the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

For much of this period Canada took it in the ass like companies did in
your
country. It has improved faster in Canada, but will not return to 2000 to
2004 levels.

well, no. canada suffered less because it's more left wing than the US
and regulated its banks. the US got killed because more americans are
conservatives and belief your kinds of horse****

Full employment of minimum wage clerks (crap wages, not the artificial
and
destructive statute minimum wage) is fine for the equivalent lifestyle

yeah in the US this means giving the rich even MORE of our money

. The
previous subject was the middle class. Wages stagnated and decreased due
to
a tremendous decrease in demand for everything from design and
engineering
to factory labor.

because the rich stripped mined the middle class. you want the rich to
keep doing it with all your fables

I had a machine department manager that offered to take
the job at the same rate I paid my secretary 18 years prior. Why? The
market sets the price of wages. Always.

rather strange, then, that the germans dont have the big difference
between middle class and elite income, isnt it?

you keep ignoring this. you just refuse to address it, with your right
wing bull****


If you aren't needed, why would you
be paid more, or be employed at all? What I'm explaining is visible to
the
naked eye

you're the helen keller of economics.

Forget all of your wild rants above - they're senseless:

My REVERSAL AND RETRACTION::

I have analyzed new information and have to retract my previous
recommendations and position.

There is no chance that multi-level production (concept, styling, design,
engineering, tool, management and production)can return to your country, the
United States. The current, and unlikely to be repealed encumbrances
prohibit companies from "moving back." The costs of operating in the U.S.
are prohibitive, so even if it were to happen, they could NOT be affordable
to pay the staff and labor for a long period without sales.

It would take the workforce (all higher end and tech jobs plus general
labor) months if not years to earn enough to afford U.S. products at the
prices necessary due to the costs of production.

It follows that the firms I expected to move back will not be able to
produce without customers, and the middle class would not be able to "hang
on" until their wages and incomes could then afford US production. The
companies would have
increased costs and no customers for a lengthy period. The lag would be too
great, the companies would fold or have to move out, as has already
happened.

Sorry about the bad news.

The stupidity of increased taxes (????) and the maniacal political party
rants still remain dysfunctional, counter productive and in fact,
destructive.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

(there's a dirty word
to you) and in socialist structures, inflation.

i love it. i'm for a decent middle class wage. that makes me a
socialist!!

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Live in ignoarance (contrary to the lazy fools, ignorance is not bliss) and
see my recent post of retraction. Companies are NOT coming back, so get over
it. This is what I now believe.

My reversal and retraction:

I have analyzed new information and have to retract my previous
recommendations and position.

There is no chance that multi-level production can return to your country,
the United States. The current, and unlikely to be repealed encumbrances
prohibit companies from "moving back." The costs of operating in the U.S.
are prohibitive, so even if it were to happen, they could NOT be affordable
to the staff and labor for a long period.

It would take the workforce (all higher end and tech jobs plus general
labor) months if not years to earn enough to afford U.S. products at the
prices mandated due to the costs of production.

It follows that the firms that I predicted to be able to move back will not
be able to produce without immediate customers, and the middle class would
not be able to "hang on" until their wages and incomes could then afford US
production. The companies would have increased costs and no customers for a
lengthy period. The lag would be too great, the companies would fold or
have to move out, as has already happened.

Sorry about the bad news.

The stupidity of increased taxes (????) and moronic D vs R rants are still a
waste of keyboard strokes.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:


Why? Do I look like Mr. Magoo? (came in 2nd to Hussein in 2008)

no, but you think like him. and i met the guy who used to draw him

October 1 is "DRAW A FUNNY PICTURE OF MOHAMMED DAY!"

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Sorry, I didn't know Farah Fawcett was a turd burglar.

she was, sorry

Damm..so fine in her early years


Guess I did hit close to home, eh?

why? you seem to have a fascination for the issue. you a fan of
santorum?

No fascination, and, Santorum is an R, so he/she/it fits the venue of
corruption.

I'd just like the media to avoid publishing images of 2 deviants with pink
hair smooching on the front steps of a city hall. Was the Communications
Decency Act repealed?

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Good grief... stick to what you know. I know that's pretty limited, but
give
us all a break. I can just imagine that you and your right-wing nut
friends
would think cancer is funny.

yeah they sit around the dinner table working themselves into a sweat
thinking about people 'committing sodomy'....not realzing alot of
straights do it, too.

pathetic actually

Normal people corn hole each other???? I missed that. Fortunately.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 27-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

emplotyment? ZIP. No reason, ior need, for productive output to expand
in
the U.S.

They (both sides) certainly have a clue. They know what to do. I've
outlined
it in the last post.

So, now you're claiming productivity shouldn't increase? Do you want to
pick
one and let us know...

Productivity will increase if you call minimum wage clerks learning
functional English productivity.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 9/28/10 4:20 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 28-Sep-2010, wrote:

Good grief... stick to what you know. I know that's pretty limited, but
give
us all a break. I can just imagine that you and your right-wing nut
friends
would think cancer is funny.

yeah they sit around the dinner table working themselves into a sweat
thinking about people 'committing sodomy'....not realzing alot of
straights do it, too.

pathetic actually

Normal people corn hole each other???? I missed that. Fortunately.


You need to log onto Scotty's "other" site.



--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 27-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

emplotyment? ZIP. No reason, ior need, for productive output to expand
in
the U.S.

They (both sides) certainly have a clue. They know what to do. I've
outlined
it in the last post.

So, now you're claiming productivity shouldn't increase? Do you want to
pick
one and let us know...

Productivity will increase if you call minimum wage clerks learning
functional English productivity.

What a nonsense response. Is that the best you have to offer?

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 27-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Productivity = output compared to cost. Higher output at lower cost in
the
same environment = increased productivity. I have no idea what the
Toyota
driving Walmart crowd "thinks."


Which has nothing to do with less manpower. You can have greater
productivity with technical solutions, for example, or by understanding
standard time-study relationships... by working smarter, productivity
increases.

You said the same as I did, with 5% more detail. If you can sell 100,000
televisions in the U.S. at a cost of $48.00 each, then move production to
Mexico and produce them at $24.00 each, you've doubled yield, and
therefore
productivity. Automation has been the greatest boost to productivity
since
the late 70's.

Which has nothing to do with the increase in productivity that most
companies talk about. It's about efficiency is how a particular worker does
his/her job.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Good grief... stick to what you know. I know that's pretty limited, but
give
us all a break. I can just imagine that you and your right-wing nut
friends
would think cancer is funny.

yeah they sit around the dinner table working themselves into a sweat
thinking about people 'committing sodomy'....not realzing alot of
straights do it, too.

pathetic actually

Normal people corn hole each other???? I missed that. Fortunately.

Wow... you're a homophobe. What a shocker.