Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,736
Default OT La Migra redux

On Aug 19, 7:14*am, "Harry ?" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:23:14 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


That was a figure of speech but the gun is still there.


So what? You can be respectful and still tell someone to bugger off
without
a warrant.


You have not had much contact with cops have you?


Pardon? You have? My my.


Last I checked you're not required to answer questions without an
attorney
present. You're also not required to let your house or business be
searched
without a warrant or reasonable probable cause. Has something changed?
OK
I asked again.
This is how it goes. Three federal agents walk in, show credentials
and give you a list of the names of the people they suspect have
fraudulent papers and ask for your copy of their employment records.


So far so good.


If you can't document due diligence you get charged right then.


Done via E-Verify, apparently. So far so good.


Once you show you did do all that was required they want to see the
employees. One showed up, 3 jumped over the fence.


Ok. They are called, one shows up. The feds aren't going to try and chase
them. So far, so good.


The guy that showed up told them there must be some horrible mistake.
They said "Sure there was". Then they took his phony documents, told
him if he wants to appeal he can go to the office downtown. At that
point the guy left.


Here's the problem. As soon as they identified he was carrying false
papers, he would be arrested. Right then. No hesitation. Anything less
would not be believable. The only thing I can think of is that the papers
were fine or they thought they were fine, and lacking any other probable
cause, he was told he could go downtown to retrieve them.


Then the office people got the old "You were
almost arrested, don't ever do it again" speech.


This makes no sense. The company did everything that was required. The
response to this should be a polite... "Whatever you say. Is there
anything else? If not, we need to get back to work."


When asked if they should pay the employees the money they were owed,
the answer was "You can't, they don't have valid SS numbers. There is
no way to properly report the income".


For the three that jumped, sure. For the other, no way. If he was illegal
and standing in front of the officers, he'd be in handcuffs.


As I said, something must be missing.


It started bordering on a Joseph Heller novel after that
"You really need to check out your employees"
"How do we check"?
"The E Verify system"
"But E Verify was wrong"
Yes that happens a lot"
"But that is all we have"
"Yes ... and be more careful next time"


... "OK officers, You have a nice day now" and they leave.


That is a silent raid.


Here's your chance to do some pro bono work for some of those poor, illegal,
tred upon, wet back, criminals you have such a bleading heart for. Trot on
down to your closest INS office and give em a piece of your mind.


piece of mind. or chunk of lip?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT La Migra redux nom=de=plume[_2_] General 94 August 31st 10 01:28 AM
OT La Migra redux TopBassDog General 0 August 31st 10 12:21 AM
OT La Migra redux TopBassDog General 0 August 31st 10 12:20 AM
OT La Migra redux Secular Humanist[_4_] General 0 August 23rd 10 02:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017