On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

Political crap not wanted here.

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is "not ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:42:35 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is "not ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

If you'll check , you'll find several of my posts going after the disrupters, ID
spoofers, name-callers, etc.

His post wasn't racist. You and others here have always accused conservatives
against Obama's policies of being 'racist'. You, et al, have used that as 'the
reason' many disagree with him. Guess what - a whole hell of a lot of Democrats
are racist also, if your definition is meaningful.

On 12/6/10 5:06 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:42:35 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is "not ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

If you'll check , you'll find several of my posts going after the disrupters, ID
spoofers, name-callers, etc.

His post wasn't racist. You and others here have always accused conservatives
against Obama's policies of being 'racist'. You, et al, have used that as 'the
reason' many disagree with him. Guess what - a whole hell of a lot of Democrats
are racist also, if your definition is meaningful.


Sorry, Herring, but you are among the last people whose opinion I would
accept as to what is or is not "racist" or "religious."

On 12/6/10 5:13 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article4IadnWG1YPViw2DRnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/6/10 5:06 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:42:35 -0500, wrote:

On 12/6/10 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:41:38 -0500, wrote:

On 12/5/10 5:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:08:21 -0700,
wrote:

On 01/12/2010 7:23 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/1/10 9:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/11/2010 7:42 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0700, wrote:


Bill leaked while he was in office.

Hilary too leaked while she is in office.

What a pair of leaky b00bs.

Or is it better to say they both got caught with their pants down?

'Twould be better to take this crap to alt.politics.

No humor. Typical sour puss. So when is Obama going to give the old boot
the boot?


Your posts aren't funny; they're just stupid or, usually, racist.

Coming from a can't be critical of presidente Obama because he be black
I will take this as a compliment.

You're ok with being complemented on being a racist? Wow.

It's the nicest compliment he's ever received.

How about both of you stop the name-calling?

Hmmm. It's "ok" for someone to make racist comments, but it is "not ok"
to call that person out for it?

How about you spend some of your time here going after the disrupters,
ID spoofers, racists, sexists, et cetera.

Oh, and if you were a careful reader, you would see that I did not call
Canuck a racist. I noted that his *comments* were either stupid or
racist. Perhaps you should avoid commenting on posts that deal with
language and its nuances.

If you'll check , you'll find several of my posts going after the disrupters, ID
spoofers, name-callers, etc.

His post wasn't racist. You and others here have always accused conservatives
against Obama's policies of being 'racist'. You, et al, have used that as 'the
reason' many disagree with him. Guess what - a whole hell of a lot of Democrats
are racist also, if your definition is meaningful.


Sorry, Herring, but you are among the last people whose opinion I would
accept as to what is or is not "racist" or "religious."

Un-called for... Thought you were gonna' try harder?


I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:54:46 -0500, HarryK wrote:

I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

Truth be told everyone is a racist at one level or another. I
believe it is a survival instinct left over from our cave dwelling
days, sort of a built in fear/distrust of anyone different. It's not
just a "white" thing either.

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:40:02 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:54:46 -0500, HarryK wrote:

I call a spade a spade, and Herring is a racist. I really should just
put him in my bozo bin and be done with him.

Truth be told everyone is a racist at one level or another. I
believe it is a survival instinct left over from our cave dwelling
days, sort of a built in fear/distrust of anyone different. It's not
just a "white" thing either.

You're probably right, but that doesn't excuse racist behavior.
There's no survival instinct that requires people to open their mouth
and display it.