Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:13:35 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:14:28 -0500, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 12/10/2010 7:05 AM, Wayne.B wrote: http://www.clcboats.com/shop/boats/n...ng-dinghy.html Scroll down to the bottom of the page and watch the video. I'm trying to figure out if it could be scaled up to 18 feet or so and reassembled in the water. I don't know about that, but it sure is a pretty little boat. I prefer the one that doesn't come apart in the middle. I see the site has kits. I might buy a kit. Thanks! We have room to store a 12 to 13 foot dinghy on top of the aft cabin and use an electric hoist to launch it. Weight is an issue, maybe 400 to 500 lbs tops including outboard, fuel, anchor,etc. It looks like that Chesapeake dinghy separates into roughly 1/3 and 2/3rds of its length so I'm thinking 18 ft overall might be doable which is a nice size. I'd have to launch it in pieces and reassemble in the water however. Yikes! Assemble in the water? 13 ft. Whaler is 320 lbs dry without motor. 450-475 with a motor. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/10 12:01 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:13:35 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:14:28 -0500, wrote: On 12/10/2010 7:05 AM, Wayne.B wrote: http://www.clcboats.com/shop/boats/n...ng-dinghy.html Scroll down to the bottom of the page and watch the video. I'm trying to figure out if it could be scaled up to 18 feet or so and reassembled in the water. I don't know about that, but it sure is a pretty little boat. I prefer the one that doesn't come apart in the middle. I see the site has kits. I might buy a kit. Thanks! We have room to store a 12 to 13 foot dinghy on top of the aft cabin and use an electric hoist to launch it. Weight is an issue, maybe 400 to 500 lbs tops including outboard, fuel, anchor,etc. It looks like that Chesapeake dinghy separates into roughly 1/3 and 2/3rds of its length so I'm thinking 18 ft overall might be doable which is a nice size. I'd have to launch it in pieces and reassemble in the water however. Yikes! Assemble in the water? 13 ft. Whaler is 320 lbs dry without motor. 450-475 with a motor. I get the idea he's going to launch one half with him in it, and then row over to the other half for assembly. There are several possible outcomes. among them: It could work. It could work and be funny to watch. It could not work and be even funnier to watch. In any case, it's adventurous and probably not too dangerous. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:58 -0500, HarryK
wrote: On 12/10/10 12:01 PM, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:13:35 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:14:28 -0500, wrote: On 12/10/2010 7:05 AM, Wayne.B wrote: http://www.clcboats.com/shop/boats/n...ng-dinghy.html Scroll down to the bottom of the page and watch the video. I'm trying to figure out if it could be scaled up to 18 feet or so and reassembled in the water. I don't know about that, but it sure is a pretty little boat. I prefer the one that doesn't come apart in the middle. I see the site has kits. I might buy a kit. Thanks! We have room to store a 12 to 13 foot dinghy on top of the aft cabin and use an electric hoist to launch it. Weight is an issue, maybe 400 to 500 lbs tops including outboard, fuel, anchor,etc. It looks like that Chesapeake dinghy separates into roughly 1/3 and 2/3rds of its length so I'm thinking 18 ft overall might be doable which is a nice size. I'd have to launch it in pieces and reassemble in the water however. Yikes! Assemble in the water? 13 ft. Whaler is 320 lbs dry without motor. 450-475 with a motor. I get the idea he's going to launch one half with him in it, and then row over to the other half for assembly. There are several possible outcomes. among them: It could work. It could work and be funny to watch. It could not work and be even funnier to watch. In any case, it's adventurous and probably not too dangerous. Well, it could be amusing and adventurous, but it could be dangerous in anything but calm, warm waters. I can see the upside if it were the reserve dink and not the main. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:58 -0500, HarryK
wrote: I get the idea he's going to launch one half with him in it, and then row over to the other half for assembly. It wouldn't be that different from launching the present dinghy except for the reassembly. The small section would go in first with the bow painter on it, then tie it off on the stern of the big boat. Next you'd launch the big section with a stern line on it. Next step would be to get into the big section, line it up with the small one and bolt them together. It would be difficult in windy weather but we try to avoid that even now. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:58 -0500, HarryK wrote: I get the idea he's going to launch one half with him in it, and then row over to the other half for assembly. It wouldn't be that different from launching the present dinghy except for the reassembly. The small section would go in first with the bow painter on it, then tie it off on the stern of the big boat. Next you'd launch the big section with a stern line on it. Next step would be to get into the big section, line it up with the small one and bolt them together. It would be difficult in windy weather but we try to avoid that even now. Reply: Actually sounds very doable. Just make a bulkhead at the front of the large section and bulkhead at the back of the front section. Make it two boats. Then merge them with some large tapered alignment bins and instead of all bolts, a zeus type fastener. Or on second thought, the alignment pins are only tapered on the front and have a course Acme type thread to spin on large nuts quickly. Then a couple more bolts if needed.Maybe need a rubber plug in the bottom bolt holes while launching. The bulkheads would allow both sections to float and with a rubber washer on the connectors, no or little water entering the skiff. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 11, 1:17*am, "Califbill" wrote:
"Wayne.B" *wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:58 -0500, HarryK wrote: I get the idea he's going to launch one half with him in it, and then row over to the other half for assembly. It wouldn't be that different from launching the present dinghy except for the reassembly. * The small section would go in first with the bow painter on it, then tie it off on the stern of the big boat. * Next you'd launch the big section with a stern line on it. * Next step would be to get into the big section, line it up with the small one and bolt them together. *It would be difficult in windy weather but we try to avoid that even now. Reply: Actually sounds very doable. *Just make a bulkhead at the front of the large section and bulkhead at the back of the front section. *Make it two boats. Then merge them with some large tapered alignment bins and instead of all bolts, a zeus type fastener. *Or on second thought, the alignment pins are only tapered on the front and have a course Acme type thread to spin on large nuts quickly. *Then a couple more bolts if needed.Maybe need a rubber plug in the bottom bolt holes while launching. *The bulkheads would allow both sections to float and with a rubber washer on the connectors, no or little water entering the skiff. I have doubts about a long version because of the torque about the center from weight in the ends. This much less of a problem in a short one. Remember, you are really stressing the attachment points. I tried several ways to get the bolt idea to work including putting foam strips with small holes over the bolt holes to help seal the bolt holes; kinda sorta worked. I investigated "Slip nuts" for this to make assembly much faster but never used them. The seat on mine helps hold the two halves together by means of a slot cut into the seat lengthwise. I deepened this slot by putting strips on either side of the slot. This could be carried to an extreme to make the seat carry more of the torque. I also looked into using "Deep C clamps" available from Mcmaster-Carr (my toy store) but they seem very heavy. The stainless "Draw Clamps" from McMaster_Carr installed just below the rub rail on the outside so they do not extend beyond the rail work very well. They hold the halves together near the top. The seat holds them together across the boat. You still need a way to hold them together at the bottom. For this I got two pieces of 1/8" X 2" X6" pieces of stainless and bent them 90 degrees in the middle. I recessed them into the bottom of the back half with bolts and epoxy so the tab sticks up between the two halves about 1/8" from the bulkhead. On the other half, I made a recessed receptacle covered with another piece of SS. This is very strong, probably stronger than the bolts. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... On Dec 11, 1:17 am, "Califbill" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:58 -0500, HarryK wrote: I get the idea he's going to launch one half with him in it, and then row over to the other half for assembly. It wouldn't be that different from launching the present dinghy except for the reassembly. The small section would go in first with the bow painter on it, then tie it off on the stern of the big boat. Next you'd launch the big section with a stern line on it. Next step would be to get into the big section, line it up with the small one and bolt them together. It would be difficult in windy weather but we try to avoid that even now. Reply: Actually sounds very doable. Just make a bulkhead at the front of the large section and bulkhead at the back of the front section. Make it two boats. Then merge them with some large tapered alignment bins and instead of all bolts, a zeus type fastener. Or on second thought, the alignment pins are only tapered on the front and have a course Acme type thread to spin on large nuts quickly. Then a couple more bolts if needed.Maybe need a rubber plug in the bottom bolt holes while launching. The bulkheads would allow both sections to float and with a rubber washer on the connectors, no or little water entering the skiff. I have doubts about a long version because of the torque about the center from weight in the ends. This much less of a problem in a short one. Remember, you are really stressing the attachment points. I tried several ways to get the bolt idea to work including putting foam strips with small holes over the bolt holes to help seal the bolt holes; kinda sorta worked. I investigated "Slip nuts" for this to make assembly much faster but never used them. The seat on mine helps hold the two halves together by means of a slot cut into the seat lengthwise. I deepened this slot by putting strips on either side of the slot. This could be carried to an extreme to make the seat carry more of the torque. I also looked into using "Deep C clamps" available from Mcmaster-Carr (my toy store) but they seem very heavy. The stainless "Draw Clamps" from McMaster_Carr installed just below the rub rail on the outside so they do not extend beyond the rail work very well. They hold the halves together near the top. The seat holds them together across the boat. You still need a way to hold them together at the bottom. For this I got two pieces of 1/8" X 2" X6" pieces of stainless and bent them 90 degrees in the middle. I recessed them into the bottom of the back half with bolts and epoxy so the tab sticks up between the two halves about 1/8" from the bulkhead. On the other half, I made a recessed receptacle covered with another piece of SS. This is very strong, probably stronger than the bolts. Reply: You could make some stainless tabs that slipped into a receiver on the large section, etc. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:40:30 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:31:58 -0500, HarryK wrote: I get the idea he's going to launch one half with him in it, and then row over to the other half for assembly. It wouldn't be that different from launching the present dinghy except for the reassembly. The small section would go in first with the bow painter on it, then tie it off on the stern of the big boat. Next you'd launch the big section with a stern line on it. Next step would be to get into the big section, line it up with the small one and bolt them together. It would be difficult in windy weather but we try to avoid that even now. The important thing is to take lots of pictures and share them with us! |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:02:22 -0500, John H
wrote: It wouldn't be that different from launching the present dinghy except for the reassembly. The small section would go in first with the bow painter on it, then tie it off on the stern of the big boat. Next you'd launch the big section with a stern line on it. Next step would be to get into the big section, line it up with the small one and bolt them together. It would be difficult in windy weather but we try to avoid that even now. The important thing is to take lots of pictures and share them with us! You know I'd do that. I'm beginning to have my doubts about the feasability of the "stretch" modification however. Some good points have been raised about the stresses at the attachment point joining the two halves. Growing the boat larger would only make that worse, especially with an outboard big enough to reach planing speeds. The design was intended as a small rowing and sailing dinghy and that is probably where it should stay. I'm thinking that one of Scott's Brockway Skiffs could probably be built as a two piece boat that would be more suitable for a big outboard if the right attachment method could be found. It would be heavy though unless built with high tech materials. http://www.yaimkool.com/ http://photobucket.com/images/brockway%20skiff/ |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:37:57 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:02:22 -0500, John H wrote: It wouldn't be that different from launching the present dinghy except for the reassembly. The small section would go in first with the bow painter on it, then tie it off on the stern of the big boat. Next you'd launch the big section with a stern line on it. Next step would be to get into the big section, line it up with the small one and bolt them together. It would be difficult in windy weather but we try to avoid that even now. The important thing is to take lots of pictures and share them with us! You know I'd do that. I'm beginning to have my doubts about the feasability of the "stretch" modification however. Some good points have been raised about the stresses at the attachment point joining the two halves. Growing the boat larger would only make that worse, especially with an outboard big enough to reach planing speeds. The design was intended as a small rowing and sailing dinghy and that is probably where it should stay. I'm thinking that one of Scott's Brockway Skiffs could probably be built as a two piece boat that would be more suitable for a big outboard if the right attachment method could be found. It would be heavy though unless built with high tech materials. http://www.yaimkool.com/ http://photobucket.com/images/brockway%20skiff/ Well, I'll bet if you two put your heads together he could come up with a satisfactory design and build a damn decent boat for you. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boat building vs camper building | General | |||
Boat kit (folbot) in western NC | General | |||
Antique boat kit still in boxes | Boat Building | |||
Easy kayak building kit | Boat Building | |||
pirogue boat kit | Boat Building |