![]() |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:56:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... Jordon wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:08 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jordon" wrote in message ... http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/02/rescue-efforts-underway-after-oil-rig-accident-in-gulf/?hpt=T2 Drill baby drill Burn baby burn Lie baby lie This may actually be an example of the system working. If the reports are right there were no fatalities and no oil was spilled. That is better than the normal drive time experience in your major city. Oil rig worker is a safer job than cab driver There's a mile-long slick, according the news. An explosion is the "system working"??? Just because there's oil on the water doesn't mean it came from the well. I'm sure they have diesel generators on the rig and you need to store the fuel. The explosion could have blown that up. There wasn't an explosion or an oil slick. Early reports are often full of bad information. As usual, you're the one who's a liar. http://www.wdsu.com/r/24854300/detail.html Did you read the article? "Troedson said Thursday afternoon that Coast Guard boats and aircraft have not been able to find a sheen." It was the title of the article That's nice. The "system" didn't work, however. They're just lucky nobody died. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
"Secular Humanist" wrote in message ... In article , says... wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:08 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jordon" wrote in message ... http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/02/rescue-efforts-underway-after-oil-rig-accident-in-gulf/?hpt=T2 Drill baby drill Burn baby burn Lie baby lie This may actually be an example of the system working. If the reports are right there were no fatalities and no oil was spilled. That is better than the normal drive time experience in your major city. Oil rig worker is a safer job than cab driver There's a mile-long slick, according the news. An explosion is the "system working"??? Knee jerk reaction. No oil escaped. You are a moron. In any case, the "system" didn't work. When the "system" works, there's no fire, explosion, and people in the water. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
In article ,
says... wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:56:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... Jordon wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:08 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jordon" wrote in message ... http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/02/rescue-efforts-underway-after-oil-rig-accident-in-gulf/?hpt=T2 Drill baby drill Burn baby burn Lie baby lie This may actually be an example of the system working. If the reports are right there were no fatalities and no oil was spilled. That is better than the normal drive time experience in your major city. Oil rig worker is a safer job than cab driver There's a mile-long slick, according the news. An explosion is the "system working"??? Just because there's oil on the water doesn't mean it came from the well. I'm sure they have diesel generators on the rig and you need to store the fuel. The explosion could have blown that up. There wasn't an explosion or an oil slick. Early reports are often full of bad information. As usual, you're the one who's a liar. http://www.wdsu.com/r/24854300/detail.html Did you read the article? "Troedson said Thursday afternoon that Coast Guard boats and aircraft have not been able to find a sheen." It was the title of the article That's nice. The "system" didn't work, however. They're just lucky nobody died. Damned unions. Don't care anything about keeping their workforce safe, just take money from the companies. Oh, wait, I claim here to be a union hack. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:38:08 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve B" wrote in message ... "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:13:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I agree that it may not have come from the well. Seems like a distinction without a difference. Oil in the water is still oil in the water. Actually there is a huge difference if you think about it: Oil from the platform equipment is finite and will stop relatively quickly; Oil from the well can take months to control as we have seen. But, in the case of BP, the shutoff valves did not work. This one, from what I see, the shutoffs worked, and with the slick being finally described as less than a mile big, there wasn't a lot of fluid lost from anything. The wells seem to have "shut in". Which means the closers worked and are holding the oil back. It IS a production rig, and that means that the wells have been drilled, and oil may be coming out under its own pressure. If any natural gas is present, that stuff is highly pressurized. Have you ever been boating, and noticed how big a sheen a tiny bit of gas makes? A mile long slick could be like a few hundred gallons, maybe less. Steve Heart surgery pending? Read up and prepare. Learn how to care for a friend. http://cabgbypasssurgery So, I guess that the BOP worked. Great. At the failure rate of 40%, they got lucky. Tell us again about how the system worked with a fire, explosion, and people in the water? There was no explosion. The system worked because they had an accident and nobody was seriously injured and there was no oil spill. We still don't know what caused the fire but the rumor is it was a welding accident. That happens wherever they weld. It would be wonderful if all occupations were totally accident free and nobody was killed at work but that is not the case. It turns out oil driller is actually pretty far down the list of most dangerous jobs, far behind construction workers, cops and firemen. Loggers and fishermen have a job that is about 5-6 times as dangerous. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...form-explosion |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:56:24 -0700, wrote: wrote in message ... Jordon wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:08 -0700, wrote: wrote in message ... http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/02/rescue-efforts-underway-after-oil-rig-accident-in-gulf/?hpt=T2 Drill baby drill Burn baby burn Lie baby lie This may actually be an example of the system working. If the reports are right there were no fatalities and no oil was spilled. That is better than the normal drive time experience in your major city. Oil rig worker is a safer job than cab driver There's a mile-long slick, according the news. An explosion is the "system working"??? Just because there's oil on the water doesn't mean it came from the well. I'm sure they have diesel generators on the rig and you need to store the fuel. The explosion could have blown that up. There wasn't an explosion or an oil slick. Early reports are often full of bad information. As usual, you're the one who's a liar. http://www.wdsu.com/r/24854300/detail.html Did you read the article? "Troedson said Thursday afternoon that Coast Guard boats and aircraft have not been able to find a sheen." It was the title of the article And there was no explosion: http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/09/02/lou....html?hpt=Sbin And an "attorney" is calling me a liar? |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
On 9/3/10 8:12 PM, Larry wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:56:24 -0700, wrote: wrote in message ... Jordon wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:08 -0700, wrote: wrote in message ... http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/02/rescue-efforts-underway-after-oil-rig-accident-in-gulf/?hpt=T2 Drill baby drill Burn baby burn Lie baby lie This may actually be an example of the system working. If the reports are right there were no fatalities and no oil was spilled. That is better than the normal drive time experience in your major city. Oil rig worker is a safer job than cab driver There's a mile-long slick, according the news. An explosion is the "system working"??? Just because there's oil on the water doesn't mean it came from the well. I'm sure they have diesel generators on the rig and you need to store the fuel. The explosion could have blown that up. There wasn't an explosion or an oil slick. Early reports are often full of bad information. As usual, you're the one who's a liar. http://www.wdsu.com/r/24854300/detail.html Did you read the article? "Troedson said Thursday afternoon that Coast Guard boats and aircraft have not been able to find a sheen." It was the title of the article And there was no explosion: http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/09/02/lou....html?hpt=Sbin And an "attorney" is calling me a liar? She's not the only one, Dan, DK, Bob, Larry, and, of course, your real name: Asshole. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
Secular Humorist wrote:
On 9/3/10 8:12 PM, Larry wrote: wrote: On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:56:24 -0700, wrote: wrote in message ... Jordon wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:24:08 -0700, wrote: wrote in message ... http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/02/rescue-efforts-underway-after-oil-rig-accident-in-gulf/?hpt=T2 Drill baby drill Burn baby burn Lie baby lie This may actually be an example of the system working. If the reports are right there were no fatalities and no oil was spilled. That is better than the normal drive time experience in your major city. Oil rig worker is a safer job than cab driver There's a mile-long slick, according the news. An explosion is the "system working"??? Just because there's oil on the water doesn't mean it came from the well. I'm sure they have diesel generators on the rig and you need to store the fuel. The explosion could have blown that up. There wasn't an explosion or an oil slick. Early reports are often full of bad information. As usual, you're the one who's a liar. http://www.wdsu.com/r/24854300/detail.html Did you read the article? "Troedson said Thursday afternoon that Coast Guard boats and aircraft have not been able to find a sheen." It was the title of the article And there was no explosion: http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/09/02/lou....html?hpt=Sbin And an "attorney" is calling me a liar? She's not the only one, Dan, DK, Bob, Larry, and, of course, your real name: Asshole. Funny stuff from WAFA in 20639. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 15:09:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:38:08 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Steve B" wrote in message ... "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:13:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I agree that it may not have come from the well. Seems like a distinction without a difference. Oil in the water is still oil in the water. Actually there is a huge difference if you think about it: Oil from the platform equipment is finite and will stop relatively quickly; Oil from the well can take months to control as we have seen. But, in the case of BP, the shutoff valves did not work. This one, from what I see, the shutoffs worked, and with the slick being finally described as less than a mile big, there wasn't a lot of fluid lost from anything. The wells seem to have "shut in". Which means the closers worked and are holding the oil back. It IS a production rig, and that means that the wells have been drilled, and oil may be coming out under its own pressure. If any natural gas is present, that stuff is highly pressurized. Have you ever been boating, and noticed how big a sheen a tiny bit of gas makes? A mile long slick could be like a few hundred gallons, maybe less. Steve Heart surgery pending? Read up and prepare. Learn how to care for a friend. http://cabgbypasssurgery So, I guess that the BOP worked. Great. At the failure rate of 40%, they got lucky. Tell us again about how the system worked with a fire, explosion, and people in the water? There was no explosion. The system worked because they had an accident and nobody was seriously injured and there was no oil spill. We still don't know what caused the fire but the rumor is it was a welding accident. That happens wherever they weld. It would be wonderful if all occupations were totally accident free and nobody was killed at work but that is not the case. It turns out oil driller is actually pretty far down the list of most dangerous jobs, far behind construction workers, cops and firemen. Loggers and fishermen have a job that is about 5-6 times as dangerous. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...form-explosion \ Hummm British newspaper over hypes a rig fire British Petroleum doesn't own. I'm Shocked! Why not read the USCG reports that say no explosion and no oil spill? They were onsite, not 3,000 miles away, sitting on an agenda. Oh, so it was just a huge fireball, unless you're claiming the photos are doctored. |
Another oil rig explodes in the Gulf
wrote in message ... On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:10:50 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: So, I guess that the BOP worked. Great. At the failure rate of 40%, they got lucky. Tell us again about how the system worked with a fire, explosion, and people in the water? There was no explosion. The system worked because they had an accident and nobody was seriously injured and there was no oil spill. We still don't know what caused the fire but the rumor is it was a welding accident. That happens wherever they weld. It would be wonderful if all occupations were totally accident free and nobody was killed at work but that is not the case. It turns out oil driller is actually pretty far down the list of most dangerous jobs, far behind construction workers, cops and firemen. Loggers and fishermen have a job that is about 5-6 times as dangerous. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...form-explosion \ Hummm British newspaper over hypes a rig fire British Petroleum doesn't own. I'm Shocked! Why not read the USCG reports that say no explosion and no oil spill? They were onsite, not 3,000 miles away, sitting on an agenda. Oh, so it was just a huge fireball, unless you're claiming the photos are doctored. You live too close to Hollywood. Fireballs are not explosions, no matter what you see on TV. Oh come on! 13 people went into the water. It wasn't some simple fire-extinguisher fire. There were injuries. It was certainly classified as an explosion. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com