![]() |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
|
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
|
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:49:06 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Why not read the USCG reports that say no explosion and no oil spill? They were onsite, not 3,000 miles away, sitting on an agenda. Oh, so it was just a huge fireball, unless you're claiming the photos are doctored. You live too close to Hollywood. Fireballs are not explosions, no matter what you see on TV. Oh come on! 13 people went into the water. It wasn't some simple fire-extinguisher fire. There were injuries. It was certainly classified as an explosion. You can have a huge fire without an explosion. They may have abandoned ship because they thought there might be an explosion but it was just a fire. If I was on an oil platform that was on fire I might jump overboard too. What is surprising is that they didn't have a life boat. Maybe Steve can shed some light on that. So, a fire ball isn't an explosion? That's just loony. It absolutely was an explosion. The system FAILED. People went in the water and people were injured. Didn't have or didn't use a life boat? That's an example of the system working???? |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:49:06 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Why not read the USCG reports that say no explosion and no oil spill? They were onsite, not 3,000 miles away, sitting on an agenda. Oh, so it was just a huge fireball, unless you're claiming the photos are doctored. You live too close to Hollywood. Fireballs are not explosions, no matter what you see on TV. Oh come on! 13 people went into the water. It wasn't some simple fire-extinguisher fire. There were injuries. It was certainly classified as an explosion. You can have a huge fire without an explosion. They may have abandoned ship because they thought there might be an explosion but it was just a fire. If I was on an oil platform that was on fire I might jump overboard too. What is surprising is that they didn't have a life boat. Maybe Steve can shed some light on that. I am not well informed on the incident. Lifeboats are definitely not standard. Escape capsules are mandatory. There is a huge difference. If the fire or dangerous area was in an area close to the escape capsule, maybe that would preclude its use. Sometimes, the fires disable the electrical supply, or at least temporarily shut them down. The escape capsules can be dropped by a mechanically freewheeling device that has a brake on it. And, IIRC, there is a device that when all else fails, allows the boat to simply freefall. Depends on height as to how that turns out. In the eighties, it became MANDATORY for every person who met certain criteria to go to a day long training course held at a facility that had a full scale mock up of the escape devices. Those would have been present, and the men would have been trained in their use. I will read up on the actual facts, and try to learn if they were actually swimming when picked up, or were in an escape capsule. Sometimes, men in that situation will jump into the water rather than take the escape device because of their fear of the device, their location relative to where they would have to go to get to it, or just plain panic. I'll read up. Steve |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 10:25:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:49:06 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Why not read the USCG reports that say no explosion and no oil spill? They were onsite, not 3,000 miles away, sitting on an agenda. Oh, so it was just a huge fireball, unless you're claiming the photos are doctored. You live too close to Hollywood. Fireballs are not explosions, no matter what you see on TV. Oh come on! 13 people went into the water. It wasn't some simple fire-extinguisher fire. There were injuries. It was certainly classified as an explosion. You can have a huge fire without an explosion. They may have abandoned ship because they thought there might be an explosion but it was just a fire. If I was on an oil platform that was on fire I might jump overboard too. What is surprising is that they didn't have a life boat. Maybe Steve can shed some light on that. So, a fire ball isn't an explosion? That's just loony. It absolutely was an explosion. The system FAILED. People went in the water and people were injured. No it isn't. "Explosion" implies a shock wave and blast effect. In fact most real explosions do not have a fire ball. They use explosives to put out fires. Wow... so, I guess they didn't need to jump into the water and Bloomberg, the LA Times, Reuters, AOLnews, and untold others are just making it up. No mention of shock wave here... so are you making things up? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/explosion Didn't have or didn't use a life boat? That's an example of the system working???? Just like all the explosion stories and the mile long oil slick stories the press has consistently got this wrong. (according to the Coast Guard) I think I will wait to hear what really happened before I let my knee jerk. There was an oil slick, but it wasn't from the BOP and well. It was from the platform most-likely, as several sources have asserted. I have no idea when or if your knee is going to jerk. That would be your business. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 16:43:57 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: So, a fire ball isn't an explosion? That's just loony. It absolutely was an explosion. The system FAILED. People went in the water and people were injured. No it isn't. "Explosion" implies a shock wave and blast effect. In fact most real explosions do not have a fire ball. They use explosives to put out fires. Wow... so, I guess they didn't need to jump into the water and Bloomberg, the LA Times, Reuters, AOLnews, and untold others are just making it up. A fire is plenty of reason to abandon ship. An explosion might have actually put the fire out. That is how they put out oil well fires. No mention of shock wave here... so are you making things up? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/explosion I was in ordinance for 6 years I know what an explosion is. There is a shock wave when you have an explosion Just because an english major does not understand this when they write a dictionary is not relevant. You actually use the speed of the wave front to rate the power of explosives. That is the main difference between a high explosive like TNT and a low explosive like black powder. The word you want to google is brisance. From your universal reference for everything Wikipedia "Brisance is of practical importance for determining the effectiveness of an explosion in fragmenting shells, bomb casings, grenades, structures, and the like. A brisant explosive is one that attains its maximum pressure so rapidly that a shock wave is formed." There are those words! Firstly, you may have experience with ordinance, but that doesn't make you knowledgeable about generic explosions and the wave form that follows any ignition. If there is ignition, there is a wave formed. The reference you gave is for explosive ordinance, not ignition. Try again. Didn't have or didn't use a life boat? That's an example of the system working???? Just like all the explosion stories and the mile long oil slick stories the press has consistently got this wrong. (according to the Coast Guard) I think I will wait to hear what really happened before I let my knee jerk. There was an oil slick, but it wasn't from the BOP and well. It was from the platform most-likely, as several sources have asserted. I have no idea when or if your knee is going to jerk. That would be your business. I guess I just believe the USCG report. They don't have an axe to grind or newspapers to sell. Feel free to read into whatever report you want. The facts on the ground showed a slick. It was determined not be from the well, but rather from the platform. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 16:43:57 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: No mention of shock wave here... so are you making things up? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/explosion ======= Carefully read the second sentence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosion No shockwave, no explosion. On the other hand I'm sure you got your money's worth with the free dictionary. How is that sailboat purchase coming along? |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 20:02:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: If there is ignition, there is a wave formed. Absolutely incorrect. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
On 9/5/10 11:22 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleX46dnXBzo58xIx7RnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@giganews. com, says... On 9/5/10 11:26 AM, Jim wrote: wrote: On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:49:06 -0700, wrote: Why not read the USCG reports that say no explosion and no oil spill? They were onsite, not 3,000 miles away, sitting on an agenda. Oh, so it was just a huge fireball, unless you're claiming the photos are doctored. You live too close to Hollywood. Fireballs are not explosions, no matter what you see on TV. Oh come on! 13 people went into the water. It wasn't some simple fire-extinguisher fire. There were injuries. It was certainly classified as an explosion. You can have a huge fire without an explosion. They may have abandoned ship because they thought there might be an explosion but it was just a fire. If I was on an oil platform that was on fire I might jump overboard too. What is surprising is that they didn't have a life boat. Maybe Steve can shed some light on that. There are plenty of news reports saying they couldn't get to the lifeboats. No reason to be surprised about "no lifeboat." Probably scared by the explosion and fire, or it was centered near the lifeboat station and they didn't want to go there. I think every news account I've seen mentions "explosion." You can argue about the definition of "explosion." Some say Mentos in coke bottle qualifies. They all had survival suits on, so I expect evacuation procedure is to don the suit before mustering at the lifeboat. There's probably a pdf out there on the nets with an oil rig evacuation procedure. But there were no safety violations on that rig. It was a simple act of God. Explosion, fire, jumping 50' into the sea is just all part of a days work for oil rig workers. They're tough guys who put their fate into the hands of God. Don't need no safety procedures. Just ask them. Jim - Speculate until proven wrong, then go into denial mode. Hertvik, It is great to see you back. Whose wife is he going to call this time? Look you stupid little ****, JohnH deserved that phone call. He asked for it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com