bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:58:51 -0400, wrote:



bpuharic wrote:


On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:08:43 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


buchanan was pres before lincoln. he had an opportunity to prevent the
civil war. lincoln cleaned up his mess




As Republicans often do...


HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you...

bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!!

very funny!



WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh?

bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM


Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president.

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:44:49 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:00:22 -0400, wrote:





why? cant figure yours out?



No need. The alternator on my boat keeps mine charged. Using your boat
will have the same results.

your ignorance abounds. overwhelms. it's a wonder of nature

Since you cleverly snipped your failure, care to explain how my response
was ignorant?

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, LG wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, wrote:



HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you...

bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!!

very funny!



WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh?

bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM


Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president.

he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country.

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, wrote:




HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you...

bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!!

very funny!




WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh?


bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM



Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president.

he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country.


Sure he is, lemming. Wait for the RNC to march in next month and hold
him accountable for his bizarre actions.

In article ,
says...

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:45:48 -0400, wrote:




HHAHAHAHAHA!! you really give me a laff every time i read you...

bush cleaned up a mess!! you could be a stand up comic!!

very funny!




WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh?


bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM



Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president.

he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country.


Sure he is, lemming. Wait for the RNC to march in next month and hold
him accountable for his bizarre actions.

They're going to run his ass back to Chicago on a rail.. But he will be
rich and powerful so he really won't care. Vacations for life, and a
great pension Either way, the sad part is so many Americans like
myself were excited (even though we voted the other way) to have elected
our first black president and now history will show him to be the worst
president in history.

Imagine, being the first president since Carter, to be compared to
Carter... ?

--
OH, I could do the 105 footer, but I would hate to waste the last few
seconds of my life with my eyes closed, screaming like a little
girl...

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:04:42 -0400, LG wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, wrote:


bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM



Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president.

he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country.


Sure he is, lemming. Wait for the RNC to march in next month and hold
him accountable for his bizarre actions.

got anything but teabagger cliches? afraid to do you own thinking?

yes the RNC will wn next month. 34% of americans are conservative

which is to say, they think in bumperstickers like you do

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 21:03:20 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:28:35 -0400, wrote:



WTF? I know you are nearly blind but you CAN still read, eh?


bush and his rich budddies treat the middle class like an ATM



Obama is president now, Bob. A lousy president.

he's a great president. it's the GOP that's destroying the country.


Sure he is, lemming. Wait for the RNC to march in next month and hold
him accountable for his bizarre actions.

They're going to run his ass back to Chicago on a rail..

of course they will. he actually did something for the american people
instead of for the rich. americans prefer fantasy to reality.


But he will be
rich and powerful so he really won't care. Vacations for life, and a
great pension Either way, the sad part is so many Americans like
myself were excited (even though we voted the other way) to have elected
our first black president and now history will show him to be the worst
president in history.

HAHAHAHA....worst president...bush, of course, was white and rich...

bush caused the worst depression in 80 years and gave the rich a
massive inc ome boost

no wonder you hate the darkie

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:22 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


to prevent europeans from throwing in their lot with the south in a
balance of power play

The war started in 1861. The fact that Lincoln,
a Republican, the party of anti-slavery was elected POTUS, was a driving
force for the South to start seceding, but was enough to cause states to
start seceding. You do realize the Emancipation Proclamation did not
free
all the slaves? Only the slaves in Northern (Union) controlled states

there were almost no slaves in the north. some in maryland...a few in
other states..

the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

"Califbill" wrote in message
m...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:09:22 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:


to prevent europeans from throwing in their lot with the south in a
balance of power play

The war started in 1861. The fact that Lincoln,
a Republican, the party of anti-slavery was elected POTUS, was a
driving
force for the South to start seceding, but was enough to cause states
to
start seceding. You do realize the Emancipation Proclamation did not
free
all the slaves? Only the slaves in Northern (Union) controlled states

there were almost no slaves in the north. some in maryland...a few in
other states..

the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

So, for those who did own slaves, that was ok with you... got it. No Federal
standards. Anything goes when you cross a state line. Who gives a damn about
a neighbor. You certainly don't.

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property