who rode into the group on his high horse trying to elevate the group's level of discourse you failed miserably. And, if it is true that you are a Professor at a University then your threat to engage in a cyber attack on a legal business should call your ethics into question. You thought you were being cute, but you were instigating conspiracy to commit a felony. I read that post...he made no such threat and instigated nothing. He never even mentioned the name of Snotty's fraud-filled commercial web site. You barely got out of high school, Bertie-Birther. You're rendering legal opinions is laughable. Actually he did say that he and many other people know computer "hackers" who could cause serious problems to anyone who runs a Internet Service. You must have missed that post, but it is available in Google. Harry is good at writing the veiled threat so we all know that he is able to identify a veiled threat when one when is written by someone else. Paul said no such thing about hackers. What he said was that some of his computer savvy students said it wasn't difficult to bring a site down. He never said he knew any "hackers," nor did he mention any specific sites. It's pretty much common knowledge that there are folks out there who can bring down sites. I doubt there is anything prosecutable in pointing out the obvious - that it is possible - without mentioning any specifics. But, hell, you boys are the high school graduates...barely. You wrote it so you should know. Are you about done with the "Paul" thing, WAFA? |
|
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to rec.boats
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:34:50 -0500, Harryk
wrote: On 2/12/11 7:13 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/12/11 3:01 PM, Harryk wrote: On 2/12/11 1:53 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/12/2011 6:56 AM, I am Tosk wrote: Now Harry/Paul/Secord guy Scott Secrd is posting the most vulgar nasty **** about my wife and daughter you could possibly post. If anybody knows where this guy can be found, please send it by. We need to stop this as soon as possible... Thank you... You've really lost it, fellow. I've never posted anything nasty about any of your family members. Please call (860) 297-0999 and get some help. For someone who rode into the group on his high horse trying to elevate the group's level of discourse you failed miserably. And, if it is true that you are a Professor at a University then your threat to engage in a cyber attack on a legal business should call your ethics into question. You thought you were being cute, but you were instigating conspiracy to commit a felony. I read that post...he made no such threat and instigated nothing. He never even mentioned the name of Snotty's fraud-filled commercial web site. You barely got out of high school, Bertie-Birther. You're rendering legal opinions is laughable. Actually he did say that he and many other people know computer "hackers" who could cause serious problems to anyone who runs a Internet Service. You must have missed that post, but it is available in Google. Harry is good at writing the veiled threat so we all know that he is able to identify a veiled threat when one when is written by someone else. Paul said no such thing about hackers. What he said was that some of his computer savvy students said it wasn't difficult to bring a site down. He never said he knew any "hackers," nor did he mention any specific sites. It's pretty much common knowledge that there are folks out there who can bring down sites. I doubt there is anything prosecutable in pointing out the obvious - that it is possible - without mentioning any specifics. But, hell, you boys are the high school graduates...barely. Hey, graduating high school is the equivalent of earning a JD in rec.boats. |
|
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Warning to rec.boats
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... On 2/12/11 4:31 PM, paul@byc wrote: On 2/12/2011 3:01 PM, Harryk wrote: On 2/12/11 1:53 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/12/2011 6:56 AM, I am Tosk wrote: Now Harry/Paul/Secord guy Scott Secrd is posting the most vulgar nasty **** about my wife and daughter you could possibly post. If anybody knows where this guy can be found, please send it by. We need to stop this as soon as possible... Thank you... You've really lost it, fellow. I've never posted anything nasty about any of your family members. Please call (860) 297-0999 and get some help. For someone who rode into the group on his high horse trying to elevate the group's level of discourse you failed miserably. And, if it is true that you are a Professor at a University then your threat to engage in a cyber attack on a legal business should call your ethics into question. You thought you were being cute, but you were instigating conspiracy to commit a felony. I read that post...he made no such threat and instigated nothing. He never even mentioned the name of Snotty's fraud-filled commercial web site. You barely got out of high school, Bertie-Birther. You're rendering legal opinions is laughable. What apparently has happened is that a bunch of nincompoops who supposedly were his friends got Ingersoll all reved up with nowhere to go. In that post that got the righties so excited, there is no threat to engage in any sort of attack, nor is there any instigating taking place. You really have to wonder if any of them every even completed high school. On the other hand, Ingersoll's oft-repeated claim that you are the sex offender in that Florida bulletin he keeps posting here when he knows it is not you is actionable per se. But a civil judgment against Ingersoll would be next to worthless, I would guess, and you would be out the lawyer fee. I'll pass. I have no desire to make Snotty's existence more miserable than it is. I agree, though, that his so-called "buddies" here have played him well. He fell right into the rabbit hole they dug, Harry, apparently Don needs some help. He said right here he was going to contact the FBI but he hasn't. One can only conclude that he is either a scared little pussy, or can't figure out how. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Warning to rec.boats | General | |||
| Is this prize winner a rec.boats or rec.boats.cruising denizen? | General | |||
| FAST-TRACK of RENAME uk.rec.boats.power to uk.rec.boats.motor | UK Power Boats | |||
| RFD: RENAME uk.rec.boats.power to uk.rec.boats.motor | UK Power Boats | |||
Linear Mode
