On 12/6/2010 5:54 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/6/10 5:13 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article4IadnWG1YPViw2DRnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/6/10 5:06 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:42:35 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700,
wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their
pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give
the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he
be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is "not
ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not
call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

If you'll check , you'll find several of my posts going after the
disrupters, ID
spoofers, name-callers, etc.

His post wasn't racist. You and others here have always accused
conservatives
against Obama's policies of being 'racist'. You, et al, have used
that as 'the
reason' many disagree with him. Guess what - a whole hell of a lot
of Democrats
are racist also, if your definition is meaningful.


Sorry, Herring, but you are among the last people whose opinion I would
accept as to what is or is not "racist" or "religious."

Un-called for... Thought you were gonna' try harder?


I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

See, I told you it wouldn't be long before I reverted to my old self.

Let the games begin...

On 12/6/10 5:13 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article4IadnWG1YPViw2DRnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/6/10 5:06 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:42:35 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is "not ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

If you'll check , you'll find several of my posts going after the disrupters, ID
spoofers, name-callers, etc.

His post wasn't racist. You and others here have always accused conservatives
against Obama's policies of being 'racist'. You, et al, have used that as 'the
reason' many disagree with him. Guess what - a whole hell of a lot of Democrats
are racist also, if your definition is meaningful.


Sorry, Herring, but you are among the last people whose opinion I would
accept as to what is or is not "racist" or "religious."

Un-called for... Thought you were gonna' try harder?



I mostly leave Herring alone, but that doesn't mean I accept his
opinions on racism or religion. If he is going to make religious posts
here, I'm going to call him out on them.

HarryK wrote:
On 12/6/10 5:13 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article4IadnWG1YPViw2DRnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/6/10 5:06 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:42:35 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700,
wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their
pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give
the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually,
racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he
be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is
"not ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the
disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not
call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

If you'll check , you'll find several of my posts going after the
disrupters, ID
spoofers, name-callers, etc.

His post wasn't racist. You and others here have always accused
conservatives
against Obama's policies of being 'racist'. You, et al, have used
that as 'the
reason' many disagree with him. Guess what - a whole hell of a lot
of Democrats
are racist also, if your definition is meaningful.


Sorry, Herring, but you are among the last people whose opinion I would
accept as to what is or is not "racist" or "religious."

Un-called for... Thought you were gonna' try harder?


I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.
Do it and STFU. No one needs an announcement from you.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:54:46 -0500, wrote:


I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

Truth be told everyone is a racist at one level or another. I
believe it is a survival instinct left over from our cave dwelling
days, sort of a built in fear/distrust of anyone different. It's not
just a "white" thing either.


True Dat.

On 12/6/10 6:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:54:46 -0500, wrote:

I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

Truth be told everyone is a racist at one level or another.


Bull****.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:49:15 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/6/10 5:13 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article4IadnWG1YPViw2DRnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/6/10 5:06 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:42:35 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is "not ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

If you'll check , you'll find several of my posts going after the disrupters, ID
spoofers, name-callers, etc.

His post wasn't racist. You and others here have always accused conservatives
against Obama's policies of being 'racist'. You, et al, have used that as 'the
reason' many disagree with him. Guess what - a whole hell of a lot of Democrats
are racist also, if your definition is meaningful.


Sorry, Herring, but you are among the last people whose opinion I would
accept as to what is or is not "racist" or "religious."

Un-called for... Thought you were gonna' try harder?



I mostly leave Herring alone, but that doesn't mean I accept his
opinions on racism or religion. If he is going to make religious posts
here, I'm going to call him out on them.

Got me shakin' in my boots, to say the least!!!

On 12/6/10 8:58 PM, John H wrote:



I mostly leave Herring alone, but that doesn't mean I accept his
opinions on racism or religion. If he is going to make religious posts
here, I'm going to call him out on them.

Got me shakin' in my boots, to say the least!!!

It matters not to me. I'll simply be watching you and the other righties
turn this newsgroup back into a pile of warm ****. You and your boys got
a good start today. Keep it up.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:01:28 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

On 12/6/10 6:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:54:46 -0500, wrote:

I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

Truth be told everyone is a racist at one level or another.


Bull****.

I think what he said is basically right. I think it's very difficult
to overcome all prejudice for all people. I don't think it's possible.
It doesn't just have to be about skin color...

On 12/6/10 9:52 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:01:28 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/6/10 6:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:54:46 -0500, wrote:

I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

Truth be told everyone is a racist at one level or another.


Bull****.

I think what he said is basically right. I think it's very difficult
to overcome all prejudice for all people. I don't think it's possible.
It doesn't just have to be about skin color...


Race mostly implies skin color, typically. If you want to broaden what
Wayne posited to include all sorts of prejudice, then, sure.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:02:50 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/6/10 9:52 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:01:28 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/6/10 6:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:54:46 -0500, wrote:

I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

Truth be told everyone is a racist at one level or another.


Bull****.

I think what he said is basically right. I think it's very difficult
to overcome all prejudice for all people. I don't think it's possible.
It doesn't just have to be about skin color...


Race mostly implies skin color, typically. If you want to broaden what
Wayne posited to include all sorts of prejudice, then, sure.

Ok... well, I see your point. I wasn't being so nuanced with the term
racism, although I think he still could be right. It's very tough to
avoid racism. One must be vigilant.