"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...

I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point.
Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob
doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.
--

John H


Don't attempt to "think".
It's not your strong suit!
You stole that line from me, dummy.


I was using that line when you were soiling diapers... or is that 'Depends'?

"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"Harry " wrote in message
...
On 8/18/10 10:38 PM, YukonBound wrote:


"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 6:45 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:22:16 -0700 (PDT), Jack

wrote:





On Aug 18, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:40:12 -0400, Larry
wrote:

Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, wrote:

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend
to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN
LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of
understanding it.

ah. so fairy tales are true?

no wonder the right has run the US into the ground

It was your own link, bob. Are you in the habit of posting fairy
tales?

you never learned to read in school, did you?

because this is NOT an isolated piece of data, as you seem to think.
it has to be linked with OTHER data on individual income vs family
income, the changes in demographics (dual vs single income
households), and changes in income by income group.

that's why right wingers are losers. you guys can't think.

You are hilarious. You're the one that screams "where's the data!
here's mine!", and then your own data proves your statements wrong.

Reading your posts are like watching a really funny trainwreck in slow
motion. Please don't stop!

You find train wrecks funny?
You're one weird goofball.

He is just another right wing POS.

When are you heading up to the Yukon?

--

More like 'out to the Yukon'..... refers to my boat, a Princecraft Yukon
Say what?

Quit using my lines, dummy!

In article ,
says...

"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...

I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point.
Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob
doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.
--

John H


Don't attempt to "think".
It's not your strong suit!
You stole that line from me, dummy.


I was using that line when you were soiling diapers... or is that 'Depends'?

Spoofer alert! When I take my nose out of Harry's ass long enough, he
teaches me how to insult and call names much better than that.

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a Mac, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a Mac, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his own ID.

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 18, 9:30*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:27:46 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:




IOW you think EVERYONE in the middle class is in a household

hmmm...seems you left out ALOT of people.

Leaves out almost no one. Figure out the definition of a "household"
in this context and get back to us.

Hint: The quantity of wage-earners and presence of children do not
enter into the equation.

gee. guess you forgot that MEN"S wages stagnated.

can't handle the truth, eh?

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:55:18 -0400, John H
wrote:



I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point. Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.

if you thought at all you wouldnt be a redneck

On 8/20/10 12:02 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:55:18 -0400, John
wrote:



I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point. Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.

if you thought at all you wouldnt be a redneck


I see herring is lying again. I'm not telling "bob" to post or not
post...anything.

In article ,
says...

On 8/20/10 12:02 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:55:18 -0400, John
wrote:



I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a point. Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.

if you thought at all you wouldnt be a redneck


I see herring is lying again. I'm not telling "bob" to post or not
post...anything.

Spoofer alert! I tell my little special buddy Don what to post all of
the time. Lately he hasn't been consulting me, and if you notice, he's
sounding dumber and dumber.

YukonBound wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...

I think Harry is telling Bob to post various articles and argue a
point. Bob
does so, not realizing the article doesn't support his point. Bob
doesn't read
the article 'cause Harry said it was OK.

That's what I think.
--

John H


Don't attempt to "think".
It's not your strong suit!
You stole that line from me, dummy.


I was using that line when you were soiling diapers... or is that
'Depends'?
I'm at least 20 years younger than you so I don't have your problems.

On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Aug 14, 7:42*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:05:44 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

h

Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. *You may, with hard work,
overcome your many deficiencies.

guess you missed the part that the rich get a 3.8% tax cut

the middle class? 1.5%.

this is why the economy collapsed. the middle class gets zip. we cant
spend because the weatlhy keep taking more and more.

try looking at the figures yourself. *a guy making 50K gets 772 in tax
cuts. a person making a million gets far far more.

Wrong. The family making 50k got a 48% reduction in taxes. All of
the other giveaways are phased out by the time you hit $200k or so.
You just don't want to see (or are incapable of seeing?) the big
picture. But you are a good parrot of the liberal lies.

nope. the numbers don't lie. why not post 'em here? or are you too
busy makin' 'em up to bother?

the GOP has never proposed a tax cut that didnt favor the rich

On Aug 25, 9:37*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:





On Aug 14, 7:42*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:05:44 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

h

Try it this time instead of knee-jerking. *You may, with hard work,
overcome your many deficiencies.

guess you missed the part that the rich get a 3.8% tax cut

the middle class? 1.5%.

this is why the economy collapsed. the middle class gets zip. we cant
spend because the weatlhy keep taking more and more.

try looking at the figures yourself. *a guy making 50K gets 772 in tax
cuts. a person making a million gets far far more.

Wrong. *The family making 50k got a 48% reduction in taxes. *All of
the other giveaways are phased out by the time you hit $200k or so.
You just don't want to see (or are incapable of seeing?) the big
picture. *But you are a good parrot of the liberal lies.

nope. the numbers don't lie. why not post 'em here? or are you too
busy makin' 'em up to bother?

the GOP has never proposed a tax cut that didnt favor the rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Here you go liar...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz0wUUgcEqB

Read, get informed, grow a spine and start telling the truth even if
it doesn't fit your self indulgent, progressive agenda...