On Oct 9, 1:14*pm, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/9/10 1:39 PM, Tim wrote:



On Oct 9, 12:28 pm, *wrote:
On *9-Oct-2010, *wrote:

On Oct 9, 11:59 am, *wrote:
Given the absurd quantity of spoofing by the self-identified righties
that
has been so extreme that it even ran a number of their own ranks away,
I'd
say you are making a wise decision. Spirited repartee is one thing,
stalking
and threats really does cross a line.

LOL! I didn't know you had to be a 'rightie' to spoof.

Tim, you aren't reading for content. Note that I said, "by the
self-identified righties." 95% of the spoofing has been by the rabid far
right. And THAT by THEIR OWN ADMISSION.

Who could forget this gem by FlaJim, when trying to convince Frogwatch to
stay?

"Whoa! We ID spoof to drive the libs and moderates out of here...not a
fellow rightie, especially one as edgy as you are."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/82c5483....

hmmm, I see what you're saying, I dont' get into such because i post
on google and don't use a reader so I'm not really privy to sorting
out who is who and what is what. and I dont' live on here like some so
there's lots of posts/threads I totally miss.

So, maybe I miss a lot, but I didnt' *think so.

If driving the "libs and moderates out of here" is the goal as stated by
flajim, it is a goal they haven't achieved.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

and it never will be. Nor the other way around.

But the place can sure get messy.

On 10/9/10 2:19 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:14 pm, Secular wrote:
On 10/9/10 1:39 PM, Tim wrote:



On Oct 9, 12:28 pm, wrote:
On 9-Oct-2010, wrote:

On Oct 9, 11:59 am, wrote:
Given the absurd quantity of spoofing by the self-identified righties
that
has been so extreme that it even ran a number of their own ranks away,
I'd
say you are making a wise decision. Spirited repartee is one thing,
stalking
and threats really does cross a line.

LOL! I didn't know you had to be a 'rightie' to spoof.

Tim, you aren't reading for content. Note that I said, "by the
self-identified righties." 95% of the spoofing has been by the rabid far
right. And THAT by THEIR OWN ADMISSION.

Who could forget this gem by FlaJim, when trying to convince Frogwatch to
stay?

"Whoa! We ID spoof to drive the libs and moderates out of here...not a
fellow rightie, especially one as edgy as you are."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/82c5483...

hmmm, I see what you're saying, I dont' get into such because i post
on google and don't use a reader so I'm not really privy to sorting
out who is who and what is what. and I dont' live on here like some so
there's lots of posts/threads I totally miss.

So, maybe I miss a lot, but I didnt' think so.

If driving the "libs and moderates out of here" is the goal as stated by
flajim, it is a goal they haven't achieved.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

and it never will be. Nor the other way around.

But the place can sure get messy.


Flajim is still here, ID spoofing.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

On Oct 9, 1:28*pm, wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 08:55:19 -0400, Secular Humouresque



wrote:
On 10/9/10 8:44 AM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 7:24 am, Secular *wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:12 PM, Tim wrote:

On Oct 8, 8:52 pm, * *wrote:
Tim wrote:
http://mywebtimes.com/archives/ottaw....php?id=415267

i wish more stations offered non-blended fuel. If there was easier
access for pure fossil fuel, I probably would have second thoughts
about converting my pontoon over to a 4 cycle and ditching the v-4
Johnson.

E15 is OK for newer motors - so they say...

And it possible may be, but mine is a 1977. *And I'll probably run it
till it craters, then use up my spare 115 evinrude I have sitting int
he back of my building.

And maybe gas stations should sell leaded fuel to accommodate the owners
of old wreck cars.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

They do! * Older cars run fairly well on the un-leaded fuel available
today even on the 15 % ethanol blend.

. But you don't have to have ethanol in every motor fuel.

i don't recall when ethanol became part of the gasoline that is sold
everywhere, but none of the outboards I've owned dating back to the
1990's every had any fuel-related problems, even when 60 gallons of it
sat in the boat over the winter. That list of outboards includes 90, 115
and 135 hp mercs, and 150 and 225 hp yamahas. Maybe it would be easier
for you to buy a decent used outboard made in this century.

The guys over on pontoon boat forum where they really talk about boats
has an ongoing thread about ethanol. The big problem from what I see
is it goes bad faster

Which goes to show that A.Boater hit it right when he said "Just the
SMELL of the fuel tells you the stuff has a shelf life about equal
to milk. "

On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:26:08 -0400, Secular Humouresque
wrote:

That's why *no* details of our new boat will be posted here.

Then, since you will have nothing to talk about, you should go away.

"Tim" wrote in message ...
On Oct 9, 1:14 pm, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/9/10 1:39 PM, Tim wrote:



On Oct 9, 12:28 pm, wrote:
On 9-Oct-2010, wrote:

On Oct 9, 11:59 am, wrote:
Given the absurd quantity of spoofing by the self-identified righties
that
has been so extreme that it even ran a number of their own ranks away,
I'd
say you are making a wise decision. Spirited repartee is one thing,
stalking
and threats really does cross a line.

LOL! I didn't know you had to be a 'rightie' to spoof.

Tim, you aren't reading for content. Note that I said, "by the
self-identified righties." 95% of the spoofing has been by the rabid far
right. And THAT by THEIR OWN ADMISSION.

Who could forget this gem by FlaJim, when trying to convince Frogwatch to
stay?

"Whoa! We ID spoof to drive the libs and moderates out of here...not a
fellow rightie, especially one as edgy as you are."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/82c5483....

hmmm, I see what you're saying, I dont' get into such because i post
on google and don't use a reader so I'm not really privy to sorting
out who is who and what is what. and I dont' live on here like some so
there's lots of posts/threads I totally miss.

So, maybe I miss a lot, but I didnt' think so.

If driving the "libs and moderates out of here" is the goal as stated by
flajim, it is a goal they haven't achieved.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

and it never will be. Nor the other way around.

But the place can sure get messy.


I think A Boater is just giving the pot a little stir. Who would ever dis the moderates, of which I am one.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID.

The magnificent Boatless Harry

"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message m...
On 10/9/10 2:19 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:14 pm, Secular wrote:
On 10/9/10 1:39 PM, Tim wrote:



On Oct 9, 12:28 pm, wrote:
On 9-Oct-2010, wrote:

On Oct 9, 11:59 am, wrote:
Given the absurd quantity of spoofing by the self-identified righties
that
has been so extreme that it even ran a number of their own ranks away,
I'd
say you are making a wise decision. Spirited repartee is one thing,
stalking
and threats really does cross a line.

LOL! I didn't know you had to be a 'rightie' to spoof.

Tim, you aren't reading for content. Note that I said, "by the
self-identified righties." 95% of the spoofing has been by the rabid far
right. And THAT by THEIR OWN ADMISSION.

Who could forget this gem by FlaJim, when trying to convince Frogwatch to
stay?

"Whoa! We ID spoof to drive the libs and moderates out of here...not a
fellow rightie, especially one as edgy as you are."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/82c5483...

hmmm, I see what you're saying, I dont' get into such because i post
on google and don't use a reader so I'm not really privy to sorting
out who is who and what is what. and I dont' live on here like some so
there's lots of posts/threads I totally miss.

So, maybe I miss a lot, but I didnt' think so.

If driving the "libs and moderates out of here" is the goal as stated by
flajim, it is a goal they haven't achieved.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

and it never will be. Nor the other way around.

But the place can sure get messy.


Flajim is still here, ID spoofing.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Who cares. One spoofer more or less doesn't matter. Fact is they are driving you batty, and that is a good thing.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID.

The magnificent Boatless Harry

On 10/9/10 3:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:26:08 -0400, Secular Humouresque
wrote:

That's why *no* details of our new boat will be posted here.

Then, since you will have nothing to talk about, you should go away.


Wax on, wax off, w'hine.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

On 10/9/2010 3:30 PM, Harry® wrote:
"Secular wrote in message m...
On 10/9/10 2:19 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 1:14 pm, Secular wrote:
On 10/9/10 1:39 PM, Tim wrote:



On Oct 9, 12:28 pm, wrote:
On 9-Oct-2010, wrote:

On Oct 9, 11:59 am, wrote:
Given the absurd quantity of spoofing by the self-identified righties
that
has been so extreme that it even ran a number of their own ranks away,
I'd
say you are making a wise decision. Spirited repartee is one thing,
stalking
and threats really does cross a line.

LOL! I didn't know you had to be a 'rightie' to spoof.

Tim, you aren't reading for content. Note that I said, "by the
self-identified righties." 95% of the spoofing has been by the rabid far
right. And THAT by THEIR OWN ADMISSION.

Who could forget this gem by FlaJim, when trying to convince Frogwatch to
stay?

"Whoa! We ID spoof to drive the libs and moderates out of here...not a
fellow rightie, especially one as edgy as you are."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...thread/82c5483...

hmmm, I see what you're saying, I dont' get into such because i post
on google and don't use a reader so I'm not really privy to sorting
out who is who and what is what. and I dont' live on here like some so
there's lots of posts/threads I totally miss.

So, maybe I miss a lot, but I didnt' think so.

If driving the "libs and moderates out of here" is the goal as stated by
flajim, it is a goal they haven't achieved.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

and it never will be. Nor the other way around.

But the place can sure get messy.


Flajim is still here, ID spoofing.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Who cares. One spoofer more or less doesn't matter. Fact is they are driving you batty, and that is a good thing.


I suppose you could ask him, but I don't see any evidence of your ID
spoofing, as you term it, driving anyone batty. In fact, you and the
other "ID spoofers" seem to be just about completely ignored by the
object of your affection. If anything, you and "the boys" seem obsessed
about him.

This sort of says everything about you and your boys that needs to be said:

"Whoa! We ID spoof to drive the libs and moderates out of here...not a
fellow rightie, especially one as edgy as you are."

That's a very telling statement.

Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/9/10 12:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 9, 9:09 am, wrote:
I thought that was pretty clear.

If you don't personally KNOW that 10% alcohol is a disaster, you aren't
actually USING the boat. An addition of 50% MORE alcohol will be an
even
greater disaster.

In the 4 years since MTBE was banned and they stared putting alcohol in
fuel, I have overhauled the carbs on one engine twice and on the larger
boat, was forced to pay to polish the fuel to get the crap out of
the tank
before it worked its way into the engine fuel system.

Just the SMELL of the fuel tells you the stuff has a shelf life
about equal
to milk.



"If you don't personally KNOW that 10% alcohol is a disaster, you
aren't actually USING the boat. An addition of 50% MORE alcohol will
be an even greater disaster.

Well, I USE my boats, but they have chevy engines in them, they seem
to run on the 89.5 stuff just fine., and I agree that a 50/50 blend is
no really a good nor a practical idea.

And I know the modern stabilizers help the older 2 cycles, but it
seems that the way of the two stroke will probably go the way of the
steam engine.

"Just the SMELL of the fuel tells you the stuff has a shelf life about
equal to milk."

You mean it lasts that long?


Have you tried a good external fuel filter/water separator?
All of my outboards since the 1990's have had these, in addition to
any "under the hood" filter/separators the motors have had.

This spring, after sitting in the tanks of my Parker since November
2009, the 60 gallons of ethanol/gasoline had no trouble starting my
Yamaha start on the first try. It wasn't until two weekends later than
I had burned most of the fuel off and refilled the tank to 100 gallons.

You haven't burned 60 gallons of fuel in a boat in the last ten years,
WAFA.

A.Boater wrote:
Given the absurd quantity of spoofing by the self-identified righties that
has been so extreme that it even ran a number of their own ranks away, I'd
say you are making a wise decision. Spirited repartee is one thing, stalking
and threats really does cross a line.

If you learned to quote, we might know WTF you are talking about.