....horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are
some of the results.

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg

In article ,
says...

...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are
some of the results.

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg

Oh, and I took those pictures. Really. I did.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

On 8/19/10 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone
wrote:

...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are
some of the results.

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg




Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since
1/20/09?
We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so
wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general.

I do think it is funny that Petraus is now the second coming of Christ
but when he worked for Bush and proposed the surge the left called him
"Betray Us".



I'm not and never have been a fan of Betray Us.

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:43:20 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone Else
wrote:

...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are
some of the results.

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg




Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since
1/20/09?
We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so
wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general.

actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we
needed more troops there.

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we
needed more troops there.

Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki
was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we
could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people.

and bush fired him for it

It is yet to be
seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will
probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that
they were going to have anyway.
I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged
in blood.

i dont care if iraq is stable. islam is a tragedy for the human race
and no muslim society...including indonesia...allows religous freedom.
iraq will never be stable as long as it's a muslim culture

"bpuharic" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we
needed more troops there.

Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki
was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we
could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people.

and bush fired him for it

It is yet to be
seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will
probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that
they were going to have anyway.
I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged
in blood.

i dont care if iraq is stable. islam is a tragedy for the human race
and no muslim society...including indonesia...allows religous freedom.
iraq will never be stable as long as it's a muslim culture

I think that statement could easily be made of any country that has religion
as a core part of the gov't.

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:28:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we
needed more troops there.

Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki
was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we
could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people.

and bush fired him for it

It is yet to be
seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will
probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that
they were going to have anyway.
I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged
in blood.

i dont care if iraq is stable. islam is a tragedy for the human race
and no muslim society...including indonesia...allows religous freedom.
iraq will never be stable as long as it's a muslim culture

I think that statement could easily be made of any country that has religion
as a core part of the gov't.


proof of that is the results of the bush administration

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:43:20 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone Else
wrote:

...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are
some of the results.

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg




Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since
1/20/09?
We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so
wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general.

actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we
needed more troops there.

Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki
was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we
could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people. It is yet to be
seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will
probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that
they were going to have anyway.
I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged
in blood.

The days of massing hundreds of thousands of troops like we did in Gulf
I was that there isn't the time nor the transportation resources to do
it. Everyone now knows that we don't have months to amass the troups.

And, the supply train that is needed to support one brigade in the field
is costly in troops to run the supply train and to protect it.

If we had put 250,000 combat troops into Iraq in Gulf II we could never
have afforded it. The Army didn't have the troops even with the Army
Reserve and the National Guard.

The days of overwhelming ground force are over and will never return.
Shinseki was was working from an old and out dated thinking.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:43:20 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone Else
wrote:

...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these
are
some of the results.

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg

http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg




Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since
1/20/09?
We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so
wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general.

actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we
needed more troops there.

Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki
was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we
could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people. It is yet to be
seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will
probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that
they were going to have anyway.
I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged
in blood.

The days of massing hundreds of thousands of troops like we did in Gulf
I was that there isn't the time nor the transportation resources to do
it. Everyone now knows that we don't have months to amass the troups.

And, the supply train that is needed to support one brigade in the field
is costly in troops to run the supply train and to protect it.

If we had put 250,000 combat troops into Iraq in Gulf II we could never
have afforded it. The Army didn't have the troops even with the Army
Reserve and the National Guard.

The days of overwhelming ground force are over and will never return.
Shinseki was was working from an old and out dated thinking.



Sure. You're more of an expert that a sitting general. Whatever.

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:38 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:59:17 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we
needed more troops there.

Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki
was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we
could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people.

and bush fired him for it

It is yet to be
seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will
probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that
they were going to have anyway.
I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged
in blood.

i dont care if iraq is stable. islam is a tragedy for the human race
and no muslim society...including indonesia...allows religous freedom.
iraq will never be stable as long as it's a muslim culture

Nuke'm all and let god sort them out huh?

they, like christians, are welcome to their pathological religious
beliefs. but they seem to have a fetish about imposing their beliefs
on me. quite fascist

which is why most religions are conservative