In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Since the 1980s, it seems, the so-called "free market" has not been
serving us with its credo of no real taxes on the wealthy, no real
regulation, no real government.

"Market driven quality" is no quality at all.

You have recently participated in Market Driven Quality. You get the
quality you are willing to pay for. You problem is that you do not want
others to have choices that are different from yours.

On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:39:36 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:38:39 -0800, wrote:

So, you think the small investor in a multinational has some actual
say in how the company is run and the ethics involved? It's only
recently that CEO pay has been on the table as needing non-binding
approval of the stockholders!

It doesn't really matter how much or how little say you have. If the
company is doing well, you share in the gains just like all of the
other owners. If it's not doing well you vote with your telephone and
sell the stock. Essentially you just fired the management.

The last six months have been very good to me. I have an unrealized gain
in one company of about 45%.

Thus, Obama is destroying the country...

On 2/2/11 7:49 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleW_SdnQEoj8MQAtTQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Since the 1980s, it seems, the so-called "free market" has not been
serving us with its credo of no real taxes on the wealthy, no real
regulation, no real government.

"Market driven quality" is no quality at all.

You have recently participated in Market Driven Quality. You get the
quality you are willing to pay for. You problem is that you do not want
others to have choices that are different from yours.



You're a birther, Bertie. Nothing you say politically is meaningful.

On 2/2/11 8:18 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In articleW_SdnQEoj8MQAtTQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Since the 1980s, it seems, the so-called "free market" has not been
serving us with its credo of no real taxes on the wealthy, no real
regulation, no real government.

"Market driven quality" is no quality at all.

You have recently participated in Market Driven Quality. You get the
quality you are willing to pay for. You problem is that you do not want
others to have choices that are different from yours.

Progressives believe that each and every person should have a choice, as
long as it is the choice they (progressives) have made... Anything else
is met with ignorance and intolerance.



I wouldn't object to you and your family getting or not getting abortions.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Doing well only refers to one aspect of a corporation's performance,
typically. The problem is that corporations have become the actual
government in many countries, such as this one, and corporate actions
are destroying the middle class.

Businesses/corporations have always run the world. You really do need to
brush up on some history.




Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

You're a real flatlander, eh?

You are an idiot.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/2/11 8:18 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In articleW_SdnQEoj8MQAtTQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Since the 1980s, it seems, the so-called "free market" has not been
serving us with its credo of no real taxes on the wealthy, no real
regulation, no real government.

"Market driven quality" is no quality at all.

You have recently participated in Market Driven Quality. You get the
quality you are willing to pay for. You problem is that you do not want
others to have choices that are different from yours.

Progressives believe that each and every person should have a choice, as
long as it is the choice they (progressives) have made... Anything else
is met with ignorance and intolerance.



I wouldn't object to you and your family getting or not getting abortions.

But, you object to each and every other choice that they make. Either
you are pro choice or you are pro abortion. It appears that you are only
pro abortion.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/2/11 7:49 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleW_SdnQEoj8MQAtTQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Since the 1980s, it seems, the so-called "free market" has not been
serving us with its credo of no real taxes on the wealthy, no real
regulation, no real government.

"Market driven quality" is no quality at all.

You have recently participated in Market Driven Quality. You get the
quality you are willing to pay for. You problem is that you do not want
others to have choices that are different from yours.



You're a birther, Bertie. Nothing you say politically is meaningful.

I see that you haven't denied participating in a Market Driven Quality
commercial transaction recently.

On 2/3/11 8:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Doing well only refers to one aspect of a corporation's performance,
typically. The problem is that corporations have become the actual
government in many countries, such as this one, and corporate actions
are destroying the middle class.

Businesses/corporations have always run the world. You really do need to
brush up on some history.




Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

On 2/3/11 8:49 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZs2dnZOE5ZfImtfQnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/2/11 8:18 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In articleW_SdnQEoj8MQAtTQnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Since the 1980s, it seems, the so-called "free market" has not been
serving us with its credo of no real taxes on the wealthy, no real
regulation, no real government.

"Market driven quality" is no quality at all.

You have recently participated in Market Driven Quality. You get the
quality you are willing to pay for. You problem is that you do not want
others to have choices that are different from yours.

Progressives believe that each and every person should have a choice, as
long as it is the choice they (progressives) have made... Anything else
is met with ignorance and intolerance.



I wouldn't object to you and your family getting or not getting abortions.

But, you object to each and every other choice that they make. Either
you are pro choice or you are pro abortion. It appears that you are only
pro abortion.



Pro-choice and pro-abortion are not competing concepts.
I think the choice of whether to get an abortion is up to the pregnant
female. So, I obviously am pro-choice. I think safe abortions should be
available to pregnant females everywhere. So, obviously, I am pro-abortion.

But that doesn't mean I am in favor of "forced" abortion, as your
statement seems to imply.

Once again, you exhibit your inability to engage in logical discussion
and debate.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Slavery used to be "legal" in this country until we made it illegal.

Slavery is still practiced around the world. Why am I not surprised that
you are not concerned with the condition of man outside the USA?


My comments were about the United States. My comments were not about the
rest of the world. Since my comments were limited, you have no idea
whether my concerns extend to the rest of the world. Your response was
not logical.

Are you pro slavery outside the USA?

We can change the negative impacts corporations have on society.

Why would we want to devolve to an agrarian society? Why do you want to
return to the days of 18th century?

Again, your comment is not logical. I offered no suggestion that we go
back to an agrarian society. I do believe we can control corporations.

You are always obtuse.

You obviously have never taken a rigorous course in logic or
participated on a debate team. You would have been laughed out of the
former and kicked off the latter. You have a teabagger's approach to
adult discussion.

You have a hard time with commitment don't you.