Jack wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:48 pm, wrote:

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:28:01 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That is NOT what you've been saying. You said: "what percentage of
this (increase) was accounted for by a growth in dual
income families? There actually is a DECREASE in dual-income
families, which limited the observed INCREASE in income!!

??WTF? can you read? no one said...and no reference says...there has
been a DECREASE in dual income families. in addition to being stupid
are you illiterate?

Except your own link:
"While household income has *increased*, its growth has been slowed
by
a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have two
earners
and, therefore, higher incomes.

What about "a *decrease* in married-couple households who tend to have
two earners" does your dumb ass not understand? From YOUR OWN LINK!!

Seriously bob, you're mental. Deranged. Retarded.

cya

While every thing you said is true, Bob is incapable of understanding it.