On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:50:55 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 11/17/10 1:49 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:26:25 -0500, wrote:

On 11/17/10 1:19 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:55 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have nothing else
to occupy their meager talents.

You think professional help would work? I expect a frypan or
accidental death would be more effective.


We still have a handful of juvenile delinquents posting here, with the
emphasis on juvenile. I just bozo-bin 'em as soon as they reveal
themselves. It wouldn't surprise me to learn the ID spoofer is one of
the guys posting snarky comments here with a new handle and is ****ed
because I ignore him.

It's not just your attention they're vying for, it's anyone's
attention.

Like I said, a frypan upside the head is the most likely cure.


As I said, the best thing to do with 'em is to either filter them out or
ignore them.

It's my normal course.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:55 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



"Paul@BYC" wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have nothing
else
to occupy their meager talents.

You think professional help would work? I expect a frypan or
accidental death would be more effective.

You're probably right, but we Canadians are supposed to be a kinder, gentler
bunch. ;-)

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:48:23 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:55 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



"Paul@BYC" wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have nothing
else
to occupy their meager talents.

You think professional help would work? I expect a frypan or
accidental death would be more effective.

You're probably right, but we Canadians are supposed to be a kinder, gentler
bunch. ;-)

And by a good margin, you are. Same percentage of gun owership,
1/100th of gun deaths/capita.

On 11/17/10 4:27 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:48:23 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:55 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have nothing
else
to occupy their meager talents.

You think professional help would work? I expect a frypan or
accidental death would be more effective.

You're probably right, but we Canadians are supposed to be a kinder, gentler
bunch. ;-)

And by a good margin, you are. Same percentage of gun owership,
1/100th of gun deaths/capita.

well it looks like guns really are not the problem. Heck, even Harry
hasn't killed anyone yet. If he had, he would have posted some photos
of his kill.

--
Spoofers can go to Hell in a handbasket

On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

An American buddy sent this to me. At the bottom is a link of related
interest.

"Let me get this straight...
We're going to be "gifted" with a health care
plan we are forced to purchase and
fined if we don't,

and it'll be a blessing since right now if you lose your job you are
FORCED to either pay for your own healtcare or you DIE

which is fine with the right wing

written by a committee whose chairman
says he doesn't understand it,

gee. who understands our PRIVATE healthcare system?

passed by a Congress that didn't read it but
exempted themselves from it,

gee...do they have the CURRENT healthcare private insurance?


and signed by a President who smokes,

HAHAHAHA so what??


with funding administered by a treasury chief who
didn't pay his taxes,

gee. the rich dont pay taxes. who knew?

for which we'll be taxed for four years before any
benefits take effect,

we're ALREADY taxed for the MOST EXPENSIVE LEAST EFFECTIVE healthcare
system in the world

by a government which has
already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,

and how did wall street do on the economy in the last few years? how's
your 401K looking, courtesy of wall street?

all to be overseen by a surgeon general
who is obese,

more bull****

and financed by a country that's broke!!!!!

courtesy of WALL STREET

What the heck could
possibly go wrong?"

we COULD continue on the current course with PRIVATE enterprise. then
we'd be ****ed


Realted:

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/st...tal-death.html

Socialist medicine for you. Money for government and let the people eat
cake.

socialist medicine works

private enterprise does NOT

YukonBound wrote:


"Paul@BYC" wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have
nothing else to occupy their meager talents.
Say what?

HarryK wrote:
On 11/17/10 1:19 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:55 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have
nothing else
to occupy their meager talents.

You think professional help would work? I expect a frypan or
accidental death would be more effective.


We still have a handful of juvenile delinquents posting here, with the
emphasis on juvenile. I just bozo-bin 'em as soon as they reveal
themselves. It wouldn't surprise me to learn the ID spoofer is one of
the guys posting snarky comments here with a new handle and is ****ed
because I ignore him.
Yet Slammer is still filling you inbox. WAFH!

HarryK wrote:
On 11/17/10 1:49 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:26:25 -0500, wrote:

On 11/17/10 1:19 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:55 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have
nothing else
to occupy their meager talents.

You think professional help would work? I expect a frypan or
accidental death would be more effective.


We still have a handful of juvenile delinquents posting here, with the
emphasis on juvenile. I just bozo-bin 'em as soon as they reveal
themselves. It wouldn't surprise me to learn the ID spoofer is one of
the guys posting snarky comments here with a new handle and is ****ed
because I ignore him.

It's not just your attention they're vying for, it's anyone's
attention.

Like I said, a frypan upside the head is the most likely cure.


As I said, the best thing to do with 'em is to either filter them out
or ignore them.
Listen to him or suffer the consequences.

On 11/17/2010 1:26 PM, HarryK wrote:

We still have a handful of juvenile delinquents posting here, with the
emphasis on juvenile. I just bozo-bin 'em as soon as they reveal
themselves. It wouldn't surprise me to learn the ID spoofer is one of
the guys posting snarky comments here with a new handle and is ****ed
because I ignore him.

You didn't ignore me, you can't. I must respond.

On 17/11/2010 12:48 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:07:55 -0400, "YukonBound"
wrote:



"Paul@BYC" wrote in message
...
On 11/17/2010 7:04 AM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:11 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:29 -0700,
wrote:

An ..............


.....PLONK.......................


We'll know you're no longer a hypocrite when you finally plonk me!


You're still ID spoofing Harry. I'll bet it is because you're being
ignored with your other new ID here too. Right? Of course right.



No surprise to me.
These people can't change without professional help. They have
nothing else
to occupy their meager talents.

You think professional help would work? I expect a frypan or
accidental death would be more effective.

You're probably right, but we Canadians are supposed to be a kinder,
gentler bunch. ;-)

I hope you don't believe that bu11sh1t. I met some pretty good
Americans when I lived there for 10 years. This notional that we are
somehow intrinsically different is utter political nonsense.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.