Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 276
Default Walmart is Doomed

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:23:54 -0800, jps wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:48:08 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 1/23/11 2:36 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:01:08 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:57:10 -0500, John
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:27:28 -0500, John wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb

Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!

We should tell WalMart how we feel about the practice.

I said the following:

" have just been informed, through the article below, of your policy with regard
to mail sent to the military at an APO address.

http://www.stripes.com/news/some-ret...resses-1.97267

As a retired soldier, I find the overcharges for mail delivered to the military
overseas an extremely repugnant practice. It is in poor taste to take advantage
of the military in such a manner. I can only commend "The Stars and Stripes" for
publishing the information.

Until I hear that this policy has been corrected, you'll not find me shopping at
WalMart. I will also do my best to spread the word about this practice.

Thank you for your time,

John Herring



You, et al, with your English language abilities, should be able to do much
better. Here's the place to go:

http://walmartstores.com/contactus/feedback.aspx

Whoops, this was meant for Gene. And, there was an 'I' at the beginning of the
first sentence.

I don't think they believe you will stop shopping there. You got it
off your chest, so you'll be back in there looking for rollbacks in no
time.

Anyway, Tosk thinks the practice is entirely justifiable, since their
software says it's OK...

Never said that at all, you are starting to act like the plum or Harry
if you are going to go down that road... All I said is that you were
guessing, not stating facts when you stated as fact, that they were
gouging and there was no way it cost them more... Period.

I also quoted an authority... a postmaster....

Maybe there's a few other opinions, too......
http://tinyurl.com/4r9bz29

What does the postmaster have to do with Logistics within Walmarts
operation? Has Obama gotten that far into our bedrooms?


Are you on those drugs again?


His patter is just a series of learned, right-wing cliches. It's
painful to read but a good lesson in how little it requires for people
to consider themselves informed.


The horse is dead, already.....


Gene, it was nice to see someone intelligent enough to debate and
disagree without name calling and insulting like Harry does.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 276
Default Walmart is Doomed

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 1/23/11 2:36 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:01:08 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:57:10 -0500, John
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:27:28 -0500, John wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb

Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!

We should tell WalMart how we feel about the practice.

I said the following:

" have just been informed, through the article below, of your policy with regard
to mail sent to the military at an APO address.

http://www.stripes.com/news/some-ret...resses-1.97267

As a retired soldier, I find the overcharges for mail delivered to the military
overseas an extremely repugnant practice. It is in poor taste to take advantage
of the military in such a manner. I can only commend "The Stars and Stripes" for
publishing the information.

Until I hear that this policy has been corrected, you'll not find me shopping at
WalMart. I will also do my best to spread the word about this practice.

Thank you for your time,

John Herring



You, et al, with your English language abilities, should be able to do much
better. Here's the place to go:

http://walmartstores.com/contactus/feedback.aspx

Whoops, this was meant for Gene. And, there was an 'I' at the beginning of the
first sentence.

I don't think they believe you will stop shopping there. You got it
off your chest, so you'll be back in there looking for rollbacks in no
time.

Anyway, Tosk thinks the practice is entirely justifiable, since their
software says it's OK...

Never said that at all, you are starting to act like the plum or Harry
if you are going to go down that road... All I said is that you were
guessing, not stating facts when you stated as fact, that they were
gouging and there was no way it cost them more... Period.

I also quoted an authority... a postmaster....

Maybe there's a few other opinions, too......
http://tinyurl.com/4r9bz29


What does the postmaster have to do with Logistics within Walmarts
operation? Has Obama gotten that far into our bedrooms?


Are you on those drugs again?


Can't answer the question huh? Now, show where Scotty has ever been on
drugs as you are stating, liar.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
Default Walmart is Doomed

On 1/23/11 3:23 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:36:10 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:01:08 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:57:10 -0500, John
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:27:28 -0500, John wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb

Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!

We should tell WalMart how we feel about the practice.

I said the following:

" have just been informed, through the article below, of your policy with regard
to mail sent to the military at an APO address.

http://www.stripes.com/news/some-ret...resses-1.97267

As a retired soldier, I find the overcharges for mail delivered to the military
overseas an extremely repugnant practice. It is in poor taste to take advantage
of the military in such a manner. I can only commend "The Stars and Stripes" for
publishing the information.

Until I hear that this policy has been corrected, you'll not find me shopping at
WalMart. I will also do my best to spread the word about this practice.

Thank you for your time,

John Herring



You, et al, with your English language abilities, should be able to do much
better. Here's the place to go:

http://walmartstores.com/contactus/feedback.aspx

Whoops, this was meant for Gene. And, there was an 'I' at the beginning of the
first sentence.

I don't think they believe you will stop shopping there. You got it
off your chest, so you'll be back in there looking for rollbacks in no
time.

Anyway, Tosk thinks the practice is entirely justifiable, since their
software says it's OK...

Never said that at all, you are starting to act like the plum or Harry
if you are going to go down that road... All I said is that you were
guessing, not stating facts when you stated as fact, that they were
gouging and there was no way it cost them more... Period.

I also quoted an authority... a postmaster....

Maybe there's a few other opinions, too......
http://tinyurl.com/4r9bz29

What does the postmaster have to do with Logistics within Walmarts
operation? Has Obama gotten that far into our bedrooms?


What has Obama or our bedrooms got to do with WalMart and APO
addresses?


As much as your Postmaster knows about how Walmart stores, and ships
it's materials internally..



Were you fired from wal-mart, too?
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Walmart is Doomed

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:26:24 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 1/23/11 3:23 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:36:10 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:01:08 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:57:10 -0500, John
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:27:28 -0500, John wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb

Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!

We should tell WalMart how we feel about the practice.

I said the following:

" have just been informed, through the article below, of your policy with regard
to mail sent to the military at an APO address.

http://www.stripes.com/news/some-ret...resses-1.97267

As a retired soldier, I find the overcharges for mail delivered to the military
overseas an extremely repugnant practice. It is in poor taste to take advantage
of the military in such a manner. I can only commend "The Stars and Stripes" for
publishing the information.

Until I hear that this policy has been corrected, you'll not find me shopping at
WalMart. I will also do my best to spread the word about this practice.

Thank you for your time,

John Herring



You, et al, with your English language abilities, should be able to do much
better. Here's the place to go:

http://walmartstores.com/contactus/feedback.aspx

Whoops, this was meant for Gene. And, there was an 'I' at the beginning of the
first sentence.

I don't think they believe you will stop shopping there. You got it
off your chest, so you'll be back in there looking for rollbacks in no
time.

Anyway, Tosk thinks the practice is entirely justifiable, since their
software says it's OK...

Never said that at all, you are starting to act like the plum or Harry
if you are going to go down that road... All I said is that you were
guessing, not stating facts when you stated as fact, that they were
gouging and there was no way it cost them more... Period.

I also quoted an authority... a postmaster....

Maybe there's a few other opinions, too......
http://tinyurl.com/4r9bz29

What does the postmaster have to do with Logistics within Walmarts
operation? Has Obama gotten that far into our bedrooms?

What has Obama or our bedrooms got to do with WalMart and APO
addresses?


As much as your Postmaster knows about how Walmart stores, and ships
it's materials internally..



Were you fired from wal-mart, too?


Obama is now the postmaster, you see. He's the face of "big
government" in a way the GW Bush never could be. Nevermind Bush
presided over the biggest percentage growth of government bureaucracy
in the history of the USA.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Walmart is Doomed

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:49:45 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:27:02 -0800, jps wrote:


Obama is now the postmaster, you see. He's the face of "big
government" in a way the GW Bush never could be. Nevermind Bush
presided over the biggest percentage growth of government bureaucracy
in the history of the USA.


This oblique foolishness sounds as ridiculous from you as it does
Tosk....

The horse is dead....


Giddy up!


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 173
Default Walmart is Doomed

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, "Ziggy®" wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb


Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!


Let's read this again, for content:

On a $120 purchase, Walmart.com charged $10.35 to ship to an APO
address, compared with $2.10 to a stateside address. For most items,
Amazon.com charged the same to ship to an APO address as a stateside
address. And Target offered shipping on a $120 purchase to an APO
address for less than to a stateside address.

$10.00 or $.10 why would you charge people more, just because they
have an APO address?Amazon didn't do it. Target didn't do it. In fact,
I'm not sure that you'd find anybody else doing it. It doesn't cost
any more to ship to an APO than any other address, why would you
charge more? Gouging.... and gouging folks on a fixed income that are
likely a serrated family... already under stress....





--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
-Thomas Sowell

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186


I'm sure this is just an oversight on Wal-Mart's part. They are sure to make
amends. With over 4000 stores in the US and being the worlds largest
retailer, they must be doing something right.

--
Ziggy®

  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default Walmart is Doomed

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, "Ziggy®" wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb


Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!


Let's read this again, for content:

On a $120 purchase, Walmart.com charged $10.35 to ship to an APO
address, compared with $2.10 to a stateside address. For most items,
Amazon.com charged the same to ship to an APO address as a stateside
address. And Target offered shipping on a $120 purchase to an APO
address for less than to a stateside address.

$10.00 or $.10 why would you charge people more, just because they
have an APO address?Amazon didn't do it. Target didn't do it. In fact,
I'm not sure that you'd find anybody else doing it. It doesn't cost
any more to ship to an APO than any other address, why would you
charge more? Gouging.... and gouging folks on a fixed income that are
likely a serrated family... already under stress....


Easy solution, don't buy from Wal-Mart.


  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
Default Walmart is Doomed

On 1/23/11 10:49 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb

Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!


Let's read this again, for content:

On a $120 purchase, Walmart.com charged $10.35 to ship to an APO
address, compared with $2.10 to a stateside address. For most items,
Amazon.com charged the same to ship to an APO address as a stateside
address. And Target offered shipping on a $120 purchase to an APO
address for less than to a stateside address.

$10.00 or $.10 why would you charge people more, just because they
have an APO address?Amazon didn't do it. Target didn't do it. In fact,
I'm not sure that you'd find anybody else doing it. It doesn't cost
any more to ship to an APO than any other address, why would you
charge more? Gouging.... and gouging folks on a fixed income that are
likely a serrated family... already under stress....


Easy solution, don't buy from Wal-Mart.



Great idea...spread the word.
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Walmart is Doomed

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:57:52 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:52:09 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:35:08 -0500, "Ziggy®" wrote some
crap I deleted:





It's all about WalMart....

http://tinyurl.com/4lh42dj

http://tinyurl.com/6xbaawb


Wow, a ten dollar shipping fee to get a package to some God forsaken
desert in God knows where.. Oooooo, never seen that before... NOT!

Man, we should put a target on one of their kids homes.... Yeah, that's
how we get our way!


Let's read this again, for content:

On a $120 purchase, Walmart.com charged $10.35 to ship to an APO
address, compared with $2.10 to a stateside address. For most items,
Amazon.com charged the same to ship to an APO address as a stateside
address. And Target offered shipping on a $120 purchase to an APO
address for less than to a stateside address.

$10.00 or $.10 why would you charge people more, just because they
have an APO address?Amazon didn't do it. Target didn't do it. In fact,
I'm not sure that you'd find anybody else doing it. It doesn't cost
any more to ship to an APO than any other address, why would you
charge more? Gouging.... and gouging folks on a fixed income that are
likely a serrated family... already under stress....


It's absolutely gouging. So do something about it.

http://walmartstores.com/contactus/feedback.aspx
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,103
Default Walmart is Doomed



"Gene" wrote in message ...


Let's read this again, for content:

On a $120 purchase, Walmart.com charged $10.35 to ship to an APO
address, compared with $2.10 to a stateside address. For most items,
Amazon.com charged the same to ship to an APO address as a stateside
address. And Target offered shipping on a $120 purchase to an APO
address for less than to a stateside address.

$10.00 or $.10 why would you charge people more, just because they
have an APO address?Amazon didn't do it. Target didn't do it. In fact,
I'm not sure that you'd find anybody else doing it. It doesn't cost
any more to ship to an APO than any other address, why would you
charge more? Gouging.... and gouging folks on a fixed income that are
likely a serrated family... already under stress....


Not to defend WalMart, but you guys are debating old, obsolete news, citing
articles written in Dec of 2009.
WalMart claims to have stopped charging extra to ship to APO addresses in
the same month and year.
Note the date of the release:

http://www.stripes.com/news/walmart-...ipping-1.97436

Eisboch







--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
-Thomas Sowell

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We're Doomed ChrisC General 4 October 16th 08 02:59 PM
Bush has doomed us Crash Test Dummy ASA 0 October 1st 07 03:14 AM
Bobsprit Doomed!!! Bob Crantz ASA 0 June 26th 04 02:10 AM
Bush is doomed!! Bobsprit ASA 0 January 29th 04 03:01 AM
We're all doomed .... Vito ASA 5 October 31st 03 01:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017