| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Seven years and six months of...
....horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are
some of the results. http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg |
Seven years and six months of...
On 8/19/10 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone wrote: ...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are some of the results. http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since 1/20/09? We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general. I do think it is funny that Petraus is now the second coming of Christ but when he worked for Bush and proposed the surge the left called him "Betray Us". I'm not and never have been a fan of Betray Us. |
Seven years and six months of...
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:43:20 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone Else wrote: ...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are some of the results. http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since 1/20/09? We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general. actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we needed more troops there. |
Seven years and six months of...
|
Seven years and six months of...
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote: actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we needed more troops there. Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people. and bush fired him for it It is yet to be seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that they were going to have anyway. I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged in blood. i dont care if iraq is stable. islam is a tragedy for the human race and no muslim society...including indonesia...allows religous freedom. iraq will never be stable as long as it's a muslim culture I think that statement could easily be made of any country that has religion as a core part of the gov't. |
Seven years and six months of...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:28:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote: actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we needed more troops there. Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people. and bush fired him for it It is yet to be seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that they were going to have anyway. I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged in blood. i dont care if iraq is stable. islam is a tragedy for the human race and no muslim society...including indonesia...allows religous freedom. iraq will never be stable as long as it's a muslim culture I think that statement could easily be made of any country that has religion as a core part of the gov't. proof of that is the results of the bush administration |
Seven years and six months of...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:43:20 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone Else wrote: ...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are some of the results. http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since 1/20/09? We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general. actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we needed more troops there. Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people. It is yet to be seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that they were going to have anyway. I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged in blood. The days of massing hundreds of thousands of troops like we did in Gulf I was that there isn't the time nor the transportation resources to do it. Everyone now knows that we don't have months to amass the troups. And, the supply train that is needed to support one brigade in the field is costly in troops to run the supply train and to protect it. If we had put 250,000 combat troops into Iraq in Gulf II we could never have afforded it. The Army didn't have the troops even with the Army Reserve and the National Guard. The days of overwhelming ground force are over and will never return. Shinseki was was working from an old and out dated thinking. |
Seven years and six months of...
"BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:43:20 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:41:08 -0400, Someone Else wrote: ...horror perpetrated by George W. Bush and Dique Cheney, and these are some of the results. http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lesullivan.jpg http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...RyanMaseth.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...rrent=Capt.jpg http://s99.photobucket.com/albums/l2...lvercedes3.jpg Do you have the same horror pictures of the dead soldiers since 1/20/09? We are following the same flawed strategy in Afghanistan that was so wonderful in Iraq, led by the same general. actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we needed more troops there. Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people. It is yet to be seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that they were going to have anyway. I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged in blood. The days of massing hundreds of thousands of troops like we did in Gulf I was that there isn't the time nor the transportation resources to do it. Everyone now knows that we don't have months to amass the troups. And, the supply train that is needed to support one brigade in the field is costly in troops to run the supply train and to protect it. If we had put 250,000 combat troops into Iraq in Gulf II we could never have afforded it. The Army didn't have the troops even with the Army Reserve and the National Guard. The days of overwhelming ground force are over and will never return. Shinseki was was working from an old and out dated thinking. Sure. You're more of an expert that a sitting general. Whatever. |
Seven years and six months of...
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:00:38 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:59:17 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:56:25 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:37 -0400, bpuharic wrote: actuallly not. bush fired the first general...shinseki...who said we needed more troops there. Petraeus was in charge of the surge and he replaced Casey. Shinseki was never in command in Iraq. I agree he did have the opinion that we could never stabilize Iraq without a lot more people. and bush fired him for it It is yet to be seen if Iraq will be stable after the surge is over.. The reality will probably be that our 6 year occupation only delayed the civil war that they were going to have anyway. I don't think those people respect any government that wasn't forged in blood. i dont care if iraq is stable. islam is a tragedy for the human race and no muslim society...including indonesia...allows religous freedom. iraq will never be stable as long as it's a muslim culture Nuke'm all and let god sort them out huh? they, like christians, are welcome to their pathological religious beliefs. but they seem to have a fetish about imposing their beliefs on me. quite fascist which is why most religions are conservative |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com